"I could 100% see myself getting hurt if I did it wrong": a qualitative exploration of exercise perceptions in people with chronic low back pain.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2400592
Andrew R Natoli,Matthew D Jones,Emily D Walker,Mitchell T Gibbs
{"title":"\"I could 100% see myself getting hurt if I did it wrong\": a qualitative exploration of exercise perceptions in people with chronic low back pain.","authors":"Andrew R Natoli,Matthew D Jones,Emily D Walker,Mitchell T Gibbs","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2400592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTraditionally, a specific \"core\" exercise focus has been favoured for chronic low back pain (CLBP) which contrasts holistic exercise approaches. This study aims to explore the perceptions of exercise in people with CLBP and whether exercise itself can convey implicit messages regarding its use in CLBP management in the absence of a clinical narrative.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nParticipants were asked about their CLBP history, views of exercise for CLBP, and current exercise behaviours through online semi-structured interviews. Then, participants watched the interviewer perform the deadlift, Jefferson curl, and bird dog and were asked if they thought each individual exercise was beneficial for CLBP, and why. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis through a critical realism and social constructivism lens.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAll participants (n = 16) viewed all exercises as beneficial for health and pain relief, but perceived efficacy varied. \"Core\" exercises were deemed crucial for CLBP relief, while spinal flexion and external load were often perceived as potentially injurious. Distrust towards healthcare practitioners also influenced exercise perceptions.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nPeople with CLBP perceive different exercises to either relieve pain or improve health. Healthcare practitioners can influence these perceptions, highlighting the need for consideration of exercise perceptions in clinical contexts.","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2400592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Traditionally, a specific "core" exercise focus has been favoured for chronic low back pain (CLBP) which contrasts holistic exercise approaches. This study aims to explore the perceptions of exercise in people with CLBP and whether exercise itself can convey implicit messages regarding its use in CLBP management in the absence of a clinical narrative. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants were asked about their CLBP history, views of exercise for CLBP, and current exercise behaviours through online semi-structured interviews. Then, participants watched the interviewer perform the deadlift, Jefferson curl, and bird dog and were asked if they thought each individual exercise was beneficial for CLBP, and why. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis through a critical realism and social constructivism lens. RESULTS All participants (n = 16) viewed all exercises as beneficial for health and pain relief, but perceived efficacy varied. "Core" exercises were deemed crucial for CLBP relief, while spinal flexion and external load were often perceived as potentially injurious. Distrust towards healthcare practitioners also influenced exercise perceptions. CONCLUSION People with CLBP perceive different exercises to either relieve pain or improve health. Healthcare practitioners can influence these perceptions, highlighting the need for consideration of exercise perceptions in clinical contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"如果我做错了,100%会受伤":对慢性腰背痛患者运动认知的定性研究。
目的传统上,慢性腰背痛(CLBP)患者倾向于以特定的 "核心 "锻炼为重点,这与整体锻炼方法形成了鲜明对比。本研究旨在探讨慢性腰背痛患者对运动的看法,以及在没有临床叙述的情况下,运动本身是否能传达有关慢性腰背痛治疗中使用运动的隐含信息。然后,参与者观看采访者进行举重、杰斐逊卷曲和鸟狗运动,并被问及他们是否认为每种运动对 CLBP 有益以及原因。通过批判现实主义和社会建构主义视角,采用反思性主题分析法对数据进行了分析。结果所有参与者(n = 16)都认为所有运动都有益于健康和缓解疼痛,但对功效的认识各不相同。"核心 "运动被认为是缓解慢性脊柱炎的关键,而脊柱屈曲和外部负荷往往被认为可能会造成伤害。对医护人员的不信任也会影响对运动的认知。医护人员可能会影响这些认知,这就强调了在临床环境中考虑运动认知的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of observation-based tools for assessing use of the upper limb in activities. The healthcare experience of young stroke survivors: an interpretative phenomenological study. Clinician perspectives of engaging parents in behavioural interventions: a thematic analysis in Aotearoa New Zealand. Effects of inspiratory muscle training on pulmonary function, diaphragmatic thickness, balance and exercise capacity in people after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effectiveness of intensive motor learning approaches from working on a vertical surface on hemiplegic children's upper limb motor skills, a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1