Crater Morphometry on Callisto

IF 3.8 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS The Planetary Science Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.3847/psj/ad61dd
V. J. Bray, P. M. Schenk
{"title":"Crater Morphometry on Callisto","authors":"V. J. Bray, P. M. Schenk","doi":"10.3847/psj/ad61dd","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Impact crater formation is affected by the physical properties of planetary crusts, allowing comparison of crater dimensions to serve as a proxy for comparing the crustal properties of different planetary bodies. New topographic profiles of Callisto craters, derived from Galileo-based digital terrain models, are presented, and the crater dimensions recorded. These data were used to derive crater morphometry scaling trends, which were then compared to the established trends of Ganymede and the Moon. Our comparative study suggests that the upper brittle portion of Callisto’s ice crust allows for the retention of steep-sided and elevated rim scarps, while subsurface warmer ice leads to an enhanced uplift and shallowing of the crater bowl. Crater dimensions are similar between Callisto and Ganymede, suggesting that the bulk properties of their near-surface crusts are comparable. The most notable difference between craters on these two Galilean moons were the smaller central pit diameters on Callisto. This difference can be explained if the pit formation on these bodies is controlled by the presence and movement (drainage and/or volatile loss) of impact melt water: the lower impact velocity and/or lower expected crustal heat flow on Callisto will result in less impact melt generation, and thus smaller central pits.","PeriodicalId":34524,"journal":{"name":"The Planetary Science Journal","volume":"166 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Planetary Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/ad61dd","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Impact crater formation is affected by the physical properties of planetary crusts, allowing comparison of crater dimensions to serve as a proxy for comparing the crustal properties of different planetary bodies. New topographic profiles of Callisto craters, derived from Galileo-based digital terrain models, are presented, and the crater dimensions recorded. These data were used to derive crater morphometry scaling trends, which were then compared to the established trends of Ganymede and the Moon. Our comparative study suggests that the upper brittle portion of Callisto’s ice crust allows for the retention of steep-sided and elevated rim scarps, while subsurface warmer ice leads to an enhanced uplift and shallowing of the crater bowl. Crater dimensions are similar between Callisto and Ganymede, suggesting that the bulk properties of their near-surface crusts are comparable. The most notable difference between craters on these two Galilean moons were the smaller central pit diameters on Callisto. This difference can be explained if the pit formation on these bodies is controlled by the presence and movement (drainage and/or volatile loss) of impact melt water: the lower impact velocity and/or lower expected crustal heat flow on Callisto will result in less impact melt generation, and thus smaller central pits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡利斯托上的陨石坑形态测量
撞击坑的形成受行星地壳物理特性的影响,因此可以通过比较撞击坑的尺寸来比较不同行星体的地壳特性。本文介绍了根据伽利略数字地形模型得出的卡利斯托陨石坑新地形剖面图,并记录了陨石坑的尺寸。这些数据被用来推导陨石坑形态比例趋势,然后与木卫二和月球的既定趋势进行比较。我们的比较研究表明,卡利斯托冰壳的上部脆性部分使得陡峭和隆起的边缘疤痕得以保留,而地表下较暖的冰层则导致陨石坑碗的隆起和变浅。卡利斯托环形山和木卫三环形山的尺寸相似,这表明它们近地表冰壳的体积特性相当。这两颗伽利略卫星上的陨石坑之间最显著的差异是卡利斯托卫星上的陨石坑中心直径较小。如果这些天体上凹坑的形成是由撞击熔化水的存在和移动(排水和/或挥发损失)控制的,那么就可以解释这种差异:卡利斯托上较低的撞击速度和/或较低的预期地壳热流将导致较少的撞击熔化水产生,从而导致较小的中心凹坑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Planetary Science Journal
The Planetary Science Journal Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Jovian Vortex Hunter: A Citizen Science Project to Study Jupiter’s Vortices Experimental Method for Measuring Cohesion of Regolith via Electrostatic Lofting Mid-infrared Measurements of Ion-irradiated Carbonaceous Meteorites: How to Better Detect Space Weathering Effects Triton’s Captured Youth: Tidal Heating Kept Triton Warm and Active for Billions of Years The Global Distribution of Water and Hydroxyl on the Moon as Seen by the Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1