Assessing innovative care models for musculoskeletal disorders' management in the emergency department using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing

Rose Gagnon, Kadija Perreault, Jason Robert Guertin, Luc J. Hebert, Simon Berthelot
{"title":"Assessing innovative care models for musculoskeletal disorders' management in the emergency department using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing","authors":"Rose Gagnon, Kadija Perreault, Jason Robert Guertin, Luc J. Hebert, Simon Berthelot","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.14.24311988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Objectives:</strong> Compare the average cost of an emergency department (ED) visit between three ED care models, namely management by an emergency physician (EP) alone (usual care), management by a primary contact physiotherapist (PT) and an EP (intervention), and management by a PT alone (sensitivity analysis). <strong>Methods:</strong> Cost study (Canadian Public Payer perspective) based on data collected during a pragmatic randomized clinical trial (2018-2019) conducted in an urban Canadian academic ED (CHUL, Quebec City, Canada; n=78, 18-80 years old). Costs incurred for the management of persons presenting to the ED for a minor musculoskeletal disorder (MSKD) were calculated using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing, in which time invested with a patient determines care costs. The main outcome measure was the average cost of an ED visit. Generalized linear models with Gamma distributions and log links were used to assess whether there were significant differences in average costs between the care models. <strong>Results:</strong> Mean ED visit cost was $278.47 (2019 $CAD, 95%CI: $223.70, $357.42) for PT and EP management, compared with $254.68 for EP management ($178.48, $346.68), resulting in a non-significant absolute difference of 23.79 CAD/patient ($-87.04, $135.74) between models (p=.58). Sensitivity analyses showed that the average cost of ED management by a PT was $194.40 ($160.86, $235.14), representing a non-significant average saving of 60.28 CAD/patient ($-168.19, $31.46) compared to EP management. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study is a first step towards a better understanding of the costs incurred by the Canadian Public Payer for the management of persons presenting with MSKDs in the ED. Primary contact physiotherapists have the potential to complement care of MSKD ED patients without increasing healthcare costs.","PeriodicalId":501290,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Compare the average cost of an emergency department (ED) visit between three ED care models, namely management by an emergency physician (EP) alone (usual care), management by a primary contact physiotherapist (PT) and an EP (intervention), and management by a PT alone (sensitivity analysis). Methods: Cost study (Canadian Public Payer perspective) based on data collected during a pragmatic randomized clinical trial (2018-2019) conducted in an urban Canadian academic ED (CHUL, Quebec City, Canada; n=78, 18-80 years old). Costs incurred for the management of persons presenting to the ED for a minor musculoskeletal disorder (MSKD) were calculated using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing, in which time invested with a patient determines care costs. The main outcome measure was the average cost of an ED visit. Generalized linear models with Gamma distributions and log links were used to assess whether there were significant differences in average costs between the care models. Results: Mean ED visit cost was $278.47 (2019 $CAD, 95%CI: $223.70, $357.42) for PT and EP management, compared with $254.68 for EP management ($178.48, $346.68), resulting in a non-significant absolute difference of 23.79 CAD/patient ($-87.04, $135.74) between models (p=.58). Sensitivity analyses showed that the average cost of ED management by a PT was $194.40 ($160.86, $235.14), representing a non-significant average saving of 60.28 CAD/patient ($-168.19, $31.46) compared to EP management. Conclusion: This study is a first step towards a better understanding of the costs incurred by the Canadian Public Payer for the management of persons presenting with MSKDs in the ED. Primary contact physiotherapists have the potential to complement care of MSKD ED patients without increasing healthcare costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用时间驱动活动成本法评估急诊科肌肉骨骼疾病管理的创新护理模式
目标:比较三种急诊室护理模式的平均就诊成本:比较三种急诊科(ED)护理模式的平均就诊成本,即由急诊科医生(EP)单独管理(常规护理)、由初级联系物理治疗师(PT)和急诊科医生管理(干预)以及由物理治疗师单独管理(敏感性分析)。方法:成本研究(加拿大公共支付方视角),基于在加拿大城市学术急诊室(CHUL,加拿大魁北克市;n=78,18-80 岁)开展的一项实用随机临床试验(2018-2019 年)期间收集的数据。对因轻微肌肉骨骼疾病(MSKD)到急诊室就诊者的管理成本采用时间驱动活动成本法进行计算,其中对患者投入的时间决定了护理成本。主要结果指标是急诊室就诊的平均成本。采用伽马分布和对数链接的广义线性模型来评估不同护理模式的平均成本是否存在显著差异。结果显示PT和EP管理的平均ED就诊费用为278.47美元(2019年加元,95%CI:223.70美元,357.42美元),而EP管理的平均ED就诊费用为254.68美元(178.48美元,346.68美元),模型之间的绝对差异为23.79加元/患者(87.04美元,135.74美元),差异不显著(p=.58)。敏感性分析表明,由 PT 进行 ED 管理的平均成本为 194.40 美元(160.86 美元,235.14 美元),与 EP 管理相比,平均每名患者可节省 60.28 CAD(168.19 美元,31.46 美元),差异不显著。结论:这项研究为更好地了解加拿大公共付费者在急诊室治疗 MSKD 患者所产生的费用迈出了第一步。初级物理治疗师有可能在不增加医疗成本的情况下对急诊室 MSKD 患者的护理起到补充作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In-hospital stay of anemic patients (70-90 g.L-1) in the ED with/without transfusion: a single-center propensity-matched study. Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study What strategies are used to select patients for direct admission under acute medicine services? A systematic review of the literature. Feasibility of mixed-reality telecollaboration to enhance pre-medical student shadowing education Evaluating the Impact of NHS Strikes on Patient Flow through Emergency Departments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1