Boundary objects: sustainability reporting and the production of organizational stability

Manuel Fernández Chulián, Nicolas Garcia-Torea, Carlos Larrinaga, Jan Bebbington
{"title":"Boundary objects: sustainability reporting and the production of organizational stability","authors":"Manuel Fernández Chulián, Nicolas Garcia-Torea, Carlos Larrinaga, Jan Bebbington","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-08-2021-5391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The study investigates how sustainability reporting constructs a narrative about an organization that provides its members with a reality they can accept, with the consequence of producing organizational stability.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The article reports a research engagement concerning the “backstage” of sustainability reporting in one Spanish savings bank, which the researchers engaged with for more than three years.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The article describes how sustainability reporting operates as a boundary object occupying the space between the organization’s loosely coupled systems and facilitating the cooperation of members with different interpretations of the organization. Different translations of discourses and actions ensure that the sustainability report conveys a ductile narrative that can be tailored to specific interpretations. At the same time, the editing inherent in sustainability reporting ensures that any narrative that may challenge the organization’s dominant perspective is ignored and marginalized. In this way, sustainability reporting produces a discourse that inscribes a narrative of the organization and eventually ensures organizational inertia.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The article highlights the relevance of investigating sustainability reports by exploring the backstage of their production rather than solely the final document.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>In contrast to prior research that has been concerned with exploring the extent to which sustainability reporting is associated with organizational change, this study applies different lenses to show how and why sustainability reporting is implicated in the construction of the organization and the maintenance of its stability and inertia.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501027,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-08-2021-5391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The study investigates how sustainability reporting constructs a narrative about an organization that provides its members with a reality they can accept, with the consequence of producing organizational stability.

Design/methodology/approach

The article reports a research engagement concerning the “backstage” of sustainability reporting in one Spanish savings bank, which the researchers engaged with for more than three years.

Findings

The article describes how sustainability reporting operates as a boundary object occupying the space between the organization’s loosely coupled systems and facilitating the cooperation of members with different interpretations of the organization. Different translations of discourses and actions ensure that the sustainability report conveys a ductile narrative that can be tailored to specific interpretations. At the same time, the editing inherent in sustainability reporting ensures that any narrative that may challenge the organization’s dominant perspective is ignored and marginalized. In this way, sustainability reporting produces a discourse that inscribes a narrative of the organization and eventually ensures organizational inertia.

Research limitations/implications

The article highlights the relevance of investigating sustainability reports by exploring the backstage of their production rather than solely the final document.

Originality/value

In contrast to prior research that has been concerned with exploring the extent to which sustainability reporting is associated with organizational change, this study applies different lenses to show how and why sustainability reporting is implicated in the construction of the organization and the maintenance of its stability and inertia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边界对象:可持续性报告与组织稳定性的形成
本文报告了一项关于西班牙一家储蓄银行可持续发展报告 "后台 "的研究,研究人员与该银行进行了三年多的合作。研究结果本文描述了可持续发展报告如何作为一个边界对象,占据组织松散耦合系统之间的空间,促进对组织有不同解释的成员之间的合作。对话语和行动的不同诠释确保了可持续发展报告所传达的叙述具有延展性,可以根据特定的诠释进行调整。同时,可持续发展报告中固有的编辑功能确保任何可能挑战组织主导观点的叙述都会被忽视和边缘化。通过这种方式,可持续发展报告产生了一种刻画组织叙事的话语,并最终确保了组织的惰性。研究局限性/意义本文强调了通过探索可持续发展报告制作的后台而不仅仅是最终文件来调查可持续发展报告的相关性。原创性/价值与之前关注探索可持续发展报告与组织变革相关程度的研究不同,本研究采用了不同的视角来展示可持续发展报告如何以及为何与组织的构建及其稳定性和惰性的维持有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ways of not seeing: visibility, blindness, and the transparency game Accounting for racial inequality in South Africa with the black economic empowerment policy Boundary objects: sustainability reporting and the production of organizational stability Responding to employee-based race inequalities in National Health Service (England): accountability and the Workforce Race Equality Standard The failure of the United Kingdom’s accounting and fiscal governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1