Exploring the suitability of cannabis use with next‐day responsibilities: A behavioral‐economic and qualitative study

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1002/jeab.4209
Brandon P. Miller, Kianna Csölle, Christina Chen, Anna Lester, Sarah C. Weinsztok, Elizabeth R. Aston, Michael Amlung
{"title":"Exploring the suitability of cannabis use with next‐day responsibilities: A behavioral‐economic and qualitative study","authors":"Brandon P. Miller, Kianna Csölle, Christina Chen, Anna Lester, Sarah C. Weinsztok, Elizabeth R. Aston, Michael Amlung","doi":"10.1002/jeab.4209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cannabis demand is sensitive to next‐day responsibilities, such as job interviews; however, it is unclear how demand is affected by non‐work‐related responsibilities and how reported compatibility of cannabis use (i.e., how suitable one perceives cannabis use to be in a situation) influences demand. This study examined the effects of a range of responsibilities on cannabis demand in a crowdsourced sample of adults who smoked cannabis at least monthly (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 177; 78% White; 47% women; mean age = 36.52). Participants completed hypothetical marijuana purchase tasks asking how much cannabis they would consume at escalating prices in the context of no responsibilities and next‐day responsibilities spanning work, leisure, and caregiving. Cannabis demand was significantly reduced in all responsibility conditions (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic>s &lt; .008; <jats:italic>d</jats:italic>s .28–.94), with the largest reductions for the job interview and caring‐for‐kids conditions. Higher ratings of suitability of cannabis use in each situation were correlated with higher demand. Finally, a qualitative thematic analysis characterized why cannabis use was considered suitable or unsuitable with each responsibility. These results suggest that demand is sensitive to next‐day responsibilities. However, these effects are not uniform, and future research is needed to examine these individual differences and the timing of upcoming responsibilities.","PeriodicalId":17411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.4209","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cannabis demand is sensitive to next‐day responsibilities, such as job interviews; however, it is unclear how demand is affected by non‐work‐related responsibilities and how reported compatibility of cannabis use (i.e., how suitable one perceives cannabis use to be in a situation) influences demand. This study examined the effects of a range of responsibilities on cannabis demand in a crowdsourced sample of adults who smoked cannabis at least monthly (n = 177; 78% White; 47% women; mean age = 36.52). Participants completed hypothetical marijuana purchase tasks asking how much cannabis they would consume at escalating prices in the context of no responsibilities and next‐day responsibilities spanning work, leisure, and caregiving. Cannabis demand was significantly reduced in all responsibility conditions (ps < .008; ds .28–.94), with the largest reductions for the job interview and caring‐for‐kids conditions. Higher ratings of suitability of cannabis use in each situation were correlated with higher demand. Finally, a qualitative thematic analysis characterized why cannabis use was considered suitable or unsuitable with each responsibility. These results suggest that demand is sensitive to next‐day responsibilities. However, these effects are not uniform, and future research is needed to examine these individual differences and the timing of upcoming responsibilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索使用大麻与次日责任的适宜性:行为经济学和定性研究
大麻需求对第二天的责任(如求职面试)很敏感;然而,目前还不清楚与工作无关的责任对需求有何影响,也不清楚所报告的大麻使用兼容性(即个人认为在某种情况下使用大麻的合适程度)对需求有何影响。本研究以至少每月吸食一次大麻的成年人(n = 177;78% 白人;47% 女性;平均年龄 = 36.52)为众包样本,研究了一系列责任对大麻需求的影响。参与者完成了假设的大麻购买任务,询问在无责任和次日责任(包括工作、休闲和照料)的情况下,他们会以不断攀升的价格消费多少大麻。在所有责任条件下,大麻需求量都明显减少(ps < .008; ds .28-.94),其中工作面试和照顾孩子条件下的减少量最大。对每种情况下使用大麻的适宜性评价越高,需求量越大。最后,一项定性专题分析描述了在每种责任中使用大麻被认为合适或不合适的原因。这些结果表明,需求对第二天的责任很敏感。然而,这些影响并不一致,未来的研究需要考察这些个体差异和即将承担责任的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior is primarily for the original publication of experiments relevant to the behavior of individual organisms.
期刊最新文献
The effects of simultaneous point gains and losses on human persistence. Discrimination of highly similar stimuli as members of different equivalence classes. Issue Information Reward deprivation is associated with elevated alcohol demand in emerging adults. Resurgence in a discrete-trial procedure in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1