Clinical evaluation of a highly multiplexed CRISPR-based diagnostic assay for diagnosing lower respiratory tract infection: a prospective cohort study.

IF 4 4区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1080/23744235.2024.2402921
Hui Lou,Xiaojia Wang,Qiuting Jiang,Xi Li,Yake Yao,Qi Chen,Linxing Chen,Shanshan Zhang,Yunsong Yu,Chao Liu,Hua Zhou
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of a highly multiplexed CRISPR-based diagnostic assay for diagnosing lower respiratory tract infection: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Hui Lou,Xiaojia Wang,Qiuting Jiang,Xi Li,Yake Yao,Qi Chen,Linxing Chen,Shanshan Zhang,Yunsong Yu,Chao Liu,Hua Zhou","doi":"10.1080/23744235.2024.2402921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nAccurate and rapid identification of causative pathogens is essential to guide the clinical management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Here we conducted a single-centre prospective study in 284 patients suspected of lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the utility of a nucleic acid test based on highly multiplexed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and CRISPR-Cas12a.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe determined the analytical and diagnostic performance of the CRISPR assay using a combination of reference standards, including conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS), and clinical adjudication by a panel of experts on infectious diseases and microbiology.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe CRISPR assay showed a higher detection rate (63.0%) than conventional microbiological tests (38.4%) and was lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (72.9%). In detecting polymicrobial infections, the positivity rate of the CRISPR assay (19.4%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (3.5%) and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (28.9%). The overall diagnostic sensitivity of the CRISPR assay (67.8%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (41.8%), and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (93.2%).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nConsidering the low cost, ease of operation, short turnaround time, and broad range of pathogens detected in a single test, the CRISPR assay has the potential to be implemented as a screening tool for the aetiological diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections patients, especially in cases where atypical bacteria or coinfections are suspected.","PeriodicalId":13671,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases","volume":"18 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2024.2402921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Accurate and rapid identification of causative pathogens is essential to guide the clinical management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Here we conducted a single-centre prospective study in 284 patients suspected of lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the utility of a nucleic acid test based on highly multiplexed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and CRISPR-Cas12a. METHODS We determined the analytical and diagnostic performance of the CRISPR assay using a combination of reference standards, including conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS), and clinical adjudication by a panel of experts on infectious diseases and microbiology. RESULTS The CRISPR assay showed a higher detection rate (63.0%) than conventional microbiological tests (38.4%) and was lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (72.9%). In detecting polymicrobial infections, the positivity rate of the CRISPR assay (19.4%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (3.5%) and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (28.9%). The overall diagnostic sensitivity of the CRISPR assay (67.8%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (41.8%), and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (93.2%). CONCLUSIONS Considering the low cost, ease of operation, short turnaround time, and broad range of pathogens detected in a single test, the CRISPR assay has the potential to be implemented as a screening tool for the aetiological diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections patients, especially in cases where atypical bacteria or coinfections are suspected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断下呼吸道感染的高度复用 CRISPR 诊断测定的临床评估:一项前瞻性队列研究。
目的准确、快速地鉴定致病病原体对于指导下呼吸道感染(LRTI)的临床治疗至关重要。在此,我们对 284 名疑似下呼吸道感染患者进行了一项单中心前瞻性研究,以评估基于高度复用聚合酶链反应(PCR)和 CRISPR-Cas12a 的核酸检验的实用性。结果CRISPR检测的检出率(63.0%)高于传统微生物检测(38.4%),但低于元基因组下一代测序(72.9%)。在检测多微生物感染方面,CRISPR 检测的阳性率(19.4%)高于传统微生物检测(3.5%),低于元基因组下一代测序(28.9%)。CRISPR 检测的总体诊断灵敏度(67.8%)高于传统微生物检测(41.8%),低于元基因组下一代测序(93.2%)。结论考虑到 CRISPR 检测成本低、操作简便、周转时间短、单次检测可检测的病原体范围广,CRISPR 检测有可能被用作下呼吸道感染患者病原学诊断的筛查工具,尤其是在怀疑存在非典型细菌或合并感染的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases
Infectious Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
92
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases (formerly Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing articles on all aspects of human infection, including pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, and also on medical microbiology and epidemiology
期刊最新文献
The silent invaders: Oropouche and Melao viruses, causes of increased public health risks for the Americas. Evaluation of the 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria for infective endocarditis in patients referred to the Lund infective endocarditis team. Clinical evaluation of a highly multiplexed CRISPR-based diagnostic assay for diagnosing lower respiratory tract infection: a prospective cohort study. First cases of mpox Clade I outside of Africa: genetic insights on its evolution. Trends in decision-making by primary care physicians regarding common infectious complaints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1