A panel‐based mutational signature of homologous recombination deficiency associates with response to PARP inhibition in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer
Daniel Boiarsky, Alok K. Tewari, Doga C. Gulhan, Ziad Bakouny, Guruprasad Ananda, Hunter Savignano, Gitanjali Lakshminarayanan, Heather M. McClure, Rebecca Silver, Toni K. Choueiri, Mary‐Ellen Taplin, Peter J. Park, Jacob E. Berchuck
{"title":"A panel‐based mutational signature of homologous recombination deficiency associates with response to PARP inhibition in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer","authors":"Daniel Boiarsky, Alok K. Tewari, Doga C. Gulhan, Ziad Bakouny, Guruprasad Ananda, Hunter Savignano, Gitanjali Lakshminarayanan, Heather M. McClure, Rebecca Silver, Toni K. Choueiri, Mary‐Ellen Taplin, Peter J. Park, Jacob E. Berchuck","doi":"10.1002/pros.24788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe PARP inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib is approved for homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene‐altered metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, there is significant heterogeneity in response to PARPi in patients with mCRPC. Better clinical biomarkers are needed to identify patients likely to benefit from PARPi.MethodsPatients with prostate adenocarcinoma and panel sequencing at Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute were identified. Mutational signature analysis was performed using SigMA to characterize tumors as HRR deficient (HRD). The validity of SigMA to identify patients likely to benefit from olaparib was compared to the current FDA label (presence of a deleterious alteration in one of 14 HRR genes).Results546 patients were identified, of which 34% were HRD. Among patients with HRR gene alterations, only patients with <jats:italic>BRCA2</jats:italic> two‐copy loss (2CL) were more likely to be HRD compared to patients without HRR gene alterations (74% vs 31%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 9.1 × 10<jats:sup>‐7</jats:sup>). 28 patients with mCRPC received olaparib, of which 13 were HRD and 9 had <jats:italic>BRCA2</jats:italic> 2CL. SigMA improved upon the current FDA label for predicting PSA50 (sensitivity: 100% vs 90%; specificity: 83% vs 44%; PPV: 77% vs 47%; NPV: 100% vs 89%) and rPFS > 6 months (sensitivity: both 92%; specificity: 93% vs 53%; PPV: 92% vs 63%; NPV: 93% vs 89%). On multivariate analysis, incorporating prognostic clinical factors and HR gene alterations, SigMA‐predicted HRD independently associated with improved PSA‐PFS (HR = 0.086, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.00082) and rPFS (HR = 0.078, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.0070).ConclusionsSigMA‐predicted HRD may better identify patients likely to benefit from olaparib as compared to the current FDA label. Larger studies are needed for further validation.","PeriodicalId":501684,"journal":{"name":"The Prostate","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundThe PARP inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib is approved for homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene‐altered metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, there is significant heterogeneity in response to PARPi in patients with mCRPC. Better clinical biomarkers are needed to identify patients likely to benefit from PARPi.MethodsPatients with prostate adenocarcinoma and panel sequencing at Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute were identified. Mutational signature analysis was performed using SigMA to characterize tumors as HRR deficient (HRD). The validity of SigMA to identify patients likely to benefit from olaparib was compared to the current FDA label (presence of a deleterious alteration in one of 14 HRR genes).Results546 patients were identified, of which 34% were HRD. Among patients with HRR gene alterations, only patients with BRCA2 two‐copy loss (2CL) were more likely to be HRD compared to patients without HRR gene alterations (74% vs 31%; P = 9.1 × 10‐7). 28 patients with mCRPC received olaparib, of which 13 were HRD and 9 had BRCA2 2CL. SigMA improved upon the current FDA label for predicting PSA50 (sensitivity: 100% vs 90%; specificity: 83% vs 44%; PPV: 77% vs 47%; NPV: 100% vs 89%) and rPFS > 6 months (sensitivity: both 92%; specificity: 93% vs 53%; PPV: 92% vs 63%; NPV: 93% vs 89%). On multivariate analysis, incorporating prognostic clinical factors and HR gene alterations, SigMA‐predicted HRD independently associated with improved PSA‐PFS (HR = 0.086, p = 0.00082) and rPFS (HR = 0.078, p = 0.0070).ConclusionsSigMA‐predicted HRD may better identify patients likely to benefit from olaparib as compared to the current FDA label. Larger studies are needed for further validation.
背景PARP抑制剂(PARPi)奥拉帕利被批准用于治疗同源重组修复(HRR)基因改变的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)。然而,mCRPC 患者对 PARPi 的反应存在明显的异质性。我们需要更好的临床生物标志物来识别可能从 PARPi 中获益的患者。使用 SigMA 进行突变特征分析,将肿瘤定性为 HRR 缺乏(HRD)。将 SigMA 识别可能从奥拉帕利获益的患者的有效性与当前的 FDA 标签(14 个 HRR 基因之一存在有害改变)进行了比较。在有HRR基因改变的患者中,只有BRCA2双拷贝缺失(2CL)患者比没有HRR基因改变的患者更有可能是HRD(74% vs 31%; P = 9.1 × 10-7)。28例mCRPC患者接受了奥拉帕利治疗,其中13例为HRD,9例为BRCA2 2CL。在预测PSA50(灵敏度:100% vs 90%;特异性:83% vs 44%;PPV:77% vs 47%;NPV:100% vs 89%)和rPFS > 6个月(灵敏度:均为92%;特异性:93% vs 53%;PPV:92% vs 63%;NPV:93% vs 89%)方面,SigMA比目前的FDA标签有所改进。结论与目前的 FDA 标签相比,SigMA 预测的 HRD 可以更好地识别可能从奥拉帕利获益的患者。需要更大规模的研究来进一步验证。