Humpback whale feeding behavior and defecation observed on the Hawaiian breeding grounds

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q2 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Marine Mammal Science Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1111/mms.13177
Marc O. Lammers, Julia Zeh, Adam A. Pack, Eden Zang, Ed Lyman
{"title":"Humpback whale feeding behavior and defecation observed on the Hawaiian breeding grounds","authors":"Marc O. Lammers,&nbsp;Julia Zeh,&nbsp;Adam A. Pack,&nbsp;Eden Zang,&nbsp;Ed Lyman","doi":"10.1111/mms.13177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The traditional paradigm of humpback whale (<i>Megaptera novaeangliae</i>) behavior involves migration annually between low latitude breeding grounds and high latitude feeding grounds, with limited or no feeding during migration (see Owen et al., <span>2017</span>), and individuals fasting on the breeding grounds (e.g., Baker et al., <span>1986</span>; Chittleborough, <span>1965</span>; Clapham, <span>2000</span>; Dawbin <span>1966</span>; Katona &amp; Beard, <span>1990</span>; cf. Mikhalev, <span>1997</span>). Humpback whales have been recognized as dietary generalists since the examination of stomach contents during commercial whaling operations (e.g., Clapham et al., <span>1997</span>). While at high latitudes in the northern hemisphere, humpback whales, known commonly as lunge feeders, typically consume krill (<i>Euphausia</i> sp.) and small schooling fish such as capelin (<i>Mallotus villosus</i>), herring (<i>Clupea</i> sp.), sand-lance (<i>Ammodytes</i> sp.), and juvenile salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus</i> sp.) (Straley et al., <span>2018</span>; Szabo, <span>2015</span>; Witteveen et al., <span>2008</span>, <span>2011</span>; Reidy et al., <span>2022</span>). In the southern hemisphere, researchers have historically maintained that humpback whales rely largely on Antarctic krill (<i>Euphausia superba</i>; Groß et al., <span>2020</span>). However, recent data employing stable isotope techniques have revealed that like the northern hemisphere humpbacks, they too are generalists (Bury et al., <span>2024</span>), exploiting small schooling fish such as jack mackerel (<i>Trachurus declivis</i>), pilchards (<i>Sardinops neopilchardus</i>), and redbait (<i>Emmelichthy nitidus</i>) along their migration route (Owen et al., <span>2017</span>). Shifts in the dominant prey source in response to location, variations in ocean temperatures and ecosystem conditions reinforces this dietary flexibility (Fleming et al., <span>2016</span>). Humpback whales and other baleen whales are considered capital breeders, and during migration and breeding, their metabolic needs are thought to be met by breakdown of adipose tissue, resulting in a loss of body mass while migrating thousands of kilometers and engaging in breeding behaviors (Christiansen et al., <span>2016</span>).</p><p>While most humpback whales, including all age classes and reproductive conditions, do migrate annually between feeding and breeding grounds (e.g., Chittleborough, <span>1965</span>; Craig et al., <span>2003</span>; Straley et al., 1994), there is a growing body of evidence that there may not be strict adherence of foraging behavior to only high-latitude habitats and that there may be more plasticity in these behaviors than previously thought. First, as noted earlier there is evidence of feeding along migratory routes in both hemispheres (Baraff et al., <span>1991</span>; Owen et al., <span>2024</span>; Stamation et al., <span>2007</span>; Swingle et al., <span>1993</span>). Second, behavior and other evidence of foraging, like defecation and stomach contents of stranded whales, have been observed in winter in tropical waters of the eastern Pacific Ocean off Nicaragua (De Weerdt &amp; Ramos, <span>2020</span>), Ecuador (Garcia Cegarra et al., <span>2021</span>), and Mexico (Frisch-Jordan et al., <span>2019</span>; Gendron &amp; Urban, <span>1993</span>), as well as in the western Atlantic off the coast of Brazil (Bortolotto et al., <span>2016</span>; Danilewicz et al., <span>2009</span>; De Sá Alves et al., <span>2009</span>) and in the Dominican Republic (Baraff et al., <span>1991</span>). Thus, although documentation of foraging on low-latitude breeding grounds among migrating whales is limited, opportunistic feeding may not be uncommon (De Sá Alves et al., <span>2009</span>; Gendron &amp; Urban, <span>1993</span>).</p><p>The principal breeding habitat for humpback whales in the North Pacific is the Hawaiian Islands (Barlow et al., <span>2011</span>), with large numbers of whales traditionally aggregating particularly in the Maui Nui region that includes the islands of Maui, Molokaʻi, Lanai, and Kahoʻolawe (Herman &amp; Antinoja, <span>1977</span>; Mobley et al., <span>1999</span>). On the Hawaiian breeding ground, this well-studied population exhibits behaviors such as male song, male–male competition, males escorting females, and females nursing their newborn calves (see Herman, <span>2017</span> for a review). Foraging behavior by humpback whales in Hawaiʻi has only rarely been reported anecdotally, including a single apparent feeding lunge by a juvenile whale on a school of Pacific chub mackerel (<i>Scomber japonicus</i>) photographed off Maui in 1989 (Salden, <span>1989</span>, <span>1990</span>). Here, we report two recent documented instances of humpback whales lunge feeding on schools of fish and on observations of whale defecation in Hawaiian waters during the winter breeding season.</p><p>On January 23, 2023, a collaborative research team representing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary, Syracuse University, and the University of Hawaiʻi at Hilo conducted a mission to deploy instrumented suction-cup data logging tags (CATS, Acousonde &amp; Dtags; see Burgess et al., <span>1998</span>; Cade et al., <span>2016</span>; Johnson &amp; Tyack, <span>2003</span>) on humpback whales off west Maui. A single juvenile-sized (~7–9 m in length) whale was sighted and approached approximately 5.1 km southwest of Olowalu, Maui (20.77°N, 156.65°W). From several hundred meters away, the whale could be seen performing surface lunges, giving the impression of socially engaging with another whale. However, as the research vessel approached closer to attempt to deploy a tag on the whale, the whale performed a distinctive lateral surface feeding lunge &lt;10 m from the bow of the vessel. The whale was observed lunging towards the surface on its right side with its mouth open and its ventral pleats distended, and then closing its mouth once at the surface (Figure 1). A large (~5–8 m diameter) bait ball of darkly colored, slim fish approximately 5–7 cm in length was observed in the location where the whale was feeding (Figure 2). The whale continued to perform feeding lunges after a failed attempt to deploy a tag.</p><p>Multiple GoPro video cameras and smartphones were used to film the encounter from the surface and underwater, capturing 13 feeding lunges with an average interval between lunges of 43.3 ± 18.3 s. After about 20 min of feeding, the whale began moving away from the bait ball and was not resighted. We were unable to identify the species of the prey.</p><p>Nine days later, on February 1, 2023, the pilot of a commercial helicopter tour operated by GoFly Maui reported an adult-sized whale off the northeast coast of the island of Molokaʻi, near Cape Halawa (21.17°N, 156.71°W) apparently lunge-feeding on a bait ball at the surface. A passenger took photographs of the activity using a digital single-lens reflex camera with a zoom lens and documented two lunge-feeding events. In the resulting sequence of images (Figure 3), the whale can be seen approaching a bait ball of fish from below, at which point the fish begin to scatter at the surface. The whale is then seen engulfing a large portion of the bait ball while lunging laterally on its right side. The images show the whale with its mouth open showing baleen and distended ventral pleats. Following the feeding lunge, the whale can be seen expelling air and water out of the sides of its mouth.</p><p>Although documented cases of whales feeding are historically rare on the Hawaiian breeding ground, documentation of whale defecation is more common (Figure 4). Table S1 in the supplementary materials summarizes 27 observed defecation events compiled from the archives of the authors' field notes from 1998 to 2023. Except in rare cases, no collections of fecal materials were made and no analyses of composition were conducted. Defecation events were observed both from the surface and underwater while researchers gathered video and audio data while snorkeling. Defecation was observed during the four principal months (January–April) of the breeding season in both noncompetitive and competitive groups. Both male and female humpback whales occupying various behavioral roles were observed defecating. Defecations were never observed from calves, and only two were from juvenile-sized whales; most were from adult-sized whales (estimated visually). Defecations were observed while whales were slowly traveling as well as when they dove or surfaced. When reported, defecations were brown or brownish green in color, likely reflecting the composition of their prey (e.g., fish). None were red or purple as reported often from humpback whales defecating in the feeding grounds, where the dominant prey is often krill (e.g. Reidy et al., <span>2022</span>). The consistency of humpback whale feces varied from fine matter in the form of a large dark cloud to, slick-like viscous material, to large cube-like fibrous chunks. In one instance, defecation was associated with a pungent scent at the surface.</p><p>The rarity of documented feeding by humpback whales in Hawaiʻi suggests that it is not a common behavior. However, how uncommon it is, remains an open question. The more frequently observed cases of whale defecation dating back to at least 1998 suggests that more feeding may be occurring in Hawaiʻi than is witnessed, although it remains unclear whether feces could simply represent byproducts of adipose tissue metabolism or fish consumed during migration (e.g., Owen et al., <span>2017</span>). On high latitude feeding grounds, humpback whales are known to influence the health of the ecosystem by cycling important nutrients via their feces, which contribute to local biological productivity (Roman &amp; McCarthy, <span>2010</span>) and earning them the label of “marine ecosystem engineers” (Roman et al., <span>2014</span>). If the observed events of defecation do represent feeding while in Hawaiʻi, it suggests similar ecological processes could be occurring and raises some critical questions, namely: what are whales eating, where and when are they eating, and why are they eating while in Hawaiʻi?</p><p>To be clear, the answers to these questions are unknown. However, clues exist that could point to answers. Salden (<span>1990</span>) described a juvenile whale lunge-feeding on a school of Pacific chub mackerel. This species is not common in Hawaiʻi, so it is possible that it may instead have been misidentified for the more prevalent mackerel scad (<i>Decapterus macarellus</i>), known in Hawaiʻi as <i>ʻopelu</i>, or bigeye scad (<i>Selar crumenophthalmus</i>), known as <i>akule</i>. <i>ʻOpelu</i> and <i>akule</i> are commonly found in coastal Hawaiian waters. Thus, it is possible that whales may target larger aggregations of these fish under certain circumstances. However, unlike in the two most recent feeding cases, only one feeding lunge was observed by Salden (<span>1990</span>), despite having visually tracked the whale prior to and after the event. So, if they occur, feeding attempts on these species are likely rare and opportunistic.</p><p>In the more recent case of feeding observed off Olowalu, Maui, the bait ball was composed of small, slim fish estimated to be approximately 5–7 cm in length and, darkly colored dorsally. These were neither <i>ʻopelu</i> nor <i>akule</i>, which measure approximately 20 cm in length and have bluish or sliver coloration. In winter of 2023 fishermen reported unusually frequent sightings of schools of Hawaiian anchovy (<i>Encrasicholina purpurea</i>), known locally as <i>nehu</i> (Brian Ishida, personal communication, February 21, 2023), that match the description of the fish observed. Another possibility is that these may have been remnant members of the nocturnally present mesopelagic boundary community (MBC; Reid et al., <span>1991</span>), which migrates from deep offshore waters during the day to shallow coastal waters at night (Benoit-Bird &amp; Au, <span>2004</span>; Benoit-Bird et al., <span>2001</span>). Members of the family <i>Myctophidae</i>, which are a major component of the MBC, can also be approximately 5–7 cm in length, darkly colored dorsally, and slim (Benoit-Bird &amp; Au, <span>2006</span>). Although no direct evidence of whales feeding on the MBC exists, Henderson et al. (<span>2022</span>) report that humpback whales instrumented with satellite-monitored location-dive tags that transited between Hawaiian Islands conducted long, deep dives to depths of 100–300 m during nighttime hours. They hypothesized that whales could be diving to meet the rising MBC, as has been observed in certain odontocete species (Benoit-Bird &amp; Au, <span>2003</span>; Copeland et al., <span>2019</span>). This suggestion has also been made by Derville et al. (<span>2020</span>) for humpback whales showing similar diving behavior in New Caledonia.</p><p>The question of where and when whales feed in Hawaiʻi is of course related to the species they may be consuming. If feeding is restricted to daytime hours, then opportunistic exploitation of nearby schools of <i>Nehu</i>, <i>ʻopelu</i>, or <i>akule</i> may be the primary circumstance in which feeding takes place. These are likely to be rare, stochastic events not tied to specific locations and probably only occur when a whale is simply in the right place at the right time. On the other hand, if whales target the MBC at night, as speculated by Henderson et al. (<span>2022</span>) and Derville et al. (<span>2020</span>), then this would give them regular opportunities for foraging, since the MBC predictably enters shallow coastal waters in Hawaiʻi nightly (Benoit-Bird &amp; Au, <span>2003</span>, <span>2006</span>). If periodic nocturnal feeding does occur, it could help explain the comparatively more common observations of defecation. Future analyses to determine the identification of prey species present in humpback whale fecal samples collected in the Hawaiian breeding grounds (e.g., Reidy et al., <span>2022</span>), as well as stable isotope analysis of skin/blubber biopsy samples (e.g., Witteveen et al., <span>2011</span>) could help reveal what humpback whales are consuming in Hawaiian waters.</p><p>Why some whales may choose to spend time feeding while in Hawaiʻi is difficult to surmise but may be informed by the age class of the whales observed. Two out of the three cases described or cited here involved juvenile whales. Juveniles have limited body resources to metabolize and thus typically have shorter residency times in the Hawaiian breeding grounds and earlier departures for the breeding grounds than adult males and mothers of newly born calves (Craig et al., <span>2001</span>, <span>2003</span>). It may be that, unlike mature adults, which are primarily focused on reproductive behaviors, juveniles may need to spend some time supplementing their energy reserves built up over the summer on high latitude feeding grounds to sustain themselves on the breeding grounds and facilitate their migration back to the feeding grounds. Alternatively, they may simply be more inclined to capitalize on a feeding opportunity. Moreover, this might be more necessary during some years than others, depending on how productive the feeding season was during the summer. Thus, climate factors such as marine heat waves and El Nino/Southern Oscillation events, which influence productivity on the summer feeding grounds (Frankel et al., <span>2022</span>; Gentemann et al., <span>2017</span>), could help determine the need for whales to supplement energy reserves while in the breeding grounds.</p><p>Although there is much more that needs to be understood about humpback whale feeding behavior in the Hawaiian breeding grounds, the fact that it does occur, coupled with observed defecation, suggests that the whales may be interacting with the local marine ecosystem in ways that have not been previously examined. The extent to which humpback whales are influencing the Hawaiʻi marine ecosystem through feeding and defecation is presently unknown but may be a fruitful area of future research.</p><p><b>Marc O. Lammers:</b> Conceptualization; data curation; investigation; supervision; writing – original draft. <b>Julia Zeh:</b> Conceptualization; investigation; writing – original draft. <b>Adam A. Pack:</b> Conceptualization; data curation; writing – original draft. <b>Eden Zang:</b> Investigation. <b>Ed Lyman:</b> Conceptualization; data curation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18725,"journal":{"name":"Marine Mammal Science","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mms.13177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Mammal Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mms.13177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The traditional paradigm of humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) behavior involves migration annually between low latitude breeding grounds and high latitude feeding grounds, with limited or no feeding during migration (see Owen et al., 2017), and individuals fasting on the breeding grounds (e.g., Baker et al., 1986; Chittleborough, 1965; Clapham, 2000; Dawbin 1966; Katona & Beard, 1990; cf. Mikhalev, 1997). Humpback whales have been recognized as dietary generalists since the examination of stomach contents during commercial whaling operations (e.g., Clapham et al., 1997). While at high latitudes in the northern hemisphere, humpback whales, known commonly as lunge feeders, typically consume krill (Euphausia sp.) and small schooling fish such as capelin (Mallotus villosus), herring (Clupea sp.), sand-lance (Ammodytes sp.), and juvenile salmon (Oncorhynchus sp.) (Straley et al., 2018; Szabo, 2015; Witteveen et al., 2008, 2011; Reidy et al., 2022). In the southern hemisphere, researchers have historically maintained that humpback whales rely largely on Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba; Groß et al., 2020). However, recent data employing stable isotope techniques have revealed that like the northern hemisphere humpbacks, they too are generalists (Bury et al., 2024), exploiting small schooling fish such as jack mackerel (Trachurus declivis), pilchards (Sardinops neopilchardus), and redbait (Emmelichthy nitidus) along their migration route (Owen et al., 2017). Shifts in the dominant prey source in response to location, variations in ocean temperatures and ecosystem conditions reinforces this dietary flexibility (Fleming et al., 2016). Humpback whales and other baleen whales are considered capital breeders, and during migration and breeding, their metabolic needs are thought to be met by breakdown of adipose tissue, resulting in a loss of body mass while migrating thousands of kilometers and engaging in breeding behaviors (Christiansen et al., 2016).

While most humpback whales, including all age classes and reproductive conditions, do migrate annually between feeding and breeding grounds (e.g., Chittleborough, 1965; Craig et al., 2003; Straley et al., 1994), there is a growing body of evidence that there may not be strict adherence of foraging behavior to only high-latitude habitats and that there may be more plasticity in these behaviors than previously thought. First, as noted earlier there is evidence of feeding along migratory routes in both hemispheres (Baraff et al., 1991; Owen et al., 2024; Stamation et al., 2007; Swingle et al., 1993). Second, behavior and other evidence of foraging, like defecation and stomach contents of stranded whales, have been observed in winter in tropical waters of the eastern Pacific Ocean off Nicaragua (De Weerdt & Ramos, 2020), Ecuador (Garcia Cegarra et al., 2021), and Mexico (Frisch-Jordan et al., 2019; Gendron & Urban, 1993), as well as in the western Atlantic off the coast of Brazil (Bortolotto et al., 2016; Danilewicz et al., 2009; De Sá Alves et al., 2009) and in the Dominican Republic (Baraff et al., 1991). Thus, although documentation of foraging on low-latitude breeding grounds among migrating whales is limited, opportunistic feeding may not be uncommon (De Sá Alves et al., 2009; Gendron & Urban, 1993).

The principal breeding habitat for humpback whales in the North Pacific is the Hawaiian Islands (Barlow et al., 2011), with large numbers of whales traditionally aggregating particularly in the Maui Nui region that includes the islands of Maui, Molokaʻi, Lanai, and Kahoʻolawe (Herman & Antinoja, 1977; Mobley et al., 1999). On the Hawaiian breeding ground, this well-studied population exhibits behaviors such as male song, male–male competition, males escorting females, and females nursing their newborn calves (see Herman, 2017 for a review). Foraging behavior by humpback whales in Hawaiʻi has only rarely been reported anecdotally, including a single apparent feeding lunge by a juvenile whale on a school of Pacific chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus) photographed off Maui in 1989 (Salden, 1989, 1990). Here, we report two recent documented instances of humpback whales lunge feeding on schools of fish and on observations of whale defecation in Hawaiian waters during the winter breeding season.

On January 23, 2023, a collaborative research team representing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary, Syracuse University, and the University of Hawaiʻi at Hilo conducted a mission to deploy instrumented suction-cup data logging tags (CATS, Acousonde & Dtags; see Burgess et al., 1998; Cade et al., 2016; Johnson & Tyack, 2003) on humpback whales off west Maui. A single juvenile-sized (~7–9 m in length) whale was sighted and approached approximately 5.1 km southwest of Olowalu, Maui (20.77°N, 156.65°W). From several hundred meters away, the whale could be seen performing surface lunges, giving the impression of socially engaging with another whale. However, as the research vessel approached closer to attempt to deploy a tag on the whale, the whale performed a distinctive lateral surface feeding lunge <10 m from the bow of the vessel. The whale was observed lunging towards the surface on its right side with its mouth open and its ventral pleats distended, and then closing its mouth once at the surface (Figure 1). A large (~5–8 m diameter) bait ball of darkly colored, slim fish approximately 5–7 cm in length was observed in the location where the whale was feeding (Figure 2). The whale continued to perform feeding lunges after a failed attempt to deploy a tag.

Multiple GoPro video cameras and smartphones were used to film the encounter from the surface and underwater, capturing 13 feeding lunges with an average interval between lunges of 43.3 ± 18.3 s. After about 20 min of feeding, the whale began moving away from the bait ball and was not resighted. We were unable to identify the species of the prey.

Nine days later, on February 1, 2023, the pilot of a commercial helicopter tour operated by GoFly Maui reported an adult-sized whale off the northeast coast of the island of Molokaʻi, near Cape Halawa (21.17°N, 156.71°W) apparently lunge-feeding on a bait ball at the surface. A passenger took photographs of the activity using a digital single-lens reflex camera with a zoom lens and documented two lunge-feeding events. In the resulting sequence of images (Figure 3), the whale can be seen approaching a bait ball of fish from below, at which point the fish begin to scatter at the surface. The whale is then seen engulfing a large portion of the bait ball while lunging laterally on its right side. The images show the whale with its mouth open showing baleen and distended ventral pleats. Following the feeding lunge, the whale can be seen expelling air and water out of the sides of its mouth.

Although documented cases of whales feeding are historically rare on the Hawaiian breeding ground, documentation of whale defecation is more common (Figure 4). Table S1 in the supplementary materials summarizes 27 observed defecation events compiled from the archives of the authors' field notes from 1998 to 2023. Except in rare cases, no collections of fecal materials were made and no analyses of composition were conducted. Defecation events were observed both from the surface and underwater while researchers gathered video and audio data while snorkeling. Defecation was observed during the four principal months (January–April) of the breeding season in both noncompetitive and competitive groups. Both male and female humpback whales occupying various behavioral roles were observed defecating. Defecations were never observed from calves, and only two were from juvenile-sized whales; most were from adult-sized whales (estimated visually). Defecations were observed while whales were slowly traveling as well as when they dove or surfaced. When reported, defecations were brown or brownish green in color, likely reflecting the composition of their prey (e.g., fish). None were red or purple as reported often from humpback whales defecating in the feeding grounds, where the dominant prey is often krill (e.g. Reidy et al., 2022). The consistency of humpback whale feces varied from fine matter in the form of a large dark cloud to, slick-like viscous material, to large cube-like fibrous chunks. In one instance, defecation was associated with a pungent scent at the surface.

The rarity of documented feeding by humpback whales in Hawaiʻi suggests that it is not a common behavior. However, how uncommon it is, remains an open question. The more frequently observed cases of whale defecation dating back to at least 1998 suggests that more feeding may be occurring in Hawaiʻi than is witnessed, although it remains unclear whether feces could simply represent byproducts of adipose tissue metabolism or fish consumed during migration (e.g., Owen et al., 2017). On high latitude feeding grounds, humpback whales are known to influence the health of the ecosystem by cycling important nutrients via their feces, which contribute to local biological productivity (Roman & McCarthy, 2010) and earning them the label of “marine ecosystem engineers” (Roman et al., 2014). If the observed events of defecation do represent feeding while in Hawaiʻi, it suggests similar ecological processes could be occurring and raises some critical questions, namely: what are whales eating, where and when are they eating, and why are they eating while in Hawaiʻi?

To be clear, the answers to these questions are unknown. However, clues exist that could point to answers. Salden (1990) described a juvenile whale lunge-feeding on a school of Pacific chub mackerel. This species is not common in Hawaiʻi, so it is possible that it may instead have been misidentified for the more prevalent mackerel scad (Decapterus macarellus), known in Hawaiʻi as ʻopelu, or bigeye scad (Selar crumenophthalmus), known as akule. ʻOpelu and akule are commonly found in coastal Hawaiian waters. Thus, it is possible that whales may target larger aggregations of these fish under certain circumstances. However, unlike in the two most recent feeding cases, only one feeding lunge was observed by Salden (1990), despite having visually tracked the whale prior to and after the event. So, if they occur, feeding attempts on these species are likely rare and opportunistic.

In the more recent case of feeding observed off Olowalu, Maui, the bait ball was composed of small, slim fish estimated to be approximately 5–7 cm in length and, darkly colored dorsally. These were neither ʻopelu nor akule, which measure approximately 20 cm in length and have bluish or sliver coloration. In winter of 2023 fishermen reported unusually frequent sightings of schools of Hawaiian anchovy (Encrasicholina purpurea), known locally as nehu (Brian Ishida, personal communication, February 21, 2023), that match the description of the fish observed. Another possibility is that these may have been remnant members of the nocturnally present mesopelagic boundary community (MBC; Reid et al., 1991), which migrates from deep offshore waters during the day to shallow coastal waters at night (Benoit-Bird & Au, 2004; Benoit-Bird et al., 2001). Members of the family Myctophidae, which are a major component of the MBC, can also be approximately 5–7 cm in length, darkly colored dorsally, and slim (Benoit-Bird & Au, 2006). Although no direct evidence of whales feeding on the MBC exists, Henderson et al. (2022) report that humpback whales instrumented with satellite-monitored location-dive tags that transited between Hawaiian Islands conducted long, deep dives to depths of 100–300 m during nighttime hours. They hypothesized that whales could be diving to meet the rising MBC, as has been observed in certain odontocete species (Benoit-Bird & Au, 2003; Copeland et al., 2019). This suggestion has also been made by Derville et al. (2020) for humpback whales showing similar diving behavior in New Caledonia.

The question of where and when whales feed in Hawaiʻi is of course related to the species they may be consuming. If feeding is restricted to daytime hours, then opportunistic exploitation of nearby schools of Nehu, ʻopelu, or akule may be the primary circumstance in which feeding takes place. These are likely to be rare, stochastic events not tied to specific locations and probably only occur when a whale is simply in the right place at the right time. On the other hand, if whales target the MBC at night, as speculated by Henderson et al. (2022) and Derville et al. (2020), then this would give them regular opportunities for foraging, since the MBC predictably enters shallow coastal waters in Hawaiʻi nightly (Benoit-Bird & Au, 2003, 2006). If periodic nocturnal feeding does occur, it could help explain the comparatively more common observations of defecation. Future analyses to determine the identification of prey species present in humpback whale fecal samples collected in the Hawaiian breeding grounds (e.g., Reidy et al., 2022), as well as stable isotope analysis of skin/blubber biopsy samples (e.g., Witteveen et al., 2011) could help reveal what humpback whales are consuming in Hawaiian waters.

Why some whales may choose to spend time feeding while in Hawaiʻi is difficult to surmise but may be informed by the age class of the whales observed. Two out of the three cases described or cited here involved juvenile whales. Juveniles have limited body resources to metabolize and thus typically have shorter residency times in the Hawaiian breeding grounds and earlier departures for the breeding grounds than adult males and mothers of newly born calves (Craig et al., 2001, 2003). It may be that, unlike mature adults, which are primarily focused on reproductive behaviors, juveniles may need to spend some time supplementing their energy reserves built up over the summer on high latitude feeding grounds to sustain themselves on the breeding grounds and facilitate their migration back to the feeding grounds. Alternatively, they may simply be more inclined to capitalize on a feeding opportunity. Moreover, this might be more necessary during some years than others, depending on how productive the feeding season was during the summer. Thus, climate factors such as marine heat waves and El Nino/Southern Oscillation events, which influence productivity on the summer feeding grounds (Frankel et al., 2022; Gentemann et al., 2017), could help determine the need for whales to supplement energy reserves while in the breeding grounds.

Although there is much more that needs to be understood about humpback whale feeding behavior in the Hawaiian breeding grounds, the fact that it does occur, coupled with observed defecation, suggests that the whales may be interacting with the local marine ecosystem in ways that have not been previously examined. The extent to which humpback whales are influencing the Hawaiʻi marine ecosystem through feeding and defecation is presently unknown but may be a fruitful area of future research.

Marc O. Lammers: Conceptualization; data curation; investigation; supervision; writing – original draft. Julia Zeh: Conceptualization; investigation; writing – original draft. Adam A. Pack: Conceptualization; data curation; writing – original draft. Eden Zang: Investigation. Ed Lyman: Conceptualization; data curation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在夏威夷繁殖地观察到的座头鲸觅食行为和排泄物
座头鲸(Megaptera novaeangliae)行为的传统范式包括每年在低纬度繁殖地和高纬度摄食地之间迁徙,迁徙期间很少或不摄食(见Owen等人,2017),并且个体在繁殖地禁食(例如,Baker等人,1986;Chittleborough, 1965;克拉珀姆,2000;Dawbin 1966;卡托纳,胡子,1990;参见米哈列夫,1997)。自从在商业捕鲸活动中对胃内容物进行检查以来,座头鲸被认为是饮食上的通才(例如,Clapham等人,1997年)。而在北半球的高纬度地区,座头鲸通常被称为刺食动物,通常食用磷虾(Euphausia sp.)和小型鱼群,如毛鳞鱼(Mallotus villosus)、鲱鱼(Clupea sp.)、沙枪(Ammodytes sp.)和幼年鲑鱼(Oncorhynchus sp.) (Straley等人,2018;萨博,2015;Witteveen et al., 2008, 2011;Reidy et al., 2022)。在南半球,研究人员一直认为座头鲸主要依靠南极磷虾(Euphausia superba;Groß等人,2020)。然而,最近采用稳定同位素技术的数据显示,与北半球座头鲸一样,它们也是多功能型(Bury等人,2024年),它们在迁徙路线上捕食小鱼群,如长尾鲭鱼(Trachurus declivis)、沙丁鱼(Sardinops neopilchardus)和红鱼(Emmelichthy nitidus) (Owen等人,2017年)。主要猎物来源随着位置、海洋温度和生态系统条件的变化而变化,加强了这种饮食灵活性(Fleming等人,2016)。座头鲸和其他须鲸被认为是资本繁殖者,在迁徙和繁殖过程中,它们的代谢需求被认为是通过脂肪组织的分解来满足的,在数千公里的迁徙和繁殖行为中导致体重损失(Christiansen et al., 2016)。虽然大多数座头鲸,包括所有年龄段和生殖条件,每年都会在觅食地和繁殖地之间迁徙(例如,Chittleborough, 1965;Craig et al., 2003;Straley et al., 1994),有越来越多的证据表明,觅食行为可能并不严格遵循高纬度栖息地,这些行为可能比以前认为的更具可塑性。首先,如前所述,有证据表明在两个半球沿迁徙路线进食(Baraff et al., 1991;Owen et al., 2024;station et al., 2007;Swingle et al., 1993)。其次,在尼加拉瓜附近东太平洋的热带水域,人们在冬季观察到搁浅鲸鱼的行为和其他觅食证据,比如排便和胃里的内容物(De Weerdt &amp;Ramos, 2020)、厄瓜多尔(Garcia Cegarra等人,2021)和墨西哥(Frisch-Jordan等人,2019;Gendron,Urban, 1993),以及巴西海岸外的西大西洋(Bortolotto等人,2016;Danilewicz et al., 2009;De sareves et al., 2009)和多米尼加共和国(Baraff et al., 1991)。因此,尽管迁徙鲸鱼在低纬度繁殖地觅食的记录有限,但机会性进食可能并不罕见(De salves et al., 2009;Gendron,城市,1993)。北太平洋座头鲸的主要繁殖栖息地是夏威夷群岛(Barlow et al., 2011),传统上大量鲸鱼聚集在毛伊岛地区,包括毛伊岛、莫洛卡伊岛、拉奈岛和卡霍奥拉维岛(Herman &amp;Antinoja, 1977;Mobley et al., 1999)。在夏威夷的繁殖地,这个经过充分研究的种群表现出雄性鸣叫、雄性竞争、雄性护送雌性以及雌性哺乳新生幼崽等行为(见Herman, 2017年的评论)。座头鲸在夏威夷岛的觅食行为很少有轶事报道,包括1989年在毛伊岛拍摄到的一只幼鲸对一群太平洋鲐鱼(Scomber japonicus)的一次明显的捕食(Salden, 1989,1990)。在这里,我们报告了最近记录的两个座头鲸猛扑鱼群的例子,以及在冬季繁殖季节在夏威夷水域观察到的鲸鱼粪便。2023年1月23日,一个代表美国国家海洋和大气管理局(NOAA)夏威夷群岛座头鲸国家海洋保护区、锡拉丘兹大学和位于希洛的夏威夷大学的合作研究小组执行了一项任务,部署了仪器吸盘数据记录标签(CATS, Acousonde &amp;Dtags;参见Burgess et al., 1998;Cade et al., 2016;约翰逊,Tyack, 2003)在西毛伊岛的座头鲸。在毛伊岛Olowalu西南约5.1公里处(20.77°N, 156.65°W),发现了一只幼鲸(~ 7-9米长)。 从几百米远的地方,可以看到这头鲸鱼在水面上跳来跳去,给人一种与另一头鲸鱼社交的印象。然而,当科考船靠近鲸鱼,试图在鲸鱼身上安装标签时,鲸鱼在距离船艏10米的地方进行了一次独特的侧面捕食。研究人员观察到,鲸鱼张开嘴巴向右侧水面扑去,腹部的皱带膨胀,然后在水面上闭上嘴巴(图1)。在鲸鱼进食的地方,观察到一个大的(直径约5-8米)深色的鱼饵球,细长的鱼长约5-7厘米(图2)。鲸鱼在尝试放置标签失败后,继续进行扑食。研究人员使用多台GoPro摄像机和智能手机从水面和水下拍摄了这一过程,共捕捉到13次进食冲刺,平均间隔时间为43.3±18.3秒。喂食大约20分钟后,鲸鱼开始离开诱饵球,没有被重新安置。我们无法确定猎物的种类。九天之后,也就是2023年2月1日,毛伊岛GoFly运营的一架商业直升机的飞行员报告说,在哈拉瓦角附近的莫洛卡岛东北海岸(北纬21.17°,西经156.71°),有一头成年鲸鱼在水面上捕食一个诱饵球。一名乘客使用带变焦镜头的数码单反相机拍摄了这一活动,并记录了两次冲刺进食事件。在最终的图像序列中(图3),可以看到鲸鱼从下面接近一个鱼饵球,此时鱼开始分散在水面上。然后,可以看到鲸鱼吞食了诱饵球的一大部分,同时向右侧侧身猛冲。图片显示鲸鱼张开嘴,露出鲸须和膨胀的腹褶。在进食后,可以看到鲸鱼从嘴巴两侧排出空气和水。尽管记录在案的鲸鱼进食案例在夏威夷繁殖地历史上很少见,但鲸鱼排便的记录更为常见(图4)。补充材料中的表S1总结了从作者1998年至2023年的实地记录档案中收集的27例观察到的排便事件。除极少数情况外,没有收集粪便材料,也没有进行成分分析。研究人员在浮潜时收集视频和音频数据,同时从水面和水下观察排便事件。在繁殖季节的四个主要月份(1 - 4月),非竞争组和竞争组均观察到排便。观察到雄性和雌性座头鲸占据不同的行为角色排便。从来没有观察到幼鲸排便,只有两只是幼鲸排便;大多数来自成年鲸鱼(从视觉上估计)。在鲸鱼缓慢移动以及潜水或浮出水面时,可以观察到它们排便。当报告时,排便呈棕色或棕绿色,可能反映了它们的猎物(如鱼)的组成。没有一个是红色或紫色的,这是座头鲸在觅食地排便时经常报道的,那里的主要猎物通常是磷虾(例如Reidy等人,2022)。座头鲸粪便的稠度各不相同,从大块黑云状的细物质到光滑状的粘性物质,再到大块立方体状的纤维块。在一个例子中,排便与表面的刺鼻气味有关。在夏威夷,座头鲸进食的罕见记录表明,这不是一种常见的行为。然而,它到底有多罕见,仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。更频繁观察到的鲸鱼排便案例至少可以追溯到1998年,这表明在夏威夷可能发生了比亲眼所见更多的进食,尽管尚不清楚粪便是否只是脂肪组织代谢的副产品,还是迁徙过程中消耗的鱼类(例如,Owen等人,2017)。在高纬度的觅食地,座头鲸通过粪便循环重要的营养物质,从而影响生态系统的健康,这有助于当地的生物生产力(Roman &amp;McCarthy, 2010),并为他们赢得了“海洋生态系统工程师”的标签(Roman et al., 2014)。如果观察到的排便事件确实代表了在夏威夷岛的进食,这表明类似的生态过程可能正在发生,并提出了一些关键问题,即:鲸鱼吃什么,何时何地吃,以及为什么它们在夏威夷岛吃?需要明确的是,这些问题的答案是未知的。然而,存在一些线索可以指向答案。Salden(1990)描述了一只幼鲸捕食一群太平洋鲐鱼。 这个物种在夏威夷并不常见,所以它可能被误认为是更普遍的鲭鱼(Decapterus macarellus),在夏威夷被称为夏威夷opelu,或大眼鱼(Selar crumenophthalmus),被称为akule。欧佩卢和阿库勒通常在夏威夷沿海水域发现。因此,在某些情况下,鲸鱼可能会瞄准这些鱼类的更大群体。然而,与最近的两个进食案例不同的是,Salden(1990)只观察到一次进食冲刺,尽管他在事件前后都对鲸鱼进行了视觉跟踪。所以,如果它们发生了,对这些物种的喂食尝试可能是罕见的和机会主义的。在毛伊岛的Olowalu附近观察到的最近的喂食案例中,诱饵球由小而纤细的鱼组成,估计长度约为5-7厘米,背部颜色深。它们既不是欧佩鲁也不是阿库勒,它们的长度约为20厘米,呈蓝色或银色。在2023年的冬天,渔民们报告说,他们异常频繁地看到夏威夷凤尾鱼(Encrasicholina purpurea),在当地被称为nehu (Brian Ishida,个人通讯,2023年2月21日),这与观察到的鱼的描述相符。另一种可能性是,这些可能是夜间出现的中远洋边界群落(MBC;Reid et al., 1991),白天从近海深水区迁移到夜间的近海浅水区(Benoit-Bird &amp;盟,2004;Benoit-Bird et al., 2001)。作为MBC的主要组成部分,霉蝇科的成员也可以长约5-7厘米,背部颜色深,身材苗条(benoitbird &amp;盟,2006)。虽然没有鲸鱼在MBC上进食的直接证据,但Henderson等人(2022)报告说,座头鲸在夜间通过卫星监测的位置潜水标签在夏威夷群岛之间穿梭,进行了长时间的深潜,深度为100-300米。他们假设鲸鱼可能会潜入水中,与上升的MBC相遇,就像在某些齿齿动物物种中观察到的那样(贝努特鸟&amp;盟,2003;Copeland et al., 2019)。Derville等人(2020)也对新喀里多尼亚表现出类似潜水行为的座头鲸提出了这一建议。鲸鱼在夏威夷何时何地进食的问题当然与它们可能食用的物种有关。如果取食仅限于白天,那么机会性地利用附近的Nehu、haopelu或akule鱼群可能是取食的主要环境。这些可能是罕见的随机事件,与特定地点无关,可能只发生在鲸鱼在正确的时间出现在正确的地点时。另一方面,正如Henderson等人(2022)和Derville等人(2020)推测的那样,如果鲸鱼在夜间以MBC为目标,那么这将为它们提供定期觅食的机会,因为MBC可以预见地在夜间进入夏威夷岛的浅海沿岸水域(benoite - bird &amp;Au, 2003, 2006)。如果夜间进食确实存在,这就有助于解释相对更常见的排便现象。未来的分析,以确定在夏威夷繁殖地收集的座头鲸粪便样本中存在的猎物种类(例如,Reidy等人,2022),以及皮肤/鲸脂活检样本的稳定同位素分析(例如,Witteveen等人,2011),可以帮助揭示夏威夷水域座头鲸的消费。为什么有些鲸鱼会选择在夏威夷花时间进食,这很难推测,但可能会从观察到的鲸鱼的年龄类别中得到信息。这里所描述或引用的三个案例中有两个涉及幼鲸。幼鲸体内代谢资源有限,因此通常比成年雄鲸和新生幼鲸的母亲在夏威夷繁殖地停留的时间更短,离开繁殖地的时间也更早(Craig et al., 2001,2003)。这可能是因为,与主要专注于繁殖行为的成年鱼不同,幼鱼可能需要花一些时间补充夏天在高纬度觅食地积累的能量储备,以维持自己在繁殖地的生存,并促进它们返回觅食地的迁徙。或者,它们可能只是更倾向于利用喂食的机会。此外,这可能在某些年份比其他年份更有必要,这取决于夏季喂养季节的产量。因此,气候因素,如海洋热浪和厄尔尼诺/南方涛动事件,会影响夏季取食地的生产力(Frankel等人,2022;genemann et al., 2017),可以帮助确定鲸鱼在繁殖地补充能量储备的需求。 虽然关于夏威夷繁殖地座头鲸的进食行为还有很多需要了解的地方,但事实是,它确实发生了,再加上观察到的排便,表明鲸鱼可能以以前没有研究过的方式与当地海洋生态系统相互作用。座头鲸通过进食和排便影响夏威夷夏威夷海洋生态系统的程度目前尚不清楚,但可能是未来研究的一个富有成果的领域。Marc O. Lammers:概念化;数据管理;调查;监督;写作-原稿。Julia Zeh:概念化;调查;写作-原稿。亚当·帕克:概念化;数据管理;写作-原稿。Eden Zang:调查。Ed Lyman:概念化;数据管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Mammal Science
Marine Mammal Science 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published for the Society for Marine Mammalogy, Marine Mammal Science is a source of significant new findings on marine mammals resulting from original research on their form and function, evolution, systematics, physiology, biochemistry, behavior, population biology, life history, genetics, ecology and conservation. The journal features both original and review articles, notes, opinions and letters. It serves as a vital resource for anyone studying marine mammals.
期刊最新文献
Applying the Ecological Trap Concept to Cetaceans Predicting Individual Body Length, Volume, and Mass From Dominant Stroke Cycle Frequency in Sperm Whales: Empirical Cross-Validation and Prediction Functions Predicting Individual Body Length, Volume, and Mass From Dominant Stroke Cycle Frequency in Sperm Whales: Empirical Cross-Validation and Prediction Functions Stock Identity of Stranded Tamanend's Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops erebennus) With Evidence of Fisheries Interaction in Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, 1996–2019 Stock Identity of Stranded Tamanend's Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops erebennus) With Evidence of Fisheries Interaction in Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, 1996–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1