Gordon B. Bauer, Peter F. Cook, Heidi E. Harley, Jason Bruck, Mel Cosentino, Charles J. Deutsch, Nicola Erdsack, Wendi Fellner, Tabitha Gunnars, Heather Manitzas Hill, Sonia V. Kumar, Malin K. Lilley, Katherine A. McHugh, Jennifer Moore, Juliana R. Moron, Andrea Ravignani, Roger L. Reep, Athena M. Rycyk, Laela S. Sayigh, Anikó Szegedi, Christina Toms, Randall S. Wells
Cognition is an animal's real-time adaptation system for responding to change. Rapid environmental change, often anthropogenic, is expanding the range and severity of challenges confronting wild animals. Effective conservation requires a multifaceted approach that includes animals' capacities. Large-brained, long-lived animals such as marine mammals often have extensive capability to adaptively modify their behavior due to their cognition, which comprises the mechanisms of information acquisition, processing, and flexible action. Consequently, current behavior need not be a final predictor of future behavior for these animals. This flexibility provides an underutilized and under examined point of leverage for humans interested in improving life outcomes for wild animals. In this team-written, interdisciplinary paper, we argue that application of cognitive approaches may facilitate many conservation efforts directed toward marine mammals. Starting with a workshop on this topic at the 24th Biennial Conference on the Biology of Marine Mammals, scientists representing a wide range of disciplinary expertise addressed eight different conservation concerns for six marine mammal species and provided potential cognitive explanations of and interventions aimed at related behavior. Our treatment highlights the value of integrated laboratory and field research, and the importance of tight lines of communication between scientists and conservation managers.
{"title":"Exploring Marine Mammal Cognition as a Conservation Tool","authors":"Gordon B. Bauer, Peter F. Cook, Heidi E. Harley, Jason Bruck, Mel Cosentino, Charles J. Deutsch, Nicola Erdsack, Wendi Fellner, Tabitha Gunnars, Heather Manitzas Hill, Sonia V. Kumar, Malin K. Lilley, Katherine A. McHugh, Jennifer Moore, Juliana R. Moron, Andrea Ravignani, Roger L. Reep, Athena M. Rycyk, Laela S. Sayigh, Anikó Szegedi, Christina Toms, Randall S. Wells","doi":"10.1111/mms.70114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.70114","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cognition is an animal's real-time adaptation system for responding to change. Rapid environmental change, often anthropogenic, is expanding the range and severity of challenges confronting wild animals. Effective conservation requires a multifaceted approach that includes animals' capacities. Large-brained, long-lived animals such as marine mammals often have extensive capability to adaptively modify their behavior due to their cognition, which comprises the mechanisms of information acquisition, processing, and flexible action. Consequently, current behavior need not be a final predictor of future behavior for these animals. This flexibility provides an underutilized and under examined point of leverage for humans interested in improving life outcomes for wild animals. In this team-written, interdisciplinary paper, we argue that application of cognitive approaches may facilitate many conservation efforts directed toward marine mammals. Starting with a workshop on this topic at the 24th Biennial Conference on the Biology of Marine Mammals, scientists representing a wide range of disciplinary expertise addressed eight different conservation concerns for six marine mammal species and provided potential cognitive explanations of and interventions aimed at related behavior. Our treatment highlights the value of integrated laboratory and field research, and the importance of tight lines of communication between scientists and conservation managers.</p>","PeriodicalId":18725,"journal":{"name":"Marine Mammal Science","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mms.70114","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146140016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Selina Agbayani, David A. S. Rosen, Andrew W. Trites
Eastern North Pacific gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) rely on energy obtained from Arctic feeding grounds to complete their 15,000–20,000 km annual round-trip migration between feeding and breeding areas. However, quantitative estimates of their food requirements remain scarce. Using an age-structured bioenergetics model incorporating life cycle stages and migration timings, we estimated daily energy needs across life stages. We found females need to supply nursing calves with 24–35 L of milk per day for 9–10 months. After weaning, juveniles require ~400 kg per day of Arctic amphipods (~5.6% of body weight), while the largest adults need a minimum of ~1000 kg per day (~5.4%) during the 154-day summer foraging period. In contrast, pregnant females need 1600–1900 kg of prey per day (~9%–10%) to support fetal growth and store sufficient energy to produce milk while fasting and traveling northbound after calving in Mexico. Upon returning to their Arctic feeding grounds, lactating females require 1300–1600 kg of prey per day (7.9%–8.6%) for another 3.6 months to support the high costs of milk production. These estimates provide a quantitative framework for assessing how changes in Arctic prey availability can affect gray whale health, fitness, reproductive success, and population trends.
{"title":"Gray Whale Energy Requirements","authors":"Selina Agbayani, David A. S. Rosen, Andrew W. Trites","doi":"10.1111/mms.70119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.70119","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Eastern North Pacific gray whales (<i>Eschrichtius robustus</i>) rely on energy obtained from Arctic feeding grounds to complete their 15,000–20,000 km annual round-trip migration between feeding and breeding areas. However, quantitative estimates of their food requirements remain scarce. Using an age-structured bioenergetics model incorporating life cycle stages and migration timings, we estimated daily energy needs across life stages. We found females need to supply nursing calves with 24–35 L of milk per day for 9–10 months. After weaning, juveniles require ~400 kg per day of Arctic amphipods (~5.6% of body weight), while the largest adults need a minimum of ~1000 kg per day (~5.4%) during the 154-day summer foraging period. In contrast, pregnant females need 1600–1900 kg of prey per day (~9%–10%) to support fetal growth and store sufficient energy to produce milk while fasting and traveling northbound after calving in Mexico. Upon returning to their Arctic feeding grounds, lactating females require 1300–1600 kg of prey per day (7.9%–8.6%) for another 3.6 months to support the high costs of milk production. These estimates provide a quantitative framework for assessing how changes in Arctic prey availability can affect gray whale health, fitness, reproductive success, and population trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":18725,"journal":{"name":"Marine Mammal Science","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mms.70119","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}