The first record of the southbound movements of satellite-tagged pygmy blue whales (B. m. brevicauda) from Savu Sea (Indonesia) to the subantarctic waters

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q2 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Marine Mammal Science Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1111/mms.13167
Putu Liza Kusuma Mustika, I Made Jaya Ratha, Edy Setyawan, Muhammad Offal Prinanda, Rusydi Rusydi, Februanty Suyatiningsih Purnomo, Imam Fauzi
{"title":"The first record of the southbound movements of satellite-tagged pygmy blue whales (B. m. brevicauda) from Savu Sea (Indonesia) to the subantarctic waters","authors":"Putu Liza Kusuma Mustika,&nbsp;I Made Jaya Ratha,&nbsp;Edy Setyawan,&nbsp;Muhammad Offal Prinanda,&nbsp;Rusydi Rusydi,&nbsp;Februanty Suyatiningsih Purnomo,&nbsp;Imam Fauzi","doi":"10.1111/mms.13167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pygmy blue whales (<i>Balaenoptera musculus brevicauda</i>) are known to conduct annual migrations between the southern and western waters of Australia to the Banda Sea via the Savu Sea in Indonesia (Double et al., <span>2014</span>; Möller et al., <span>2020</span>). However, the journey back to Australian waters is rarely documented, often due to limited battery life of satellite tags deployed in Australian waters or inadequate funding to conduct satellite tracking studies originating in the Indonesian waters.</p><p>The pygmy blue whale subspecies is one of the four known subspecies of blue whales (<i>B. musculus</i>); the other ones are the Northern blue whale (<i>B. m. musculus</i>), the Antarctic blue whale (<i>B. m. intermedia</i>), and the Northern Indian Ocean blue whale (<i>B. m. indica</i>) (Branch et al., <span>2007</span>; Leslie et al., <span>2020</span>; Samaran et al., <span>2013</span>). A possible fifth subspecies has been observed off Chile (Branch et al., <span>2007</span>; Leslie et al., <span>2020</span>; Samaran et al., <span>2013</span>), but it has not been officially recognized. The Australian population of pygmy blue whales has been shown to conduct regular migrations between the southern and western waters of Australia, the Savu Sea, Timor Sea, and Banda Sea (Double et al., <span>2014</span>; Möller et al., <span>2020</span>), while some videos uploaded in September 2016 and November 2018 suggest that the Banda Sea might be an important nursing ground for this subspecies (Pindito, <span>2016</span>, <span>2018</span>). In the Timor Sea, the Timor Trough south of Timor-Leste was identified as a likely feeding area for pygmy blue whales during the late austral winter and early austral spring (Burton et al., <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Between 2009 and 2021, 37 pygmy blue whales were tagged in western or southern Australian waters (Double et al., <span>2014</span>; Möller et al., <span>2020</span>; Owen et al., <span>2016</span>; Thums et al., <span>2022</span>). All tagged whales exhibited the northbound migration towards the Indonesian waters (Double et al., <span>2014</span>; Möller et al., <span>2020</span>). Most of the whales migrated to the Banda Sea via the Savu Sea or Timor Sea, although one whale was not recorded to migrate to the Banda Sea and migrated to south Java instead (Möller et al., <span>2020</span>).</p><p>The satellite tagging data suggest that the southbound migration back to the Australian waters started in mid-September 2020 (Thums et al., <span>2022</span>). Nonetheless, only four satellite tracks were available for the return journeys of the whales to the tagging sites: ID98135 from Double et al. (<span>2014</span>), ID123229 and ID123233 from Möller et al. (<span>2020</span>), and ID 182657 from Thums et al. (<span>2022</span>).</p><p>Here we report the results of the first two Australian pygmy blue whales satellite-tagged in their wintering area: (1) a full migration between Indonesia and the southern waters of Australia, and (2) a southbound movement from Indonesia to the subantarctic waters. We deployed satellite tags on two pygmy blue whales during a survey from November 5 to 19, 2021, near Semau Island in the Savu Sea, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia (Figure 1) with the <i>Pindito</i>, a 40-m liveaboard vessel. The research team only approached single animals and specifically avoided mother and calf pairs. The team approached the whales with the <i>Pindito</i>'s zodiac boat. No length measurements were taken of the two whales. However, based on the photographic comparison between the whales and the Zodiac boat (5.5 m), we estimated the whales' lengths to be 18–19 m.</p><p>We attached SPLASH10-302 and SPLASH10-373 satellite tags (Wildlife Computers, Redmond, WA) to the two pygmy blue whales in this study (Table 1). The SPLASH10-373 tag was deployed on Whale#1 on November 16, 2021, while the SPLASH10-302 was deployed on Whale#2 on November 19, 2021, in the Savu Sea Marine Park (Figure 1, Table 1).</p><p>We programmed both tags to collect ARGOS locations and transmit these locations every time the tagged whales came to the sea surface, as well as to collect depth (m) and ambient sea temperature (°C) every 10 min. We binned depth data into 14 bins: 0–5, 6–20, 21–50, 51–100, 101–200, 201–300, 301–400, 401–500, 501–600, 601–700, 701–800, 801–1,000, 1,000–1,500, and &gt;1,500 m. The temperature data were also binned into 14 bins with the upper limits of 5, 10, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and &gt; 30°C.</p><p>Data collected by the satellite tags were transmitted to Wildlife Computers data portal via the ARGOS satellite network. The ARGOS location data, specifically, were obtained irregularly, depending on when and how long the tagged whales spent time on the surface. Given the irregularity of ARGOS position data, we fitted a state-space model (SSM) on these ARGOS position data to estimate the most likely tracks of movements of each tagged whale. The SSM was done using the “aniMotum” package (Jonsen et al., <span>2023</span>) in R (R Core Team, <span>2022</span>). We fitted a time-varying move persistence model with a 24-hr time step to generate the most likely locations every 24 hr. We calculated movement velocities of tagged whales using the “move” package (Kranstauber et al., <span>2021</span>) based on the most likely locations as predicted using SSM. We used move persistence indices, ranging from 0 to 1, to examine the likely behaviors of the tagged whales during the tracking period (Florko et al., <span>2023</span>; Jonsen et al., <span>2019</span>). Indicative of area-restricted search (ARS) behaviors (Florko et al., <span>2023</span>), a low move persistence index (≤0.75) represents the likelihood of foraging or resting, while a high move persistence index (&gt;0.75) indicates transiting or traveling behaviors (Jonsen et al., <span>2019</span>).</p><p>Immediately after being tagged, the two satellite-tagged pygmy blue whales traveled from the Savu Sea Marine Park (Indonesia) towards the western waters of Australia (Figure 2). Whale#1 cruised close to the coasts of Western Australia. The closest point, recorded on November 27, 2021, was approximately 50 km from the northern tip of the North West Cape (21.29°S, 114.09°E). From there, Whale#1 resumed the journey southwards and turning eastwards off Augusta (Western Australia) on December 7, 2021, reaching the closest estimated point to Australian coast with a distance of &lt;30 km, towards the southern waters of Australia. On December 30, 2021, at 39.11°S, 123.43°E (about 500 km south of Esperance, Western Australia), Whale#1 stopped moving eastwards and started moving southwards and southeastwards. For the following 3.5 months (until April 16, 2022), Whale#1 moved through the waters between 37°S–49°S and 103°E–123°E, south of the Great Australian Bight, just outside of Australia's Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). This region is located in the Southern Subtropical Convergence Zone, between the Subtropical Front and the Subantarctic Front (Figure 2). On March 13, 2022, Whale#1 reached the westernmost point of its track and then headed north, leaving the Subtropical Front on April 16, 2022. Between 29 April and May 9, 2022, the whale explored the waters of Shark Bay, Western Australia before continuing its journey towards Indonesian waters. The whale's last location was on June 1, 2022, at 11.84°S, 121.3°E, just before it entered the Savu Sea. Overall, Whale#1 was tracked for 198 days, with a total distance of 13,683 km and an average velocity of 69.1 km/day (Table 1).</p><p>In contrast, the travel direction of Whale#2 was more linear than Whale#1 (Figure 2). After tagging, Whale#2 cruised along the western edge of Australian waters before continuing southwest towards Heard and McDonalds Islands. Whale#2 was tracked for 59 days from November 19, 2021, to January 16, 2022 (Table 1). The last satellite transmission was located 500 km in the northeast of the Kerguelen Islands and Heard and McDonalds Islands, just to the north of the Subantarctic Front (46.5°S, 84.9°E). This position was the westernmost location in this study (Figure 2). While being tracked, Whale#2 reached a total distance of 5,953 km with an average velocity of 100.9 km/day.</p><p>During the 198 days of tracking, Whale#1 showed various behaviors as indicated by the move persistence index (Figure 2). Whale#1 showed a high move persistence index along the track between the Savu Sea and the south of Western Australia, suggesting a travelling behavior. On December 10, 2021, after approximately 3 weeks of traveling, Whale#1 started to show area restricted search (ARS; Möller et al., <span>2020</span>) behaviors as indicated by the low move persistence index (≤0.75; Jonsen et al., <span>2019</span>), which suggests foraging and/or resting behaviors (Florko et al., <span>2023</span>; Möller et al., <span>2020</span>). During the following four months until April 14, 2022, Whale#1 mostly exhibited the ARS behaviors between 37°S–49°S and 103°E–123°E, outside of Australia's EEZ, between the Subtropical Front and the Subantarctic Front. On the way back to Indonesia, Whale#1 generally showed traveling behavior as indicated by the high move persistence index. This whale demonstrated ARS behaviors around Shark Bay and areas in the north of Exmouth. Contrary to Whale#1, Whale#2 consistently demonstrated traveling behavior as indicated by the high move persistence index (&gt;0.75; Jonsen et al., <span>2019</span>) for 59 days before the tag stopped transmitting on January 16, 2022.</p><p>Whale#1 spent more than 85% of its time at depths of 0–50 m (Figure 3a) while Whale#2 spent almost 75% of its time at depths of 0–20 m (Figure 3b). Both whales spent about 10% of their time at depths of 51–100 m and up to 3% of their time at depths of 101–200 m (Figure 3a). The maximum dive depth of Whale#1 was 456 ± 4 m, occurring on December 21, 2021, at 38.13°S, 120.99°E, 420 km in the south of Western Australia, while the maximum recorded dive depth for Whale#2 was 312 ± 4 m, occurring on December 17, 2021, at 31.78°S, 102.19°E, nearly 1,300 km to the west of Western Australia (Table 1).</p><p>Despite the incomplete data transmission, we were able to examine 93 out of 198 tracking days and 33 out of 59 tracking days for the diving behaviors of Whale#1 and Whale#2, respectively. The daily diving depths of Whale#1 varied during the tracking period. During the first few days of the tracking period, Whale#1 mostly dived to depths of 0–20 m (Figure 4a). From mid to end of December 2021, this whale dived quite frequently beyond the depths of 200 m south of Western Australia, between Australia's EEZ and the Subtropical Front. From early January 2022 to early February 2022, the whale dived more frequently to between 50 m and 100 m, around the Subtropical Front. As the whale moved southwestwards to areas around the Subantarctic Front, the whale dived more frequently to shallower waters (21–50 m). Like Whale#1, Whale#2 mostly dived to shallower depths of 0–20 m deep from November 2021 to mid-January 2022 (Figure 4b). In mid-December 2021, after reaching the 30°S, Whale#2 started to dive deeper than 200 m more frequently.</p><p>After 13,600 km of travel, the transmission of Whale#1 ended in the waters south of the Savu Sea where it was tagged six months prior. To our knowledge, this journey would be the second longest migration journey of a blue whale, second after the journey of a blue whale tagged in the waters of South Australia with 15,120 km journey in 271 days (Möller et al., <span>2020</span>). The shallow dives and high average velocity of Whale#2 suggests that it had not arrived at its destination in the summering ground when the satellite transmission stopped (Table 1). The Whale#2 trajectory supports the hypothesis that the home range of the Australian population of pygmy blue whales might include the Kerguelen Plateau (Samaran et al., <span>2010</span>, <span>2013</span>), but it is inconclusive due to the sample size of one.</p><p>The horizontal movements of the two pygmy blue whales overlapped with historical blue whale whaling points (Figure 5) and the satellite tracks of two other great whale species. Whale#1's tracks overlapped with the satellite tracks of the southern right whales (<i>Eubalaena australis</i>) tagged at the Australian and New Zealand wintering grounds (Mackay et al., <span>2020</span>), while Whale#2's tracks overlapped with those of the humpback whales (<i>Megaptera novaeangliae</i>) tagged at the waters of Western Australia (Bestley et al., <span>2019</span>).</p><p>This study suggests an extended habitat range of the Australian pygmy blue whales. Nonetheless, since the data are derived from just two individuals, these findings are preliminary in nature and cannot be extrapolated to inform a general migratory pattern from the Savu Sea to the subantarctic waters. Therefore, more satellite tags need to be deployed to southward-migrating pygmy blue whales from these Indonesian seas to confirm whether the subantarctic waters are indeed regular migratory routes of the pygmy blue whales originating from the Banda Sea in Indonesia.</p><p><b>Putu Liza Kusuma Mustika:</b> Conceptualization; formal analysis; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; project administration; resources; supervision; validation; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>I Made Ratha:</b> Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; project administration; resources; validation; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Edy Setyawan:</b> Data curation; formal analysis; methodology; resources; software; validation; visualization; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Muhammad Offal Prinanda:</b> Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; project administration; resources; writing – review and editing. <b>Rusydi Rusydi:</b> Investigation; methodology; writing – review and editing. <b>Februanty Suyatiningsih Purnomo:</b> Methodology; project administration; writing – review and editing. <b>Imam Fauzi:</b> Supervision; writing – review and editing.</p>","PeriodicalId":18725,"journal":{"name":"Marine Mammal Science","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mms.13167","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Mammal Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mms.13167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pygmy blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus brevicauda) are known to conduct annual migrations between the southern and western waters of Australia to the Banda Sea via the Savu Sea in Indonesia (Double et al., 2014; Möller et al., 2020). However, the journey back to Australian waters is rarely documented, often due to limited battery life of satellite tags deployed in Australian waters or inadequate funding to conduct satellite tracking studies originating in the Indonesian waters.

The pygmy blue whale subspecies is one of the four known subspecies of blue whales (B. musculus); the other ones are the Northern blue whale (B. m. musculus), the Antarctic blue whale (B. m. intermedia), and the Northern Indian Ocean blue whale (B. m. indica) (Branch et al., 2007; Leslie et al., 2020; Samaran et al., 2013). A possible fifth subspecies has been observed off Chile (Branch et al., 2007; Leslie et al., 2020; Samaran et al., 2013), but it has not been officially recognized. The Australian population of pygmy blue whales has been shown to conduct regular migrations between the southern and western waters of Australia, the Savu Sea, Timor Sea, and Banda Sea (Double et al., 2014; Möller et al., 2020), while some videos uploaded in September 2016 and November 2018 suggest that the Banda Sea might be an important nursing ground for this subspecies (Pindito, 2016, 2018). In the Timor Sea, the Timor Trough south of Timor-Leste was identified as a likely feeding area for pygmy blue whales during the late austral winter and early austral spring (Burton et al., 2023).

Between 2009 and 2021, 37 pygmy blue whales were tagged in western or southern Australian waters (Double et al., 2014; Möller et al., 2020; Owen et al., 2016; Thums et al., 2022). All tagged whales exhibited the northbound migration towards the Indonesian waters (Double et al., 2014; Möller et al., 2020). Most of the whales migrated to the Banda Sea via the Savu Sea or Timor Sea, although one whale was not recorded to migrate to the Banda Sea and migrated to south Java instead (Möller et al., 2020).

The satellite tagging data suggest that the southbound migration back to the Australian waters started in mid-September 2020 (Thums et al., 2022). Nonetheless, only four satellite tracks were available for the return journeys of the whales to the tagging sites: ID98135 from Double et al. (2014), ID123229 and ID123233 from Möller et al. (2020), and ID 182657 from Thums et al. (2022).

Here we report the results of the first two Australian pygmy blue whales satellite-tagged in their wintering area: (1) a full migration between Indonesia and the southern waters of Australia, and (2) a southbound movement from Indonesia to the subantarctic waters. We deployed satellite tags on two pygmy blue whales during a survey from November 5 to 19, 2021, near Semau Island in the Savu Sea, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia (Figure 1) with the Pindito, a 40-m liveaboard vessel. The research team only approached single animals and specifically avoided mother and calf pairs. The team approached the whales with the Pindito's zodiac boat. No length measurements were taken of the two whales. However, based on the photographic comparison between the whales and the Zodiac boat (5.5 m), we estimated the whales' lengths to be 18–19 m.

We attached SPLASH10-302 and SPLASH10-373 satellite tags (Wildlife Computers, Redmond, WA) to the two pygmy blue whales in this study (Table 1). The SPLASH10-373 tag was deployed on Whale#1 on November 16, 2021, while the SPLASH10-302 was deployed on Whale#2 on November 19, 2021, in the Savu Sea Marine Park (Figure 1, Table 1).

We programmed both tags to collect ARGOS locations and transmit these locations every time the tagged whales came to the sea surface, as well as to collect depth (m) and ambient sea temperature (°C) every 10 min. We binned depth data into 14 bins: 0–5, 6–20, 21–50, 51–100, 101–200, 201–300, 301–400, 401–500, 501–600, 601–700, 701–800, 801–1,000, 1,000–1,500, and >1,500 m. The temperature data were also binned into 14 bins with the upper limits of 5, 10, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and > 30°C.

Data collected by the satellite tags were transmitted to Wildlife Computers data portal via the ARGOS satellite network. The ARGOS location data, specifically, were obtained irregularly, depending on when and how long the tagged whales spent time on the surface. Given the irregularity of ARGOS position data, we fitted a state-space model (SSM) on these ARGOS position data to estimate the most likely tracks of movements of each tagged whale. The SSM was done using the “aniMotum” package (Jonsen et al., 2023) in R (R Core Team, 2022). We fitted a time-varying move persistence model with a 24-hr time step to generate the most likely locations every 24 hr. We calculated movement velocities of tagged whales using the “move” package (Kranstauber et al., 2021) based on the most likely locations as predicted using SSM. We used move persistence indices, ranging from 0 to 1, to examine the likely behaviors of the tagged whales during the tracking period (Florko et al., 2023; Jonsen et al., 2019). Indicative of area-restricted search (ARS) behaviors (Florko et al., 2023), a low move persistence index (≤0.75) represents the likelihood of foraging or resting, while a high move persistence index (>0.75) indicates transiting or traveling behaviors (Jonsen et al., 2019).

Immediately after being tagged, the two satellite-tagged pygmy blue whales traveled from the Savu Sea Marine Park (Indonesia) towards the western waters of Australia (Figure 2). Whale#1 cruised close to the coasts of Western Australia. The closest point, recorded on November 27, 2021, was approximately 50 km from the northern tip of the North West Cape (21.29°S, 114.09°E). From there, Whale#1 resumed the journey southwards and turning eastwards off Augusta (Western Australia) on December 7, 2021, reaching the closest estimated point to Australian coast with a distance of <30 km, towards the southern waters of Australia. On December 30, 2021, at 39.11°S, 123.43°E (about 500 km south of Esperance, Western Australia), Whale#1 stopped moving eastwards and started moving southwards and southeastwards. For the following 3.5 months (until April 16, 2022), Whale#1 moved through the waters between 37°S–49°S and 103°E–123°E, south of the Great Australian Bight, just outside of Australia's Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). This region is located in the Southern Subtropical Convergence Zone, between the Subtropical Front and the Subantarctic Front (Figure 2). On March 13, 2022, Whale#1 reached the westernmost point of its track and then headed north, leaving the Subtropical Front on April 16, 2022. Between 29 April and May 9, 2022, the whale explored the waters of Shark Bay, Western Australia before continuing its journey towards Indonesian waters. The whale's last location was on June 1, 2022, at 11.84°S, 121.3°E, just before it entered the Savu Sea. Overall, Whale#1 was tracked for 198 days, with a total distance of 13,683 km and an average velocity of 69.1 km/day (Table 1).

In contrast, the travel direction of Whale#2 was more linear than Whale#1 (Figure 2). After tagging, Whale#2 cruised along the western edge of Australian waters before continuing southwest towards Heard and McDonalds Islands. Whale#2 was tracked for 59 days from November 19, 2021, to January 16, 2022 (Table 1). The last satellite transmission was located 500 km in the northeast of the Kerguelen Islands and Heard and McDonalds Islands, just to the north of the Subantarctic Front (46.5°S, 84.9°E). This position was the westernmost location in this study (Figure 2). While being tracked, Whale#2 reached a total distance of 5,953 km with an average velocity of 100.9 km/day.

During the 198 days of tracking, Whale#1 showed various behaviors as indicated by the move persistence index (Figure 2). Whale#1 showed a high move persistence index along the track between the Savu Sea and the south of Western Australia, suggesting a travelling behavior. On December 10, 2021, after approximately 3 weeks of traveling, Whale#1 started to show area restricted search (ARS; Möller et al., 2020) behaviors as indicated by the low move persistence index (≤0.75; Jonsen et al., 2019), which suggests foraging and/or resting behaviors (Florko et al., 2023; Möller et al., 2020). During the following four months until April 14, 2022, Whale#1 mostly exhibited the ARS behaviors between 37°S–49°S and 103°E–123°E, outside of Australia's EEZ, between the Subtropical Front and the Subantarctic Front. On the way back to Indonesia, Whale#1 generally showed traveling behavior as indicated by the high move persistence index. This whale demonstrated ARS behaviors around Shark Bay and areas in the north of Exmouth. Contrary to Whale#1, Whale#2 consistently demonstrated traveling behavior as indicated by the high move persistence index (>0.75; Jonsen et al., 2019) for 59 days before the tag stopped transmitting on January 16, 2022.

Whale#1 spent more than 85% of its time at depths of 0–50 m (Figure 3a) while Whale#2 spent almost 75% of its time at depths of 0–20 m (Figure 3b). Both whales spent about 10% of their time at depths of 51–100 m and up to 3% of their time at depths of 101–200 m (Figure 3a). The maximum dive depth of Whale#1 was 456 ± 4 m, occurring on December 21, 2021, at 38.13°S, 120.99°E, 420 km in the south of Western Australia, while the maximum recorded dive depth for Whale#2 was 312 ± 4 m, occurring on December 17, 2021, at 31.78°S, 102.19°E, nearly 1,300 km to the west of Western Australia (Table 1).

Despite the incomplete data transmission, we were able to examine 93 out of 198 tracking days and 33 out of 59 tracking days for the diving behaviors of Whale#1 and Whale#2, respectively. The daily diving depths of Whale#1 varied during the tracking period. During the first few days of the tracking period, Whale#1 mostly dived to depths of 0–20 m (Figure 4a). From mid to end of December 2021, this whale dived quite frequently beyond the depths of 200 m south of Western Australia, between Australia's EEZ and the Subtropical Front. From early January 2022 to early February 2022, the whale dived more frequently to between 50 m and 100 m, around the Subtropical Front. As the whale moved southwestwards to areas around the Subantarctic Front, the whale dived more frequently to shallower waters (21–50 m). Like Whale#1, Whale#2 mostly dived to shallower depths of 0–20 m deep from November 2021 to mid-January 2022 (Figure 4b). In mid-December 2021, after reaching the 30°S, Whale#2 started to dive deeper than 200 m more frequently.

After 13,600 km of travel, the transmission of Whale#1 ended in the waters south of the Savu Sea where it was tagged six months prior. To our knowledge, this journey would be the second longest migration journey of a blue whale, second after the journey of a blue whale tagged in the waters of South Australia with 15,120 km journey in 271 days (Möller et al., 2020). The shallow dives and high average velocity of Whale#2 suggests that it had not arrived at its destination in the summering ground when the satellite transmission stopped (Table 1). The Whale#2 trajectory supports the hypothesis that the home range of the Australian population of pygmy blue whales might include the Kerguelen Plateau (Samaran et al., 2010, 2013), but it is inconclusive due to the sample size of one.

The horizontal movements of the two pygmy blue whales overlapped with historical blue whale whaling points (Figure 5) and the satellite tracks of two other great whale species. Whale#1's tracks overlapped with the satellite tracks of the southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) tagged at the Australian and New Zealand wintering grounds (Mackay et al., 2020), while Whale#2's tracks overlapped with those of the humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) tagged at the waters of Western Australia (Bestley et al., 2019).

This study suggests an extended habitat range of the Australian pygmy blue whales. Nonetheless, since the data are derived from just two individuals, these findings are preliminary in nature and cannot be extrapolated to inform a general migratory pattern from the Savu Sea to the subantarctic waters. Therefore, more satellite tags need to be deployed to southward-migrating pygmy blue whales from these Indonesian seas to confirm whether the subantarctic waters are indeed regular migratory routes of the pygmy blue whales originating from the Banda Sea in Indonesia.

Putu Liza Kusuma Mustika: Conceptualization; formal analysis; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; project administration; resources; supervision; validation; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. I Made Ratha: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; project administration; resources; validation; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Edy Setyawan: Data curation; formal analysis; methodology; resources; software; validation; visualization; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Muhammad Offal Prinanda: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; project administration; resources; writing – review and editing. Rusydi Rusydi: Investigation; methodology; writing – review and editing. Februanty Suyatiningsih Purnomo: Methodology; project administration; writing – review and editing. Imam Fauzi: Supervision; writing – review and editing.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首次记录卫星标记的侏儒蓝鲸(B. m. brevicauda)从萨武海(印度尼西亚)向南移动到亚南极水域的情况
已知侏儒蓝鲸(Balaenoptera musculus brevicauda)每年在澳大利亚南部和西部水域之间进行迁徙,经印度尼西亚的Savu海到班达海(Double et al., 2014;Möller et al., 2020)。然而,返回澳大利亚水域的旅程很少被记录下来,这往往是由于部署在澳大利亚水域的卫星标签的电池寿命有限,或者进行源自印度尼西亚水域的卫星跟踪研究的资金不足。侏儒蓝鲸亚种是已知的四个蓝鲸亚种之一(B. musculus);其他的是北方蓝鲸(b.m. musculus),南极蓝鲸(b.m. intermedia)和北印度洋蓝鲸(b.m. indica) (Branch等,2007;Leslie et al., 2020;Samaran et al., 2013)。在智利附近可能观察到第五个亚种(Branch等,2007年;Leslie et al., 2020;Samaran et al., 2013),但尚未得到官方认可。澳大利亚的侏儒蓝鲸种群已被证明在澳大利亚南部和西部水域、萨武海、帝汶海和班达海之间进行定期迁徙(Double et al., 2014;Möller等人,2020),而2016年9月和2018年11月上传的一些视频表明,班达海可能是该亚种的重要哺育地(Pindito, 2016, 2018)。在帝汶海,东帝汶南部的帝汶海槽被确定为南部冬末和南部早春期间侏儒蓝鲸可能的觅食区(Burton et al., 2023)。在2009年至2021年期间,37只侏儒蓝鲸在澳大利亚西部或南部水域被贴上了标签(Double et al., 2014;Möller等人,2020;Owen et al., 2016;Thums et al., 2022)。所有被标记的鲸鱼都向北迁移到印度尼西亚水域(Double et al., 2014;Möller et al., 2020)。大多数鲸鱼通过萨武海或帝汶海迁移到班达海,尽管没有记录有鲸鱼迁移到班达海,而是迁移到南爪哇(Möller et al., 2020)。卫星标记数据表明,向南迁移回澳大利亚水域始于2020年9月中旬(Thums et al., 2022)。然而,只有四条卫星轨迹可用于鲸鱼返回标记点的旅程:Double等人(2014)的ID98135, Möller等人(2020)的ID123229和ID123233, Thums等人(2022)的ID 182657。在这里,我们报告了在越冬区域被卫星标记的头两只澳大利亚小蓝鲸的结果:(1)在印度尼西亚和澳大利亚南部水域之间的完整迁徙,(2)从印度尼西亚向南移动到亚南极水域。2021年11月5日至19日,我们在印度尼西亚东努沙登加拉萨乌海Semau岛附近的40米船宿船Pindito上对两只侏儒蓝鲸进行了卫星标签的调查(图1)。研究小组只接近单个动物,特别避免母子对。探险队用pindto号的小艇接近鲸鱼。没有对这两头鲸进行长度测量。然而,根据鲸鱼和Zodiac船(5.5米)之间的照片比较,我们估计鲸鱼的长度为18-19米。在本研究中,我们将SPLASH10-302和SPLASH10-373卫星标签(Wildlife Computers, Redmond, WA)连接到两只侏儒蓝鲸(表1)。SPLASH10-373标签于2021年11月16日部署在鲸鱼1号上,而SPLASH10-302标签于2021年11月19日部署在萨武海洋公园的鲸鱼2号上(图1,表1)。我们对两个标签进行了编程,以收集ARGOS位置,并在每次被标记的鲸鱼来到海面时传输这些位置。以及每10分钟收集一次深度(m)和环境海水温度(°C)。我们将深度数据分为14个区域:0-5、6-20、21-50、51-100、101-200、201-300、301-400、401-500、501-600、601-700、701-800、801-1,000、1,000-1,500和&gt;1,500 m。温度数据也分为14个箱,上限为5、10、20、21、22、23、24、25、26、27、28、29、30和30°C。卫星标签收集的数据通过ARGOS卫星网络传输到野生动物计算机数据门户。具体来说,ARGOS的位置数据是不定期获得的,这取决于被贴上标签的鲸鱼在海面上停留的时间和时间。考虑到ARGOS位置数据的不规则性,我们对这些ARGOS位置数据拟合了一个状态空间模型(SSM)来估计每只被标记鲸鱼最可能的运动轨迹。SSM使用R (R Core Team, 2022)中的“aniMotum”软件包(Jonsen等人,2023)完成。我们用24小时的时间步长拟合了一个时变移动持久性模型,以每24小时生成最可能的位置。我们根据使用SSM预测的最有可能的位置,使用“move”包(Kranstauber等人,2021)计算了被标记鲸鱼的移动速度。 我们使用移动持久性指数(从0到1)来检查在跟踪期间被标记的鲸鱼的可能行为(Florko等人,2023;Jonsen et al., 2019)。对于区域限制搜索(ARS)行为(Florko et al., 2023),低移动持续指数(≤0.75)表示觅食或休息的可能性,而高移动持续指数(&gt;0.75)表示过境或旅行行为(Jonsen et al., 2019)。在被贴上标签后,两只被卫星贴上标签的侏儒蓝鲸立即从萨武海洋公园(印度尼西亚)前往澳大利亚西部水域(图2)。鲸鱼1号在西澳大利亚海岸附近巡航。最近的点记录于2021年11月27日,距离西北角北端(21.29°S, 114.09°E)约50公里。2021年12月7日,从那里开始,鲸鱼1号继续向南航行,并从奥古斯塔(西澳大利亚)向东转向,到达距离澳大利亚海岸最近的地点,距离澳大利亚南部水域30公里。2021年12月30日,在南纬39.11度,东经123.43度(西澳大利亚州埃斯佩兰斯以南约500公里),鲸鱼1号停止向东移动,开始向南和东南移动。在接下来的3.5个月里(直到2022年4月16日),鲸鱼1号穿过了37°S - 49°S和103°E - 123°E之间的水域,位于大澳大利亚湾以南,就在澳大利亚专属经济区(EEZ)之外。该区域位于副热带锋和亚南极锋之间的副热带辐合区(图2)。2022年3月13日,鲸鱼1号到达其轨迹的最西端,然后向北移动,于2022年4月16日离开副热带锋。在2022年4月29日至5月9日期间,这头鲸鱼探索了西澳大利亚鲨鱼湾水域,然后继续前往印度尼西亚水域。这头鲸最后一次出现在2022年6月1日,南纬11.84度,东经121.3度,就在它进入萨武海之前。总的来说,鲸鱼1号被跟踪了198天,总距离为13683公里,平均速度为69.1公里/天(表1)。相比之下,鲸鱼2号的旅行方向比鲸鱼1号更线性(图2)。标记后,鲸鱼2号沿着澳大利亚水域的西部边缘巡航,然后继续向西南方向航行到赫德岛和麦当劳岛。从2021年11月19日到2022年1月16日,对鲸鱼2号进行了59天的跟踪(表1)。最后一次卫星传输位于Kerguelen群岛、赫德群岛和麦当劳群岛东北500公里处,就在亚南极锋(46.5°S, 84.9°E)以北。这个位置是本研究中最西端的位置(图2)。在跟踪期间,鲸鱼#2达到了5953公里的总距离,平均速度为100.9公里/天。在198天的追踪中,1号鲸表现出了移动持续指数所显示的各种行为(图2)。1号鲸在萨乌海和西澳大利亚南部之间的轨迹上表现出了很高的移动持续指数,表明它有旅行行为。2021年12月10日,经过大约3周的旅行,鲸鱼1号开始显示区域限制搜索(ARS;Möller等人,2020)的行为表现为低移动持续指数(≤0.75;Jonsen等人,2019),这表明觅食和/或休息行为(Florko等人,2023;Möller et al., 2020)。在接下来的四个月里,直到2022年4月14日,鲸鱼1号主要表现出37°S - 49°S和103°E - 123°E之间的ARS行为,在澳大利亚专属经济区之外,在副热带锋和亚南极锋之间。在返回印度尼西亚的途中,鲸鱼1号普遍表现出高移动持久性指数的旅行行为。这头鲸在鲨鱼湾和埃克斯茅斯北部地区展示了ARS行为。与鲸鱼1号相反,鲸鱼2号始终表现出高移动持续性指数(&gt;0.75;Jonsen et al., 2019)持续59天,直到2022年1月16日标签停止传输。1号鲸鱼在0-50米的深度中花费了超过85%的时间(图3a),而2号鲸鱼在0-20米的深度中花费了近75%的时间(图3b)。这两种鲸鱼在51-100米的深度中花费了大约10%的时间,在101-200米的深度中花费了高达3%的时间(图3a)。鲸鱼# 1的最大潜水深度是456±4 m,发生在2021年12月21日为38.13°,120.99°E,西澳大利亚南部420公里,而鲸鱼的最大记录潜水深度# 2是312±4 m,发生在12月17日,2021年为31.78°S, 102.19°E,近1300公里以西的西澳大利亚(表1).Despite不完整的数据传输,我们能够检查93 198跟踪33天,跟踪59天的潜水行为鲸鱼鲸鱼# 1和# 2,分别。在跟踪期间,鲸鱼1号的每日潜水深度有所变化。 在跟踪期间的前几天,1号鲸主要潜入0-20米的深度(图4a)。从2021年12月中旬到12月底,这条鲸鱼经常潜入西澳大利亚以南200米深处,在澳大利亚的专属经济区和亚热带锋之间。从2022年1月初到2022年2月初,在亚热带锋周围,鲸鱼更频繁地潜入50米到100米之间。当鲸鱼向西南移动到亚南极锋附近地区时,鲸鱼更频繁地潜入较浅的水域(21-50米)。与鲸鱼1号一样,鲸鱼2号在2021年11月至2022年1月中旬期间主要潜入0-20米深的较浅深度(图4b)。2021年12月中旬,在到达南纬30度后,鲸鱼2号开始更频繁地下潜200米以上。经过13600公里的旅行,1号鲸的传播在萨武海以南的水域结束,六个月前它在那里被贴上了标签。据我们所知,这段旅程将是蓝鲸第二长的迁徙旅程,仅次于南澳大利亚水域的蓝鲸,271天的旅程为15,120公里(Möller et al., 2020)。2号鲸的浅潜和高平均速度表明,当卫星传输停止时,它还没有到达夏季地面的目的地(表1)。2号鲸的轨迹支持了澳大利亚侏儒蓝鲸种群的栖息地可能包括Kerguelen高原的假设(Samaran et al., 2010, 2013),但由于样本大小为1,因此不确定。两只侏儒蓝鲸的水平运动与历史上的蓝鲸捕鲸点(图5)和另外两种大型鲸鱼的卫星轨迹重叠。1号鲸的足迹与在澳大利亚和新西兰越冬地标记的南露脊鲸(Eubalaena australis)的卫星足迹重叠(Mackay等人,2020),而2号鲸的足迹与在西澳大利亚水域标记的座头鲸(Megaptera novaeangliae)的足迹重叠(Bestley等人,2019)。这项研究表明,澳大利亚侏儒蓝鲸的栖息地范围扩大了。然而,由于数据仅来自两个人,这些发现本质上是初步的,不能推断出从萨武海到亚南极水域的一般迁徙模式。因此,需要对这些印度尼西亚海域向南迁徙的侏儒蓝鲸部署更多的卫星标签,以确认亚南极水域是否确实是来自印度尼西亚班达海的侏儒蓝鲸的常规迁徙路线。Putu Liza Kusuma Mustika:概念化;正式的分析;资金收购;调查;方法;项目管理;资源;监督;验证;写作——原稿;写作——审阅和编辑。I Made Ratha:概念化;数据管理;正式的分析;资金收购;调查;方法;项目管理;资源;验证;写作——原稿;写作——审阅和编辑。Edy Setyawan:数据管理;正式的分析;方法;资源;软件;验证;可视化;写作——原稿;写作——审阅和编辑。Muhammad Offal Prinanda:概念化;数据管理;正式的分析;资金收购;调查;方法;项目管理;资源;写作——审阅和编辑。Rusydi:调查;方法;写作——审阅和编辑。2月份的研究:方法论;项目管理;写作——审阅和编辑。Imam Fauzi:监督;写作——审阅和编辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Mammal Science
Marine Mammal Science 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published for the Society for Marine Mammalogy, Marine Mammal Science is a source of significant new findings on marine mammals resulting from original research on their form and function, evolution, systematics, physiology, biochemistry, behavior, population biology, life history, genetics, ecology and conservation. The journal features both original and review articles, notes, opinions and letters. It serves as a vital resource for anyone studying marine mammals.
期刊最新文献
Applying the Ecological Trap Concept to Cetaceans Predicting Individual Body Length, Volume, and Mass From Dominant Stroke Cycle Frequency in Sperm Whales: Empirical Cross-Validation and Prediction Functions Predicting Individual Body Length, Volume, and Mass From Dominant Stroke Cycle Frequency in Sperm Whales: Empirical Cross-Validation and Prediction Functions Stock Identity of Stranded Tamanend's Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops erebennus) With Evidence of Fisheries Interaction in Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, 1996–2019 Stock Identity of Stranded Tamanend's Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops erebennus) With Evidence of Fisheries Interaction in Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, 1996–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1