Application of machine learning for predicting G9a inhibitors

IF 6.2 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Digital discovery Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1039/d4dd00101j
Mariya L. Ivanova, Nicola Russo, Nadia Djaid, Konstantin Nikolic
{"title":"Application of machine learning for predicting G9a inhibitors","authors":"Mariya L. Ivanova, Nicola Russo, Nadia Djaid, Konstantin Nikolic","doi":"10.1039/d4dd00101j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<em>Object and significance</em>: the G9a enzyme is an epigenomic regulator, making gene expression directly dependent on how various substances in the cell affect this enzyme. Therefore, it is crucial to consider this impact in any biochemical research involving the development of new compounds introduced into the body. While this can be examined experimentally, it would be highly advantageous to predict these effects using computer simulations. <em>Purpose</em>: the purpose of the model was to assist in answering the question of the potential effect that a compound under development could have on the G9a activity, and thus reduce the need for laboratory experiments and facilitate faster and more productive research and development. <em>Solution</em>: the paper proposes a cost-effective machine learning model that determines whether a compound is an active G9a inhibitor. The proposed approach utilises the already existing very extensive PubChem database. The starting point was the quantitative high-throughput screening assay for inhibitors of histone lysine methyltransferase G9a (also available on PubChem) which screened around 350 000 compounds. For these compounds, datasets of 60 features were created. Then different ML algorithms were deployed to find the best performing one, which can then be used to predict if some untested compound would actively inhibit G9a. <em>Results</em>: six different ML classifiers have been implemented on five dataset variations. Different variants of the dataset were created by using two different data balancing approaches and including or not the influence of water solubility at a pH of 7.4. The most successful combination was a dataset with five features and a random forest classifier that reached 90% accuracy. The classifier was trained with 60 244 and tested with 15 062 compounds. Feature reduction was obtained by analysing three different feature importance algorithms, which resulted in not only feature reduction but also some insights for further biochemical research.","PeriodicalId":72816,"journal":{"name":"Digital discovery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4dd00101j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Object and significance: the G9a enzyme is an epigenomic regulator, making gene expression directly dependent on how various substances in the cell affect this enzyme. Therefore, it is crucial to consider this impact in any biochemical research involving the development of new compounds introduced into the body. While this can be examined experimentally, it would be highly advantageous to predict these effects using computer simulations. Purpose: the purpose of the model was to assist in answering the question of the potential effect that a compound under development could have on the G9a activity, and thus reduce the need for laboratory experiments and facilitate faster and more productive research and development. Solution: the paper proposes a cost-effective machine learning model that determines whether a compound is an active G9a inhibitor. The proposed approach utilises the already existing very extensive PubChem database. The starting point was the quantitative high-throughput screening assay for inhibitors of histone lysine methyltransferase G9a (also available on PubChem) which screened around 350 000 compounds. For these compounds, datasets of 60 features were created. Then different ML algorithms were deployed to find the best performing one, which can then be used to predict if some untested compound would actively inhibit G9a. Results: six different ML classifiers have been implemented on five dataset variations. Different variants of the dataset were created by using two different data balancing approaches and including or not the influence of water solubility at a pH of 7.4. The most successful combination was a dataset with five features and a random forest classifier that reached 90% accuracy. The classifier was trained with 60 244 and tested with 15 062 compounds. Feature reduction was obtained by analysing three different feature importance algorithms, which resulted in not only feature reduction but also some insights for further biochemical research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用机器学习预测 G9a 抑制剂
目的和意义:G9a 酶是一种表观基因组调控因子,使基因表达直接取决于细胞中各种物质对该酶的影响。因此,在任何涉及开发引入体内的新化合物的生化研究中,考虑这种影响至关重要。虽然这可以通过实验来检验,但利用计算机模拟来预测这些影响是非常有利的。目的:该模型的目的是帮助回答正在开发的化合物可能对 G9a 活性产生的潜在影响,从而减少对实验室实验的需求,促进更快、更有成效的研究和开发。解决方案:本文提出了一种具有成本效益的机器学习模型,用于确定化合物是否是一种活性 G9a 抑制剂。所提出的方法利用了现有的非常广泛的 PubChem 数据库。起点是组蛋白赖氨酸甲基转移酶 G9a 抑制剂的定量高通量筛选测定(也可在 PubChem 上查阅),该测定筛选了约 350,000 种化合物。针对这些化合物,我们创建了包含 60 个特征的数据集。然后采用不同的 ML 算法,找出性能最好的算法,然后用它来预测某些未经测试的化合物是否会对 G9a 产生积极的抑制作用。结果:在五个数据集变体上实现了六种不同的 ML 分类器。通过使用两种不同的数据平衡方法,并考虑或不考虑 pH 值为 7.4 时水溶性的影响,创建了数据集的不同变体。最成功的组合是具有五个特征的数据集和随机森林分类器,准确率达到 90%。分类器用 60 244 种化合物进行了训练,并用 15 062 种化合物进行了测试。通过分析三种不同的特征重要性算法,不仅减少了特征,还为进一步的生化研究提供了一些启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge Graph Representation of Zeolitic Crystalline Materials Physics-based reward driven image analysis in microscopy Back cover A Machine Learning Approach for the Prediction of Aqueous Solubility of Pharmaceuticals: A Comparative Model and Dataset Analysis Outstanding Reviewers for Digital Discovery in 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1