Harm Reduction in Peer-Assisted Telemedicine for Hepatitis C: Secondary Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Viruses Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.3390/v16091455
Hunter Spencer, Devin Gregoire, Gillian Leichtling, Megan Herink, Andrew Seaman, P. Todd Korthuis, Ryan Cook
{"title":"Harm Reduction in Peer-Assisted Telemedicine for Hepatitis C: Secondary Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Hunter Spencer, Devin Gregoire, Gillian Leichtling, Megan Herink, Andrew Seaman, P. Todd Korthuis, Ryan Cook","doi":"10.3390/v16091455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hepatitis C (HCV) treatment for people who use drugs (PWUD) decreases injection drug use and injection equipment sharing. We examined changes in injection drug use and injection equipment sharing following HCV treatment in a randomized trial comparing peer-assisted telemedicine for HCV treatment (TeleHCV) versus peer-assisted usual care in rural PWUD. We hypothesize that TeleHCV reduces risky behaviors and peers facilitate this change. We used mixed-effects logistic regression to describe participant-level (n = 203) associations between both injection drug use and injection equipment sharing and randomized groups, frequency of peer contact, HCV treatment initiation, HCV cure, and time. Risky behaviors were surveyed at baseline and 12 and 36 weeks after HCV treatment completion. Injection drug use declined more over time in TeleHCV participants vs. control at 12 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.42, 95% CI 0.20–0.87, p = 0.02) and 36 weeks (aOR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.21–1.08, p = 0.076). Injection drug use decreased more with a greater number of peer interactions, with reductions among participants in the 3rd quartile exceeding those in the 1st quartile of peer interactions at 12 weeks (aOR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.57–0.99, p = 0.04). Similarly, injection equipment sharing decreased over time, with reductions among participants in the 3rd quartile exceeding those in the 1st quartile of peer interactions at 36 weeks (aOR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.01–0.97, p = 0.047). Peer-assisted telemedicine for HCV treatment decreases injection drug use and injection equipment sharing; peers contribute to this effect.","PeriodicalId":501326,"journal":{"name":"Viruses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viruses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/v16091455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hepatitis C (HCV) treatment for people who use drugs (PWUD) decreases injection drug use and injection equipment sharing. We examined changes in injection drug use and injection equipment sharing following HCV treatment in a randomized trial comparing peer-assisted telemedicine for HCV treatment (TeleHCV) versus peer-assisted usual care in rural PWUD. We hypothesize that TeleHCV reduces risky behaviors and peers facilitate this change. We used mixed-effects logistic regression to describe participant-level (n = 203) associations between both injection drug use and injection equipment sharing and randomized groups, frequency of peer contact, HCV treatment initiation, HCV cure, and time. Risky behaviors were surveyed at baseline and 12 and 36 weeks after HCV treatment completion. Injection drug use declined more over time in TeleHCV participants vs. control at 12 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.42, 95% CI 0.20–0.87, p = 0.02) and 36 weeks (aOR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.21–1.08, p = 0.076). Injection drug use decreased more with a greater number of peer interactions, with reductions among participants in the 3rd quartile exceeding those in the 1st quartile of peer interactions at 12 weeks (aOR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.57–0.99, p = 0.04). Similarly, injection equipment sharing decreased over time, with reductions among participants in the 3rd quartile exceeding those in the 1st quartile of peer interactions at 36 weeks (aOR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.01–0.97, p = 0.047). Peer-assisted telemedicine for HCV treatment decreases injection drug use and injection equipment sharing; peers contribute to this effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同伴互助远程医疗治疗丙型肝炎的减低伤害效果:随机对照试验的次要结果
对吸毒者(PWUD)进行丙型肝炎(HCV)治疗可减少注射吸毒和注射设备共用。在一项随机试验中,我们比较了在农村吸毒者中采用同伴辅助远程医疗进行丙型肝炎病毒治疗(TeleHCV)和同伴辅助常规护理进行丙型肝炎病毒治疗后注射吸毒和共用注射器具的变化。我们假设 TeleHCV 会减少危险行为,而同伴会促进这种改变。我们采用混合效应逻辑回归法来描述参与者(n = 203)注射吸毒和注射器共用与随机分组、同伴接触频率、HCV 治疗启动、HCV 治愈和时间之间的关联。在基线以及完成 HCV 治疗 12 周和 36 周后,对危险行为进行了调查。随着时间的推移,TeleHCV 参与者与对照组相比,在 12 周(调整赔率 [aOR] = 0.42,95% CI 0.20-0.87,p = 0.02)和 36 周(aOR = 0.48,95% CI 0.21-1.08,p = 0.076)时,注射吸毒的减少幅度更大。同伴互动次数越多,注射毒品的使用率下降越多,在 12 周时,同伴互动次数处于第三四分位数的参与者的使用率下降幅度超过同伴互动次数处于第一四分位数的参与者(aOR = 0.75,95% CI 0.57-0.99,p = 0.04)。同样,随着时间的推移,注射器共用的情况也在减少,在 36 周时,第 3 个四分位数参与者共用注射器的情况超过了第 1 个四分位数参与者共用注射器的情况(aOR = 0.08,95% CI 0.01-0.97,p = 0.047)。同伴辅助远程医疗治疗丙型肝炎病毒可减少注射吸毒和注射设备共用;同伴有助于产生这种效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sputnik V-Induced Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Variants during the Dissemination of the Gamma Variant in Venezuela Immunogenicity of an Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine in People Living with HIV in Guangxi, China: A Prospective Cohort Study The Autonomous Fusion Activity of Human Cytomegalovirus Glycoprotein B Is Regulated by Its Carboxy-Terminal Domain Mycologists and Virologists Align: Proposing Botrytis cinerea for Global Mycovirus Studies New Therapies and Strategies to Curb HIV Infections with a Focus on Macrophages and Reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1