A Multi-Center Study on the Implementation and Challenges of Nursing Three-Level Ward Rounds in Tertiary Hospitals in Shanxi Province

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.2147/jmdh.s474702
Ying Shao, Qianfei Li, Meirong Bian, Yue Wang, Xiaohong Zhang
{"title":"A Multi-Center Study on the Implementation and Challenges of Nursing Three-Level Ward Rounds in Tertiary Hospitals in Shanxi Province","authors":"Ying Shao, Qianfei Li, Meirong Bian, Yue Wang, Xiaohong Zhang","doi":"10.2147/jmdh.s474702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> The “Key Points of the Core System of Medical Quality and Safety” (hereinafter referred to as the “Key Points”) was promulgated by the National Health Commission of China in 2018, requiring that nursing ward rounds should be carried out with reference to the three-level ward round system; In 2020 and 2022 editions of the “Evaluation Standards for Tertiary Hospitals”, which were implemented in China, required that nursing ward rounds should be carried out with reference to the “Key Points”. Additionally, the Action Plan for Comprehensively Improving Medical Quality (2023– 2025) also mentions the need to improve the quality of three-level ward rounds. However, there are no detailed guidelines regarding implementing “Nursing Three-level Ward Rounds”.<br/><strong>Purpose:</strong> This study aimed to investigate the current situation of nursing three-level ward rounds in tertiary hospitals after the promulgation of the “Key Points of the Core System of Medical Quality and Safety” to provide insights and guidelines regarding relevant standards, so as to better implement of the requirements of “nursing ward rounds” in the “Evaluation Standards for Tertiary Hospitals” and “improving the quality of three-level ward rounds” in the “Action Plan”.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> A multi-center study was conducted in February 2024, including all tertiary public hospitals in the Shanxi Province, China. A questionnaire survey using the self-designed “<u>Questionnaire on the Implementation of Nursing Three-level Ward Rounds</u>” was carried out. The questionnaire included the basic information of the hospital and the implementation of the three-level (namely I, II, and III) rounds (including “five aspects”: ward round personnel, object, content, frequency, and record), which is expressed by quantity and composition ratio. Next is the text analysis method. First, the “five aspects” of the hospital that filled in the questionnaire survey with “nursing three-level ward rounds have been carried out” were assessed. Second, the five aspects of each hospital were assessed for consistency with the “Nursing Three-level Ward Rounds System” (hereinafter referred to as the “System”) of their respective hospitals.Third, the consistency of the “System” of the hospital with the “Key Points” was assessed. The results of the analysis of the former are expressed in terms of quantity and composition ratio; the results of the latter two were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test method to compare any differences.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Notably, 14 of the 67 tertiary public hospitals (20.9%) carried out nursing three-level ward rounds. There were 4– 10 situations in the five aspects of I, II, and III ward rounds filled in by the hospitals. The five aspects of the I, II, III ward rounds in 14 hospitals were significantly comparable with the “System”, which, in turn, was comparable with the “Key Points” (P &lt; 0.05).<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Not all tertiary public hospitals in the Shanxi Province have not all carried out nursing three-level ward rounds. Furthermore, the five aspects of the hospitals that carried out nursing three-level ward rounds were not entirely consistent in terms of ward round personnel, object, content, frequency, and record. The filling in of the nursing three-level ward rounds carried out by the hospitals is inconsistent with the respective “System”; the “System” of the hospital is not in line with the “Key Points”.<br/><strong>Impact on Nursing Work:</strong> Nursing administrators should be aware of the newly issued norms and requirements in their workplace, and revise the relevant systems in accordance with the norms and requirements in a timely manner. Additionally, the revision of the system should cover the core requirements of the norms and be practicable. The system should be supervised to ensure that 100% of the implementation is in accordance with the system.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s474702","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The “Key Points of the Core System of Medical Quality and Safety” (hereinafter referred to as the “Key Points”) was promulgated by the National Health Commission of China in 2018, requiring that nursing ward rounds should be carried out with reference to the three-level ward round system; In 2020 and 2022 editions of the “Evaluation Standards for Tertiary Hospitals”, which were implemented in China, required that nursing ward rounds should be carried out with reference to the “Key Points”. Additionally, the Action Plan for Comprehensively Improving Medical Quality (2023– 2025) also mentions the need to improve the quality of three-level ward rounds. However, there are no detailed guidelines regarding implementing “Nursing Three-level Ward Rounds”.
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the current situation of nursing three-level ward rounds in tertiary hospitals after the promulgation of the “Key Points of the Core System of Medical Quality and Safety” to provide insights and guidelines regarding relevant standards, so as to better implement of the requirements of “nursing ward rounds” in the “Evaluation Standards for Tertiary Hospitals” and “improving the quality of three-level ward rounds” in the “Action Plan”.
Methods: A multi-center study was conducted in February 2024, including all tertiary public hospitals in the Shanxi Province, China. A questionnaire survey using the self-designed “Questionnaire on the Implementation of Nursing Three-level Ward Rounds” was carried out. The questionnaire included the basic information of the hospital and the implementation of the three-level (namely I, II, and III) rounds (including “five aspects”: ward round personnel, object, content, frequency, and record), which is expressed by quantity and composition ratio. Next is the text analysis method. First, the “five aspects” of the hospital that filled in the questionnaire survey with “nursing three-level ward rounds have been carried out” were assessed. Second, the five aspects of each hospital were assessed for consistency with the “Nursing Three-level Ward Rounds System” (hereinafter referred to as the “System”) of their respective hospitals.Third, the consistency of the “System” of the hospital with the “Key Points” was assessed. The results of the analysis of the former are expressed in terms of quantity and composition ratio; the results of the latter two were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test method to compare any differences.
Results: Notably, 14 of the 67 tertiary public hospitals (20.9%) carried out nursing three-level ward rounds. There were 4– 10 situations in the five aspects of I, II, and III ward rounds filled in by the hospitals. The five aspects of the I, II, III ward rounds in 14 hospitals were significantly comparable with the “System”, which, in turn, was comparable with the “Key Points” (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Not all tertiary public hospitals in the Shanxi Province have not all carried out nursing three-level ward rounds. Furthermore, the five aspects of the hospitals that carried out nursing three-level ward rounds were not entirely consistent in terms of ward round personnel, object, content, frequency, and record. The filling in of the nursing three-level ward rounds carried out by the hospitals is inconsistent with the respective “System”; the “System” of the hospital is not in line with the “Key Points”.
Impact on Nursing Work: Nursing administrators should be aware of the newly issued norms and requirements in their workplace, and revise the relevant systems in accordance with the norms and requirements in a timely manner. Additionally, the revision of the system should cover the core requirements of the norms and be practicable. The system should be supervised to ensure that 100% of the implementation is in accordance with the system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
山西省三级医院护理三级查房的实施与挑战的多中心研究
背景介绍2018年,国家卫健委颁布《医疗质量安全核心制度要点》(以下简称《要点》),要求护理查房参照三级查房制度执行;2020年和2022年我国实施的《三级医院评审标准》中,要求护理查房参照《要点》执行。此外,《全面提高医疗质量行动计划(2023-2025 年)》也提到要提高三级查房质量。目的:本研究旨在调查《医疗质量与安全核心制度要点》颁布后,三级医院护理三级查房的现状,为相关标准提供见解和指导,以更好地落实《三级医院评价标准》中 "护理查房 "和《行动计划》中 "提高三级查房质量 "的要求:于 2024 年 2 月开展了一项多中心研究,研究对象包括山西省所有三级公立医院。采用自行设计的《护理三级查房实施情况调查问卷》进行问卷调查。问卷内容包括医院基本情况和三级(即Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ级)查房实施情况(包括查房人员、对象、内容、频次、记录 "五个方面"),以数量和构成比表示。其次是文本分析法。首先,对问卷调查中填写 "已开展护理三级查房 "的医院的 "五个方面 "进行评估。其次,评估各医院 "五个方面 "与本医院 "护理三级查房制度"(以下简称 "制度")的一致性;第三,评估本医院 "制度 "与 "要点 "的一致性。前者的分析结果用数量和构成比表示;后两者的分析结果用费雪精确检验法比较差异:值得注意的是,67 家三级公立医院中有 14 家(20.9%)开展了护理三级查房。在各医院填写的 I、II、III 级查房的五个方面中,有 4- 10 种情况。14家医院的I、II、III级查房的五个方面与 "制度 "具有显著可比性,而 "制度 "又与 "要点 "具有可比性(P< 0.05):山西省三级公立医院并非全部开展了护理三级查房。此外,开展护理三级查房的医院在查房人员、查房对象、查房内容、查房频次、查房记录五个方面并不完全一致。各医院开展的护理三级查房的填写与各自的《制度》不一致;医院的《制度》与《要点》不一致。对护理工作的影响:护理管理者应了解新颁布的工作规范和要求,及时按照规范和要求修订相关制度。此外,制度的修订应涵盖规范的核心要求,并切实可行。应监督制度的执行情况,确保 100%按照制度执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
期刊最新文献
Integrated Community-Based Care for Dependent Older People Community Participation in Preparation for Recurrent Outbreaks of COVID-19. A Review of the Application of Myofascial Release Therapy in the Treatment of Diseases. Construction and Evaluation of a Predictive Model for Grassroots Nurses’ Risk Perception of “Internet + Nursing Services”: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study Community Pharmacists’ Readiness for Breast Cancer Mammogram Promotion: A National Survey from Jordan Adolescent Patients’Experiences of Mental Disorders Related to School Bullying [Letter]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1