Enhancing privacy protections in national identification systems: an examination of stakeholders’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices of privacy by design

IF 2.4 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Information Security Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1007/s10207-024-00905-0
Mohamed Abomhara, Livinus Obiora Nweke, Sule Yildirim Yayilgan, Debora Comparin, Kristel Teyras, Stéphanie de Labriolle
{"title":"Enhancing privacy protections in national identification systems: an examination of stakeholders’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices of privacy by design","authors":"Mohamed Abomhara, Livinus Obiora Nweke, Sule Yildirim Yayilgan, Debora Comparin, Kristel Teyras, Stéphanie de Labriolle","doi":"10.1007/s10207-024-00905-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Privacy by Design (PbD) is a well-known concept that aims to provide a high level of protection for privacy throughout the entire life cycle of systems development. Despite the considerable attention from stakeholders such as researchers, government agencies, and system suppliers, the widespread adoption of PbD faces obstacles due to a lack of knowledge, insufficient awareness of PbD benefits, and the absence of specific implementation guidelines. In this study, stakeholders are identified primarily as diverse participants from government agencies and system suppliers engaged in National Identification Systems (NIDS). Specifically, government agencies representing regulatory bodies and administrators of NIDS, setting the legal framework that governs the NIDS’s privacy aspects. The NIDS system suppliers includes private companies playing a crucial role in the development and implementation of NIDS with a focus on privacy considerations. Through the perspectives of NIDS stakeholders, this study aimed to examine the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) of PbD principles and its integration in NIDS. A survey involving 203 participants from government agencies and NIDS system suppliers engaged in NIDS development was conducted. Subsequently, a focus group discussion was held with 11 members to provide qualitative insights into the KAP of PbD. The survey results revealed a significant correlation between attitudes and practices but a weak correlation between knowledge and attitudes or practices. The focus group discussion assured these findings, emphasizing the role of positive attitudes in facilitating PbD practices and highlighting knowledge-practice gaps. In conclusion, this study offers tailored recommendations for improving the integration of PbD in NIDS development. The recommendations includes strategies such as developing training programs, establishing clear guidelines and standards and creating awareness campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":50316,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Security","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-024-00905-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Privacy by Design (PbD) is a well-known concept that aims to provide a high level of protection for privacy throughout the entire life cycle of systems development. Despite the considerable attention from stakeholders such as researchers, government agencies, and system suppliers, the widespread adoption of PbD faces obstacles due to a lack of knowledge, insufficient awareness of PbD benefits, and the absence of specific implementation guidelines. In this study, stakeholders are identified primarily as diverse participants from government agencies and system suppliers engaged in National Identification Systems (NIDS). Specifically, government agencies representing regulatory bodies and administrators of NIDS, setting the legal framework that governs the NIDS’s privacy aspects. The NIDS system suppliers includes private companies playing a crucial role in the development and implementation of NIDS with a focus on privacy considerations. Through the perspectives of NIDS stakeholders, this study aimed to examine the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) of PbD principles and its integration in NIDS. A survey involving 203 participants from government agencies and NIDS system suppliers engaged in NIDS development was conducted. Subsequently, a focus group discussion was held with 11 members to provide qualitative insights into the KAP of PbD. The survey results revealed a significant correlation between attitudes and practices but a weak correlation between knowledge and attitudes or practices. The focus group discussion assured these findings, emphasizing the role of positive attitudes in facilitating PbD practices and highlighting knowledge-practice gaps. In conclusion, this study offers tailored recommendations for improving the integration of PbD in NIDS development. The recommendations includes strategies such as developing training programs, establishing clear guidelines and standards and creating awareness campaigns.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强国家身份识别系统中的隐私保护:审查利益相关者对隐私设计的认识、态度和做法
隐私保护设计(PbD)是一个众所周知的概念,其目的是在系统开发的整个生命周期中提供高水平的隐私保护。尽管受到了研究人员、政府机构和系统供应商等利益相关者的广泛关注,但由于缺乏相关知识、对 PbD 的益处认识不足以及缺乏具体的实施指南,PbD 的广泛采用仍面临重重障碍。在本研究中,利益相关者主要是指从事国家身份识别系统(NIDS)的政府机构和系统供应商的不同参与者。具体来说,政府机构代表国家身份识别系统的监管机构和管理者,制定管理国家身份识别系统隐私方面的法律框架。国家身份识别系统供应商包括在开发和实施国家身份识别系统中发挥关键作用的私营公司,其重点是隐私方面的考虑。本研究旨在通过 NIDS 利益相关者的视角,考察他们对 PbD 原则的认识、态度和做法 (KAP),以及将其纳入 NIDS 的情况。本研究进行了一项调查,有 203 名来自政府机构和参与 NIDS 开发的 NIDS 系统供应商的人员参加。随后,与 11 名成员进行了焦点小组讨论,以提供有关 PbD 的 KAP 的定性见解。调查结果显示,态度与实践之间存在明显的相关性,但知识与态度或实践之间的相关性较弱。焦点小组讨论证实了这些结果,强调了积极态度在促进实践中的作用,并突出了知识与实践之间的差距。总之,本研究提出了有针对性的建议,以更好地将项目促发展纳入国家艾滋病规划署的发展。这些建议包括制定培训计划、建立明确的指导方针和标准以及开展宣传活动等战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Security
International Journal of Information Security 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Security is an English language periodical on research in information security which offers prompt publication of important technical work, whether theoretical, applicable, or related to implementation. Coverage includes system security: intrusion detection, secure end systems, secure operating systems, database security, security infrastructures, security evaluation; network security: Internet security, firewalls, mobile security, security agents, protocols, anti-virus and anti-hacker measures; content protection: watermarking, software protection, tamper resistant software; applications: electronic commerce, government, health, telecommunications, mobility.
期刊最新文献
“Animation” URL in NFT marketplaces considered harmful for privacy An overview of proposals towards the privacy-preserving publication of trajectory data Enhancing privacy protections in national identification systems: an examination of stakeholders’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices of privacy by design An enhanced and verifiable lightweight authentication protocol for securing the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) based on CP-ABE encryption Secure multi-party computation with legally-enforceable fairness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1