Manuela Di Biase,Babette van der Zwaard,Fenne Aarts,Barbe Pieters
{"title":"Pre-operative triAge proCedure to streaMline elective surgicAl patieNts (PACMAN) improves efficiency by selecting patients eligible for phone consultation: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Manuela Di Biase,Babette van der Zwaard,Fenne Aarts,Barbe Pieters","doi":"10.1097/eja.0000000000002055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPre-operative screening is a high volume task consuming time and resource. Streamlining patient flow by gathering information in advance reduces costs, optimises resources and diminishes patient burden whilst maintaining safety of care.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo evaluate whether 'Pre-operative triAge proCedure to streaMline elective surgicAl patieNts' (PACMAN) is able to improve pre-operative screening by selecting patients eligible for evaluation by telephone.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort analysis.\r\n\r\nSETTING\r\nA tertiary medical teaching hospital in 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.\r\n\r\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\r\nAdults scheduled for clinical interventions under procedural sedation and all types of elective medium or low risk surgery with anaesthetic guidance were eligible. Patients answered a questionnaire to calculate the PACMAN score. This score combined with risk factors related to surgery determines suitability for phone consultation (PhC) or the need for an in-person consultation (in-PC).\r\n\r\nINTERVENTION\r\nEvaluation of standard care.\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\r\nPrimary outcome was the reduction in number of in-PCs. Secondary outcomes included reliability of PACMAN, peri-operative patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 965 patients triaged by PACMAN, 705 (73.1%) were identified as suitable for a PhC. Of those, 688 (97.6%) were classified American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) I to II or III with stable comorbidities. Of the 260 in-PC patients, 47.4% were classified ASA-PS III with unstable comorbidities or ASA-PS IV. The overall incidence of unanticipated adverse peri-operative events was 1.3%. Finally, implementation of PACMAN led to a 20% increase in pre-operative department efficiency due to better deployment of personnel and resources.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nImplementation of PACMAN resulted in a 73.1% reduction in pre-operative in-PCs at our hospital. Given the increasing pressure on healthcare systems globally, we suggest developing further optimisation and integration of smart triage solutions into the pre-operative process.\r\n\r\nTRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06148701.","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000002055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Pre-operative screening is a high volume task consuming time and resource. Streamlining patient flow by gathering information in advance reduces costs, optimises resources and diminishes patient burden whilst maintaining safety of care.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether 'Pre-operative triAge proCedure to streaMline elective surgicAl patieNts' (PACMAN) is able to improve pre-operative screening by selecting patients eligible for evaluation by telephone.
DESIGN
A single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort analysis.
SETTING
A tertiary medical teaching hospital in 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Adults scheduled for clinical interventions under procedural sedation and all types of elective medium or low risk surgery with anaesthetic guidance were eligible. Patients answered a questionnaire to calculate the PACMAN score. This score combined with risk factors related to surgery determines suitability for phone consultation (PhC) or the need for an in-person consultation (in-PC).
INTERVENTION
Evaluation of standard care.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Primary outcome was the reduction in number of in-PCs. Secondary outcomes included reliability of PACMAN, peri-operative patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
RESULTS
Of 965 patients triaged by PACMAN, 705 (73.1%) were identified as suitable for a PhC. Of those, 688 (97.6%) were classified American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) I to II or III with stable comorbidities. Of the 260 in-PC patients, 47.4% were classified ASA-PS III with unstable comorbidities or ASA-PS IV. The overall incidence of unanticipated adverse peri-operative events was 1.3%. Finally, implementation of PACMAN led to a 20% increase in pre-operative department efficiency due to better deployment of personnel and resources.
CONCLUSION
Implementation of PACMAN resulted in a 73.1% reduction in pre-operative in-PCs at our hospital. Given the increasing pressure on healthcare systems globally, we suggest developing further optimisation and integration of smart triage solutions into the pre-operative process.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06148701.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).