Co-administration of dexmedetomidine with total intravenous anaesthesia in carotid endarterectomy reduces requirements for propofol and improves haemodynamic stability: A single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002099
Christian Vetter, Eva R Meyer, Kathleen Seidel, David Bervini, Markus Huber, Vladimir Krejci
{"title":"Co-administration of dexmedetomidine with total intravenous anaesthesia in carotid endarterectomy reduces requirements for propofol and improves haemodynamic stability: A single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Christian Vetter, Eva R Meyer, Kathleen Seidel, David Bervini, Markus Huber, Vladimir Krejci","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total intravenous anaesthesia guided by electroencephalography and neurophysiological monitoring may be used for carotid endarterectomy. Reduction of brain metabolic demand during cross-clamping of the internal carotid artery with propofol titrated to burst suppression requires effect-site concentrations that may delay emergence and interfere with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the hypothesis that dexmedetomidine decreases the effect-site concentration of propofol required for burst-suppression in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University Hospital of Berne, Switzerland, from October 2018 to September 2024.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomised into a control (n = 23) and a dexmedetomidine groups (n = 22). Total intravenous anaesthesia was administered to both groups. Patients in the dexmedetomidine group received an intravenous bolus of dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg kg-1 over 10 min) before induction, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion (0.4 μg kg-1 h-1). The effect-site concentrations of propofol were titrated against frontal electroencephalography parameters. Burst suppression was induced with propofol during cross-clamping of the internal carotid artery.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the effect-site concentration of propofol required for burst-suppression. The secondary outcomes were the requirement for vasoactive substances, neurophysiological monitoring parameters, and postoperative delirium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effect-site concentration of propofol required for burst suppression was 4.0 μg ml-1 [3.50 to 4.90] (median [interquartile range]) in the dexmedetomidine group compared with 6.0 μg ml-1 [5.5 to 7.3] in the control group (P < 0.001). Less norepinephrine was required in the dexmedetomidine group (total 454 μg [246 to 818] compared with 1000 μg [444 to 1326] (P = 0.015) in the control group). Dexmedetomidine did not affect intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Co-administration of dexmedetomidine to total intravenous anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy decreased the effect-site concentrations of propofol required for burst suppression by 33%. The propofol-sparing effect and peripheral alpha-agonism of dexmedetomidine may explain the reduced requirement for vasopressors.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04662177.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total intravenous anaesthesia guided by electroencephalography and neurophysiological monitoring may be used for carotid endarterectomy. Reduction of brain metabolic demand during cross-clamping of the internal carotid artery with propofol titrated to burst suppression requires effect-site concentrations that may delay emergence and interfere with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Objective: To test the hypothesis that dexmedetomidine decreases the effect-site concentration of propofol required for burst-suppression in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Participants: Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

Setting: University Hospital of Berne, Switzerland, from October 2018 to September 2024.

Interventions: Patients were randomised into a control (n = 23) and a dexmedetomidine groups (n = 22). Total intravenous anaesthesia was administered to both groups. Patients in the dexmedetomidine group received an intravenous bolus of dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg kg-1 over 10 min) before induction, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion (0.4 μg kg-1 h-1). The effect-site concentrations of propofol were titrated against frontal electroencephalography parameters. Burst suppression was induced with propofol during cross-clamping of the internal carotid artery.

Outcome measures: The primary outcome was the effect-site concentration of propofol required for burst-suppression. The secondary outcomes were the requirement for vasoactive substances, neurophysiological monitoring parameters, and postoperative delirium.

Results: The effect-site concentration of propofol required for burst suppression was 4.0 μg ml-1 [3.50 to 4.90] (median [interquartile range]) in the dexmedetomidine group compared with 6.0 μg ml-1 [5.5 to 7.3] in the control group (P < 0.001). Less norepinephrine was required in the dexmedetomidine group (total 454 μg [246 to 818] compared with 1000 μg [444 to 1326] (P = 0.015) in the control group). Dexmedetomidine did not affect intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Conclusion: Co-administration of dexmedetomidine to total intravenous anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy decreased the effect-site concentrations of propofol required for burst suppression by 33%. The propofol-sparing effect and peripheral alpha-agonism of dexmedetomidine may explain the reduced requirement for vasopressors.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04662177.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在颈动脉内膜剥脱术的全静脉麻醉中同时使用右美托咪定可减少对丙泊酚的需求并改善血流动力学的稳定性:单中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。
背景:颈动脉内膜切除术可在脑电图和神经电生理监测的指导下进行全静脉麻醉。在颈内动脉交叉钳夹术中使用异丙酚滴定到猝灭抑制以减少脑代谢需求时,所需的效应部位浓度可能会延迟苏醒并干扰术中神经电生理监测:目的:验证右美托咪定可降低颈动脉内膜剥脱术患者猝发抑制所需的异丙酚效应部位浓度的假设:随机对照试验:地点: 瑞士伯尔尼大学医院瑞士伯尔尼大学医院,2018年10月至2024年9月:患者被随机分为对照组(n = 23)和右美托咪定组(n = 22)。两组均采用全静脉麻醉。右美托咪定组患者在诱导前静脉注射右美托咪定(0.4 μg kg-1,10 分钟),然后持续静脉输注(0.4 μg kg-1 h-1)。异丙酚的效应部位浓度根据额叶脑电图参数进行滴定。在横断颈内动脉时用异丙酚诱导猝发抑制:主要结果是突发抑制所需的异丙酚效应部位浓度。次要结果是对血管活性物质的需求、神经电生理监测参数和术后谵妄:结果:与对照组的 6.0 μg ml-1 [5.5 至 7.3]相比,右美托咪定组爆发抑制所需的异丙酚效应部位浓度为 4.0 μg ml-1 [3.50 至 4.90](中位数[四分位间范围])(P在颈动脉内膜剥脱术的全静脉麻醉中联合使用右美托咪定,可将爆发抑制所需的异丙酚效应部位浓度降低 33%。右美托咪定的丙泊酚稀释效应和外周α-受体激动作用可能是减少血管加压剂需求的原因:试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:NCT04662177。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
期刊最新文献
A big little problem - postoperative nausea and vomiting incidences are too low! Is it time to add the letter E to the airway management guidelines? Is permissive hypercapnia really pneumoprotective? Reply to: importance of accounting for repeated measure designs when evaluating treatment effects at multiple postoperative days. Rethinking the utility of comparative studies between direct and video laryngoscopy in neonates and infants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1