Detectability of white matter cerebral blood flow using arterial spin labeling MRI in patients with sickle cell disease: Relevance of flow territory, bolus arrival time, and hematocrit

Wesley T Richerson, Megan Aumann, Alexander K Song, Jarrod J Eisma, Samantha Davis, Lauren Milner, Maria Garza, L Taylor Davis, Dann Martin, Lori C Jordan, Manus J Donahue
{"title":"Detectability of white matter cerebral blood flow using arterial spin labeling MRI in patients with sickle cell disease: Relevance of flow territory, bolus arrival time, and hematocrit","authors":"Wesley T Richerson, Megan Aumann, Alexander K Song, Jarrod J Eisma, Samantha Davis, Lauren Milner, Maria Garza, L Taylor Davis, Dann Martin, Lori C Jordan, Manus J Donahue","doi":"10.1177/0271678x241270283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common genetic blood disorder, characterized by red cell hemolysis, anemia, and corresponding increased compensatory cerebral blood flow (CBF). SCD patients are at high risk for cerebral infarcts and CBF quantification is likely critical to assess infarct risk. Infarcts primarily localize to white matter (WM), yet arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI, the most common non-invasive CBF approach, has poor WM CBF sensitivity owing to low WM CBF and long WM bolus arrival time (BAT). We hypothesize that anemia, and associated cerebral hyperemia, in SCD leads to improved WM detection with ASL. We performed 3-Tesla multi-delay pulsed ASL in SCD (n = 35; age = 30.5 ± 8.3 years) and control (n = 15; age = 28.7 ± 4.5 years) participants and applied t-tests at each inversion time within different flow territories, and determined which regions were significantly above noise floor (criteria: one-sided p < 0.05). Total WM CBF-weighted signal was primarily detectable outside of borderzone regions in SCD (CBF = 17.7 [range = 12.9–25.0] mL/100 g/min), but was largely unphysiological in control (CBF = 8.1 [range = 7.6–9.9)] mL/100 g/min) participants. WM BAT was reduced in SCD versus control participants (ΔBAT = 37 [range = 46–70] ms) and BAT directly correlated with hematocrit (Spearman’s-ρ = 0.62; p < 0.001). Findings support the feasibility of WM CBF quantification using ASL in SCD participants for appropriately parameterized protocols.","PeriodicalId":15356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678x241270283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common genetic blood disorder, characterized by red cell hemolysis, anemia, and corresponding increased compensatory cerebral blood flow (CBF). SCD patients are at high risk for cerebral infarcts and CBF quantification is likely critical to assess infarct risk. Infarcts primarily localize to white matter (WM), yet arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI, the most common non-invasive CBF approach, has poor WM CBF sensitivity owing to low WM CBF and long WM bolus arrival time (BAT). We hypothesize that anemia, and associated cerebral hyperemia, in SCD leads to improved WM detection with ASL. We performed 3-Tesla multi-delay pulsed ASL in SCD (n = 35; age = 30.5 ± 8.3 years) and control (n = 15; age = 28.7 ± 4.5 years) participants and applied t-tests at each inversion time within different flow territories, and determined which regions were significantly above noise floor (criteria: one-sided p < 0.05). Total WM CBF-weighted signal was primarily detectable outside of borderzone regions in SCD (CBF = 17.7 [range = 12.9–25.0] mL/100 g/min), but was largely unphysiological in control (CBF = 8.1 [range = 7.6–9.9)] mL/100 g/min) participants. WM BAT was reduced in SCD versus control participants (ΔBAT = 37 [range = 46–70] ms) and BAT directly correlated with hematocrit (Spearman’s-ρ = 0.62; p < 0.001). Findings support the feasibility of WM CBF quantification using ASL in SCD participants for appropriately parameterized protocols.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用动脉自旋标记磁共振成像检测镰状细胞病患者的脑白质血流:血流区域、血栓到达时间和血细胞比容的相关性
镰状细胞病(SCD)是最常见的遗传性血液疾病,以红细胞溶血、贫血和相应的代偿性脑血流(CBF)增加为特征。SCD 患者发生脑梗塞的风险很高,而 CBF 定量可能是评估脑梗塞风险的关键。脑梗塞主要发生在白质(WM),但动脉自旋标记(ASL)磁共振成像是最常见的无创 CBF 方法,但由于 WM CBF 低和 WM 药栓到达时间(BAT)长,对 WM CBF 的敏感性较差。我们假设,SCD 中的贫血及相关的脑充血会导致 ASL 对 WM 的检测能力提高。我们对 SCD 患者(n = 35;年龄 = 30.5 ± 8.3 岁)和对照组患者(n = 15;年龄 = 28.7 ± 4.5 岁)进行了 3-Tesla 多延迟脉冲 ASL 检测,并在不同血流区域的每个反转时间应用 t 检验,确定哪些区域明显高于噪声底(标准:单侧 p <0.05)。在 SCD(CBF = 17.7 [range = 12.9-25.0] mL/100 g/min)患者中,WM CBF 加权总信号主要在边界区以外的区域可检测到,但在对照组(CBF = 8.1 [range = 7.6-9.9] mL/100 g/min)患者中,CBF 加权总信号基本不符合生理状态。与对照组相比,SCD 患者的 WM BAT 减少(ΔBAT = 37 [range = 46-70] ms),且 BAT 与血细胞比容直接相关(Spearman's-ρ = 0.62; p < 0.001)。研究结果支持使用 ASL 对 SCD 参与者的 WM CBF 定量进行适当参数化方案的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Orthostatic hypotension and cerebral small vessel disease: A systematic review Microglia contact cerebral vasculature through gaps between astrocyte endfeet Detectability of white matter cerebral blood flow using arterial spin labeling MRI in patients with sickle cell disease: Relevance of flow territory, bolus arrival time, and hematocrit The relative associations of aortic and carotid artery stiffness with CeVD and cognition Refined movement analysis in the Staircase test reveals differential motor deficits in mouse models of stroke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1