Seven reasons why elementary school teachers do not encourage their students' metacognition in L1 language lessons

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Education Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1111/ejed.12740
Stéphane Colognesi, Thibault Coppe, Lara Dannau, Elise Barbier
{"title":"Seven reasons why elementary school teachers do not encourage their students' metacognition in L1 language lessons","authors":"Stéphane Colognesi, Thibault Coppe, Lara Dannau, Elise Barbier","doi":"10.1111/ejed.12740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Specifically in the field of language teaching, it has been recognized that metacognitive strategies maximize language acquisition and improve performance. But despite this, it appears that few teachers currently consider metacognition in their teaching practices. The current study adopted a qualitative design to focus on the reasons that inhibit teachers in French‐speaking Belgium from prompting their students to engage in metacognition in first‐language (L1) lessons. Semistructured interviews were conducted with seven teachers. The teachers in our sample believed that use of metacognitive strategies can provide benefits for students. But despite this, they explicitly said that they do not prompt their students to engage in metacognition in L1 language lessons. And this for seven specific reasons, as outlined in the article. Knowing these reasons allows us to target the points of attention to be had in training teachers in metacognition in L1.","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12740","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Specifically in the field of language teaching, it has been recognized that metacognitive strategies maximize language acquisition and improve performance. But despite this, it appears that few teachers currently consider metacognition in their teaching practices. The current study adopted a qualitative design to focus on the reasons that inhibit teachers in French‐speaking Belgium from prompting their students to engage in metacognition in first‐language (L1) lessons. Semistructured interviews were conducted with seven teachers. The teachers in our sample believed that use of metacognitive strategies can provide benefits for students. But despite this, they explicitly said that they do not prompt their students to engage in metacognition in L1 language lessons. And this for seven specific reasons, as outlined in the article. Knowing these reasons allows us to target the points of attention to be had in training teachers in metacognition in L1.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学教师在 L1 语言课上不鼓励学生进行元认知的七个原因
特别是在语言教学领域,人们已经认识到元认知策略可以最大限度地提高语言习得和成绩。尽管如此,目前似乎很少有教师在教学实践中考虑元认知。本研究采用定性设计,重点关注阻碍比利时法语区教师在第一语言(L1)课程中促使学生进行元认知的原因。我们对七位教师进行了半结构式访谈。我们抽样调查的教师认为,使用元认知策略能给学生带来益处。但是,尽管如此,他们明确表示,在第一语言(L1)课程中,他们并没有促使学生进行元认知。这其中有七个具体原因,文章对此进行了概述。了解了这些原因,我们就能有的放矢地对教师进行 L1 元认知培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
期刊最新文献
What Digital Competency Tells Us About E‐Learning Satisfaction of Pre‐Service Teachers CATME‐B in Secondary Education: Exploring the Perceptions of Students and Teachers Digital Active Learning Strategies in Blended Environments to Develop Students' Social and Emotional Learning Skills and Engagement in Higher Education Are Younger Students More Likely to Drop Out? Spanish Evidence on the Moderator Role of Gender and Social Origin Can AI Empower L2 Education? Exploring Its Influence on the Behavioural, Cognitive and Emotional Engagement of EFL Teachers and Language Learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1