Does Rhizobial Inoculation Change the Microbial Community in Field Soils? A‍ ‍Comparison with Agricultural Land-use Changes.

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Microbes and Environments Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1264/jsme2.me24006
Shintaro Hara,Kaori Kakizaki,Masaru Bamba,Manabu Itakura,Masayuki Sugawara,Atsuo Suzuki,Yuma Sasaki,Masanori Takeda,Kanako Tago,Tsubasa Ohbayashi,Toshihiro Aono,Luciano Nobuhiro Aoyagi,Hiroaki Shimada,Ryo Shingubara,Sachiko Masuda,Arisa Shibata,Ken Shirasu,Rota Wagai,Hiroko Akiyama,Shusei Sato,Kiwamu Minamisawa
{"title":"Does Rhizobial Inoculation Change the Microbial Community in Field Soils? A‍ ‍Comparison with Agricultural Land-use Changes.","authors":"Shintaro Hara,Kaori Kakizaki,Masaru Bamba,Manabu Itakura,Masayuki Sugawara,Atsuo Suzuki,Yuma Sasaki,Masanori Takeda,Kanako Tago,Tsubasa Ohbayashi,Toshihiro Aono,Luciano Nobuhiro Aoyagi,Hiroaki Shimada,Ryo Shingubara,Sachiko Masuda,Arisa Shibata,Ken Shirasu,Rota Wagai,Hiroko Akiyama,Shusei Sato,Kiwamu Minamisawa","doi":"10.1264/jsme2.me24006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although microbial inoculation may be effective for sustainable crop production, detrimental aspects have been argued because of the potential of inoculated microorganisms to behave as invaders and negatively affect the microbial ecosystem. We herein compared the impact of rhizobial inoculation on the soil bacterial community with that of agricultural land-use changes using a 16S rRNA amplicon ana-lysis. Soybean plants were cultivated with and without five types of bradyrhizobial inoculants (Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens or Bradyrhizobium ottawaense) in experimental fields of Andosol, and the high nodule occupancy (35-72%) of bradyrhizobial inoculants was confirmed by nosZ PCR. However, bradyrhizobial inoculants did not significantly affect Shannon's diversity index (α-diversity) or shifts (β-diversity) in the bacterial community in the soils. Moreover, the soil bacterial community was significantly affected by land-use types (conventional cropping, organic cropping, and original forest), where β-diversity correlated with soil chemical properties (pH, carbon, and nitrogen contents). Therefore, the effects of bradyrhizobial inoculation on bacterial communities in bulk soil were minor, regardless of high nodule occupancy. We also observed a correlation between the relative abundance of bacterial classes (Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Gemmatimonadetes) and land-use types or soil chemical properties. The impact of microbial inoculation on soil microbial ecosystems has been exami-ned to a limited extent, such as rhizosphere communities and viability. In the present study, we found that bacterial community shifts in soil were more strongly affected by land usage than by rhizobial inoculation. Therefore, the results obtained herein highlight the importance of assessing microbial inoculants in consideration of the entire land management system.","PeriodicalId":18482,"journal":{"name":"Microbes and Environments","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbes and Environments","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.me24006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although microbial inoculation may be effective for sustainable crop production, detrimental aspects have been argued because of the potential of inoculated microorganisms to behave as invaders and negatively affect the microbial ecosystem. We herein compared the impact of rhizobial inoculation on the soil bacterial community with that of agricultural land-use changes using a 16S rRNA amplicon ana-lysis. Soybean plants were cultivated with and without five types of bradyrhizobial inoculants (Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens or Bradyrhizobium ottawaense) in experimental fields of Andosol, and the high nodule occupancy (35-72%) of bradyrhizobial inoculants was confirmed by nosZ PCR. However, bradyrhizobial inoculants did not significantly affect Shannon's diversity index (α-diversity) or shifts (β-diversity) in the bacterial community in the soils. Moreover, the soil bacterial community was significantly affected by land-use types (conventional cropping, organic cropping, and original forest), where β-diversity correlated with soil chemical properties (pH, carbon, and nitrogen contents). Therefore, the effects of bradyrhizobial inoculation on bacterial communities in bulk soil were minor, regardless of high nodule occupancy. We also observed a correlation between the relative abundance of bacterial classes (Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Gemmatimonadetes) and land-use types or soil chemical properties. The impact of microbial inoculation on soil microbial ecosystems has been exami-ned to a limited extent, such as rhizosphere communities and viability. In the present study, we found that bacterial community shifts in soil were more strongly affected by land usage than by rhizobial inoculation. Therefore, the results obtained herein highlight the importance of assessing microbial inoculants in consideration of the entire land management system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根瘤菌接种会改变田间土壤中的微生物群落吗?与农业用地变化的比较。
虽然微生物接种可有效促进作物的可持续生产,但也有观点认为,接种的微生物有可能成为入侵者,并对微生物生态系统产生负面影响。在此,我们使用 16S rRNA 扩增子分析法比较了根瘤菌接种对土壤细菌群落的影响和农业用地变化对土壤细菌群落的影响。在安多索尔的试验田中,大豆植株在接种和不接种五种类型的根瘤菌(Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens 或 Bradyrhizobium ottawaense)的情况下生长,并通过 nosZ PCR 证实了根瘤菌接种物的高结核占据率(35-72%)。然而,根瘤菌接种剂并没有显著影响土壤中细菌群落的香农多样性指数(α-多样性)或迁移(β-多样性)。此外,土壤细菌群落还受到土地利用类型(常规种植、有机种植和原始森林)的明显影响,其中β-多样性与土壤化学性质(pH 值、碳和氮含量)相关。因此,接种双歧根瘤菌对大块土壤中细菌群落的影响很小,与高结核占有率无关。我们还观察到细菌类别(Alphaproteobacteria、Gammaproteobacteria 和 Gemmatimonadetes)的相对丰度与土地利用类型或土壤化学性质之间存在相关性。微生物接种对土壤微生物生态系统(如根瘤菌群落和生存能力)的影响研究还很有限。在本研究中,我们发现土壤中细菌群落的变化受土地利用的影响比受根瘤菌接种的影响更大。因此,本文得出的结果强调了在评估微生物接种剂时考虑整个土地管理系统的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Microbes and Environments
Microbes and Environments 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
66
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Microbial ecology in natural and engineered environments; Microbial degradation of xenobiotic compounds; Microbial processes in biogeochemical cycles; Microbial interactions and signaling with animals and plants; Interactions among microorganisms; Microorganisms related to public health; Phylogenetic and functional diversity of microbial communities; Genomics, metagenomics, and bioinformatics for microbiology; Application of microorganisms to agriculture, fishery, and industry; Molecular biology and biochemistry related to environmental microbiology; Methodology in general and environmental microbiology; Interdisciplinary research areas for microbial ecology (e.g., Astrobiology, and Origins of Life); Taxonomic description of novel microorganisms with ecological perspective; Physiology and metabolisms of microorganisms; Evolution of genes and microorganisms; Genome report of microorganisms with ecological perspective.
期刊最新文献
Size Distribution and Pathogenic Potential of Culturable Airborne Clostridium spp. in a Suburb of Toyama City, Japan. Cell cycle perturbation uncouples mitotic progression and invasive behavior in a post-mitotic cell. Gustatory Responsiveness of Honey Bees Colonized with a Defined or Conventional Gut Microbiota. DiGAlign: Versatile and Interactive Visualization of Sequence Alignment for Comparative Genomics. Global Distribution and Diversity of Marine Parmales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1