Investigating the Microarchaeological Record at Underwater Sites: Operating an On-Site Laboratory During the Antikythera Shipwreck Excavation

IF 0.7 3区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Maritime Archaeology Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1007/s11457-024-09415-5
Isaac Ogloblin Ramirez, Angeliki Simosi, Lorenz Baumer, Orestes Manousos, Patrizia Birchler Emery, Timothy Pönitz, Alexandros Sotiriou
{"title":"Investigating the Microarchaeological Record at Underwater Sites: Operating an On-Site Laboratory During the Antikythera Shipwreck Excavation","authors":"Isaac Ogloblin Ramirez, Angeliki Simosi, Lorenz Baumer, Orestes Manousos, Patrizia Birchler Emery, Timothy Pönitz, Alexandros Sotiriou","doi":"10.1007/s11457-024-09415-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Underwater excavations require an immense amount of logistics and have inherent time limitations. Underwater challenges such as nitrogen toxicity, underwater color change, and dive time limits increase with working depths, affecting the interpretation of archaeological contexts. Thus, underwater excavations involve methods and approaches to extract the maximum information from small areas while providing a comprehensive understanding of the archaeological record. Here, we present the benefits of using an on-site laboratory comprising a microscope, binocular microscope, Fourier transform infrared spectrometer and blue light inspection device. Three case studies are presented, focusing on the identification of stratigraphic boundaries, as well as the preservation and identification of archaeological materials. The results show a complex stratigraphic sequence containing seven layers divided into four mineralogical units: (1) Calcite, (2) Calcite and aragonite, (3) Aragonite, and (4) Dolomite. Additionally, the use of an on-site laboratory is effective in preventing the misidentification of archaeological materials, which could affect the final interpretation of the archaeological site (e.g., glass, lead, bone), and enabling the identification of materials invisible to the naked eye, such as opaline phytoliths. In the case of the Antikythera shipwreck, the on-site laboratory facilitated the examination of stratigraphy and quality of the archaeological context while streamlining excavation practices and documentation. Furthermore, the on-site laboratory allowed for the assessment of material preservation and provide crucial insights to inform post-excavation treatments and analysis of artifacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":43114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maritime Archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maritime Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-024-09415-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Underwater excavations require an immense amount of logistics and have inherent time limitations. Underwater challenges such as nitrogen toxicity, underwater color change, and dive time limits increase with working depths, affecting the interpretation of archaeological contexts. Thus, underwater excavations involve methods and approaches to extract the maximum information from small areas while providing a comprehensive understanding of the archaeological record. Here, we present the benefits of using an on-site laboratory comprising a microscope, binocular microscope, Fourier transform infrared spectrometer and blue light inspection device. Three case studies are presented, focusing on the identification of stratigraphic boundaries, as well as the preservation and identification of archaeological materials. The results show a complex stratigraphic sequence containing seven layers divided into four mineralogical units: (1) Calcite, (2) Calcite and aragonite, (3) Aragonite, and (4) Dolomite. Additionally, the use of an on-site laboratory is effective in preventing the misidentification of archaeological materials, which could affect the final interpretation of the archaeological site (e.g., glass, lead, bone), and enabling the identification of materials invisible to the naked eye, such as opaline phytoliths. In the case of the Antikythera shipwreck, the on-site laboratory facilitated the examination of stratigraphy and quality of the archaeological context while streamlining excavation practices and documentation. Furthermore, the on-site laboratory allowed for the assessment of material preservation and provide crucial insights to inform post-excavation treatments and analysis of artifacts.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查水下遗址的微考古记录:安提凯希拉沉船发掘期间现场实验室的运作
水下发掘需要大量的后勤工作,而且有固有的时间限制。氮气毒性、水下颜色变化和潜水时间限制等水下挑战随着工作深度的增加而增加,影响了对考古背景的解释。因此,水下发掘需要采用各种方法和手段,在全面了解考古记录的同时,从小规模区域提取最大限度的信息。在此,我们介绍了使用由显微镜、双目显微镜、傅立叶变换红外光谱仪和蓝光检测装置组成的现场实验室的好处。我们介绍了三个案例研究,重点是地层边界的鉴定以及考古材料的保存和鉴定。研究结果表明,复杂的地层序列包含七层,分为四个矿物学单元:(1) 方解石,(2) 方解石和霰石,(3) 霰石和 (4) 白云石。此外,使用现场实验室还能有效防止考古材料(如玻璃、铅、骨)的错误鉴定,以免影响对考古遗址的最终解释,并能对肉眼看不见的材料(如乳白植物碎屑)进行鉴定。在安提凯希拉沉船事件中,现场实验室促进了地层学和考古背景质量的检查,同时简化 了发掘实践和文件记录。此外,现场实验室还可以对材料保存情况进行评估,并为发掘后对文物的处理和分析提 供重要依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Journal of Maritime Archaeology is the first international journal to address all aspects of maritime archaeology, both terrestrial and under water. It encompasses theory, practice and analysis relating to sites, technology, landscape, structure, and issues of heritage management.Journal of Maritime Archaeology provides a conduit for maritime approaches reaching across archaeology and related disciplines such as cultural geography, history, ethnography, oceanography and anthropology. In so doing the journal addresses all aspects of the human past relating to maritime environments.Rated ''A'' in the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH) Journal of Maritime Archaeology is rated ''A'' in the ERHI, a new reference index that aims to help evenly access the scientific quality of Humanities research output. For more information visit http://www.esf.org/research-areas/humanities/activities/research-infrastructures.html Rated ''A'' in the Australian Research Council Humanities and Creative Arts Journal List. For more information, visit: http://www.arc.gov.au/era/journal_list_dev.htm
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Microarchaeological Record at Underwater Sites: Operating an On-Site Laboratory During the Antikythera Shipwreck Excavation Maritime Historical Cultural Heritage: Puerto Madryn City as a Case Study from Patagonia, Argentina Skin Boats in Scandinavia? Evaluating the Maritime Technologies of the Neolithic Pitted Ware Culture Maritime and Underwater Archaeology in India: A Critical Appraisal and a Future Prospect Corrosion Mechanisms and Conservation Strategies for Marine Recovered Bronze Artifacts: Insights from the Nanhai No. 1 Shipwreck
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1