Fostering Moral Resilience: Evaluating a High-Fidelity Ethics Simulation With Prelicensure Nursing Students in Their Practice as New Graduates.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Educator Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1097/nne.0000000000001733
Kathy Forte,Melinda Higgins,Rebecca D Pentz
{"title":"Fostering Moral Resilience: Evaluating a High-Fidelity Ethics Simulation With Prelicensure Nursing Students in Their Practice as New Graduates.","authors":"Kathy Forte,Melinda Higgins,Rebecca D Pentz","doi":"10.1097/nne.0000000000001733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nDespite the high prevalence of moral distress in nursing, empirical evidence is lacking about the best educational approaches to foster moral resilience.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nThis study evaluates the effectiveness of an ethics simulation in a prelicensure program, 6 months into nursing practice.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe used an exploratory design, including 2 instruments and open-ended questions. One instrument measured moral distress, the other measured moral resilience. Alumni who participated in the simulation were compared to alumni who received didactic teaching only.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSix months into practice, the quantitative data from this study did not show a statistical significance between those who received didactic training only and those who received a simulation, except for one element of the moral resilience scale (relational integrity), in which the control group had a higher score. Open-ended questions confirmed that alumni recognized the positive impact of the simulation in practice.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nFurther study is needed to determine the best educational strategies for teaching ethics in prelicensure nursing programs, with a focus on improving retention and resilience in practice.","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000001733","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Despite the high prevalence of moral distress in nursing, empirical evidence is lacking about the best educational approaches to foster moral resilience. PURPOSE This study evaluates the effectiveness of an ethics simulation in a prelicensure program, 6 months into nursing practice. METHODS We used an exploratory design, including 2 instruments and open-ended questions. One instrument measured moral distress, the other measured moral resilience. Alumni who participated in the simulation were compared to alumni who received didactic teaching only. RESULTS Six months into practice, the quantitative data from this study did not show a statistical significance between those who received didactic training only and those who received a simulation, except for one element of the moral resilience scale (relational integrity), in which the control group had a higher score. Open-ended questions confirmed that alumni recognized the positive impact of the simulation in practice. CONCLUSIONS Further study is needed to determine the best educational strategies for teaching ethics in prelicensure nursing programs, with a focus on improving retention and resilience in practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养道德韧性:评估高保真道德模拟,帮助执照前护理专业的学生在刚毕业时进行实践。
背景尽管在护理工作中道德困扰的发生率很高,但关于培养道德韧性的最佳教育方法却缺乏实证证据。目的本研究评估了在护理实践 6 个月后的执业资格前课程中道德模拟的有效性。其中一个工具测量道德困扰,另一个测量道德复原力。结果实习 6 个月后,本研究的定量数据显示,除了道德恢复力量表中的一项内容(关系完整性),对照组得分较高外,仅接受过授课培训的校友与接受过模拟训练的校友之间没有统计学意义。开放式问题证实,校友们认识到了模拟训练在实践中的积极影响。结论需要进一步研究,以确定在执业前护理课程中教授伦理道德的最佳教育策略,重点是提高留校率和在实践中的应变能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
期刊最新文献
Aligning the Clinical Judgment Management Model With Clinical Concept Mapping. Redesigning Communities of Interest Meetings for Accreditation. Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Academic Evidence-Based Practice Workshop With Faculty Certification. Building Competence in Interprofessional Partnerships in a DNP Program. Developing Nursing Competencies With Health Occupations Students of America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1