Diverse counter accounts for biodiversity conservation: The case of the High Ross Dam controversy

IF 1.7 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting History Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1177/10323732241267913
Tehmina Khan, Michael Jones
{"title":"Diverse counter accounts for biodiversity conservation: The case of the High Ross Dam controversy","authors":"Tehmina Khan, Michael Jones","doi":"10.1177/10323732241267913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The key aim of this article is to reflect on the potential impacts of various types of historical counter accounts, used by civil society to promote resistance and conservation. For this purpose, the High Ross Dam controversy (in the 1970s) represents an important and unique historical case of social–political biodiversity conservation action, by civil society. A detailed case study is presented that includes an analysis of civil society opposition through counter accounts. Technical and non-technical counter accounts of resistance by civil society are investigated, using Escobar's theoretical framework. Examples of historical counter accounts serve as outstanding precedents of civil society activism for biodiversity against business and political agendas.","PeriodicalId":45774,"journal":{"name":"Accounting History","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732241267913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The key aim of this article is to reflect on the potential impacts of various types of historical counter accounts, used by civil society to promote resistance and conservation. For this purpose, the High Ross Dam controversy (in the 1970s) represents an important and unique historical case of social–political biodiversity conservation action, by civil society. A detailed case study is presented that includes an analysis of civil society opposition through counter accounts. Technical and non-technical counter accounts of resistance by civil society are investigated, using Escobar's theoretical framework. Examples of historical counter accounts serve as outstanding precedents of civil society activism for biodiversity against business and political agendas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护生物多样性的多元化对策:高罗斯大坝争议案例
本文的主要目的是反思民间社会用于促进抵制和保护的各类历史反述的潜在影响。为此,高罗斯大坝争议(20 世纪 70 年代)是民间社会开展社会政治生物多样性保护行动的一个重要而独特的历史案例。本文介绍了一个详细的案例研究,其中包括通过反陈述分析民间社会的反对意见。利用埃斯科瓦尔的理论框架,对民间社会抵制的技术性和非技术性反陈述进行了研究。历史上的反陈述案例是民间社会为生物多样性积极反对商业和政治议程的杰出先例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting History
Accounting History BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Accounting History is an international peer reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality historical papers. These could be concerned with exploring the advent and development of accounting bodies, conventions, ideas, practices and rules. They should attempt to identify the individuals and also the local, time-specific environmental factors which affected accounting, and should endeavour to assess accounting"s impact on organisational and social functioning.
期刊最新文献
ACCOUNTING HISTORY SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP Diverse counter accounts for biodiversity conservation: The case of the High Ross Dam controversy World War 2 governmental cost-plus procurement: An Australian case study The multiple logics of Buddhist monastery accounting The qualitative leaps of the accounting discipline in Italy between the nineteenth and twentieth century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1