Technological and multi-sensory analysis approach to holistically understand the quality and consumer perception of gluten-free breads with alternative flours

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY International Journal of Food Science & Technology Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1111/ijfs.17557
Karen F. Irigoytia, Nancy N. Espósito, Marina F. de Escalada Pla, M. Belén Parodi, Carolina E. Genevois
{"title":"Technological and multi-sensory analysis approach to holistically understand the quality and consumer perception of gluten-free breads with alternative flours","authors":"Karen F. Irigoytia,&nbsp;Nancy N. Espósito,&nbsp;Marina F. de Escalada Pla,&nbsp;M. Belén Parodi,&nbsp;Carolina E. Genevois","doi":"10.1111/ijfs.17557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to characterise gluten-free breads formulated with alternative flours through technological and sensory (ultra flash profiling, hedonic tests) properties, and to correlate both methodologies for holistically understanding how these variables affect the consumer preference and product quality. Gluten-free breads formulated by replacing 20% with brown rice, lupine, millet, quinoa, sorghum, teff, buckwheat, rice bran and carob flours were evaluated. The dough hydration and fermentation times were optimised. The formulations presented differences in centesimal composition, specific volume, texture and colour. Significant correlations were established between fermentation time, specific volume, centesimal composition, texture (hardness, gumminess), alveolar structure (porosity, uniformity, cell density), colour (<i>L</i>*), sensory descriptors and overall acceptability. The ultra flash profiling test confirmed different sensory profiles, showing that some descriptors have a high impact in overall acceptability. Multiple factor analysis contributed to understand the interrelationships between technological and sensory properties, identifying the relevant technological parameters that affect the consumer preferences and the final product quality.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Food Science & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Food Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijfs.17557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to characterise gluten-free breads formulated with alternative flours through technological and sensory (ultra flash profiling, hedonic tests) properties, and to correlate both methodologies for holistically understanding how these variables affect the consumer preference and product quality. Gluten-free breads formulated by replacing 20% with brown rice, lupine, millet, quinoa, sorghum, teff, buckwheat, rice bran and carob flours were evaluated. The dough hydration and fermentation times were optimised. The formulations presented differences in centesimal composition, specific volume, texture and colour. Significant correlations were established between fermentation time, specific volume, centesimal composition, texture (hardness, gumminess), alveolar structure (porosity, uniformity, cell density), colour (L*), sensory descriptors and overall acceptability. The ultra flash profiling test confirmed different sensory profiles, showing that some descriptors have a high impact in overall acceptability. Multiple factor analysis contributed to understand the interrelationships between technological and sensory properties, identifying the relevant technological parameters that affect the consumer preferences and the final product quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用技术和多感官分析方法,全面了解使用替代面粉的无麸质面包的质量和消费者感知
摘要 本研究的目的是通过技术和感官(超闪分析、享乐主义测试)特性描述用替代面粉配制的无麸质面包,并将这两种方法关联起来,以全面了解这些变量如何影响消费者偏好和产品质量。评估了用糙米、羽扇豆、小米、藜麦、高粱、茶夫、荞麦、米糠和角豆树面粉替代 20% 配制的无麸质面包。对面团水化和发酵时间进行了优化。这些配方在百分比成分、比容、质地和颜色方面都存在差异。发酵时间、比容、百分含量、质地(硬度、胶质感)、肺泡结构(孔隙率、均匀度、细胞密度)、颜色(L*)、感官描述指标和总体可接受性之间存在显著的相关性。超闪光分析测试证实了不同的感官特征,表明某些描述指标对总体可接受性有很大影响。多因素分析有助于了解技术和感官特性之间的相互关系,确定影响消费者偏好和最终产品质量的相关技术参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
655
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Food Science & Technology (IJFST) is published for the Institute of Food Science and Technology, the IFST. This authoritative and well-established journal publishes in a wide range of subjects, ranging from pure research in the various sciences associated with food to practical experiments designed to improve technical processes. Subjects covered range from raw material composition to consumer acceptance, from physical properties to food engineering practices, and from quality assurance and safety to storage, distribution, marketing and use. While the main aim of the Journal is to provide a forum for papers describing the results of original research, review articles are also welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Effect of the membrane processing on tannin removal from soluble fraction of Persian gum From waste to wealth: sustainable approaches and novel strategies in the utilisation of food and dairy by-products – a critical review Effects of pH, kappa-carrageenan concentration and storage time on the textural and rheological properties of pea protein emulsion-gels The effects of hydrothermal treatment temperature and time on the textural characteristics of Lei bamboo shoots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1