Assessing biological invasion predatory impacts through interaction strengths and morphological trophic profiling

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Invasions Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1007/s10530-024-03435-x
Nobuhle P. Mpanza, Ross N. Cuthbert, Josephine Pegg, Ryan J. Wasserman
{"title":"Assessing biological invasion predatory impacts through interaction strengths and morphological trophic profiling","authors":"Nobuhle P. Mpanza, Ross N. Cuthbert, Josephine Pegg, Ryan J. Wasserman","doi":"10.1007/s10530-024-03435-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biological invasions are a major stressor on ecosystems worldwide, but tools to predict their predatory impact remain limited. Here, we quantified invader impacts using two complementary approaches: functional responses (to reveal <i>per capita</i> and multiple predator interaction strengths) and ecomorphology (to reveal trophic profiles and competitive overlap). We compared Mozambique tilapia <i>Oreochromis mossambicus,</i> a native southern African cichlid, and a near-trophically analogous invasive congener, the Nile tilapia <i>Oreochromis niloticus</i>. Both Nile tilapia and Mozambique tilapia exhibited a potentially prey population destabilizing Type II functional response. In both single and multiple predator pairings, invasive Nile tilapia had significantly greater prey consumption rates than native Mozambique tilapia, and thereby a greater predatory impact than its native congeneric. Attack rates were greater for Nile tilapia than Mozambique tilapia, with both species showing more similar handling times and maximum feeding rates. No evidence for multiple predator effects was detected within or between these species, and therefore impacts of both species increased additively in the presence of conspecific or heterospecific competitors. Morphological trait analyses found general differences between these two species, with the invasive Nile tilapia having distinctively larger lower jaw closing force, gill resistance and gill raker length, which facilitated greater feeding capacities over the native species. Trophic profiles predicted using morphological trait differences showed high dietary overlap and served as evidence for potential exploitative competition between the two species. These results reveal superior interaction strengths and ecomorphological trait profiles of an invasive over native species which could influence impact and native species replacement dynamics. Novel applications of functional response and ecomorphology provide complementary insights into predatory and competitive impacts from invasive species, aiding impact prediction across environmental contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9202,"journal":{"name":"Biological Invasions","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03435-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological invasions are a major stressor on ecosystems worldwide, but tools to predict their predatory impact remain limited. Here, we quantified invader impacts using two complementary approaches: functional responses (to reveal per capita and multiple predator interaction strengths) and ecomorphology (to reveal trophic profiles and competitive overlap). We compared Mozambique tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus, a native southern African cichlid, and a near-trophically analogous invasive congener, the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Both Nile tilapia and Mozambique tilapia exhibited a potentially prey population destabilizing Type II functional response. In both single and multiple predator pairings, invasive Nile tilapia had significantly greater prey consumption rates than native Mozambique tilapia, and thereby a greater predatory impact than its native congeneric. Attack rates were greater for Nile tilapia than Mozambique tilapia, with both species showing more similar handling times and maximum feeding rates. No evidence for multiple predator effects was detected within or between these species, and therefore impacts of both species increased additively in the presence of conspecific or heterospecific competitors. Morphological trait analyses found general differences between these two species, with the invasive Nile tilapia having distinctively larger lower jaw closing force, gill resistance and gill raker length, which facilitated greater feeding capacities over the native species. Trophic profiles predicted using morphological trait differences showed high dietary overlap and served as evidence for potential exploitative competition between the two species. These results reveal superior interaction strengths and ecomorphological trait profiles of an invasive over native species which could influence impact and native species replacement dynamics. Novel applications of functional response and ecomorphology provide complementary insights into predatory and competitive impacts from invasive species, aiding impact prediction across environmental contexts.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过相互作用强度和形态营养剖面评估生物入侵的捕食影响
生物入侵是全球生态系统的主要压力源,但预测其捕食影响的工具仍然有限。在这里,我们使用两种互补的方法来量化入侵者的影响:功能反应(揭示人均和多重捕食者的相互作用强度)和生态形态学(揭示营养概况和竞争重叠)。我们比较了莫桑比克罗非鱼(Oreochromis mossambicus)和尼罗罗非鱼(Oreochromis niloticus),莫桑比克罗非鱼是一种原生的南部非洲慈鲷,而尼罗罗非鱼是一种近似的入侵同类。尼罗罗非鱼和莫桑比克罗非鱼都表现出可能破坏猎物种群稳定的第二类功能反应。在单捕食者和多捕食者配对中,入侵的尼罗罗非鱼的猎物消耗率明显高于本地的莫桑比克罗非鱼,因此其捕食影响也大于本地同系鱼。尼罗罗非鱼的攻击率高于莫桑比克罗非鱼,两种鱼的处理时间和最大摄食率较为接近。在这些物种内部或之间没有发现多重捕食者效应的证据,因此在存在同种或异种竞争者的情况下,两个物种的影响都会叠加增加。形态特征分析发现这两个物种之间存在普遍差异,入侵的尼罗罗非鱼下颌闭合力、鳃阻力和鳃耙长度明显大于本地物种,这有利于提高其摄食能力。利用形态特征差异预测的营养图谱显示,两种鱼类的膳食重叠率很高,这也是两种鱼类之间潜在的开发性竞争的证据。这些结果揭示了入侵物种优于本地物种的相互作用强度和生态形态特征图谱,这可能会影响入侵物种的影响和本地物种的替代动态。功能反应和生态形态学的新应用为了解入侵物种的捕食性和竞争性影响提供了互补的视角,有助于预测不同环境下的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Invasions
Biological Invasions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
248
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Invasions publishes research and synthesis papers on patterns and processes of biological invasions in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine (including brackish) ecosystems. Also of interest are scholarly papers on management and policy issues as they relate to conservation programs and the global amelioration or control of invasions. The journal will consider proposals for special issues resulting from conferences or workshops on invasions.There are no page charges to publish in this journal.
期刊最新文献
Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand Cats in a bag: state-based spending for invasive species management across the United States is haphazard, uncoordinated, and incomplete Range expansion of the invasive hybrid cattail Typha × glauca exceeds that of its maternal plant T. angustifolia in the western Prairie Pothole Region of North America Recruitment curves of three non-native conifers in European temperate forests: implications for invasions Combining storm flood water level and topography to prioritize inter-basin transfer of non-native aquatic species in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1