Why so many Hemiptera invasions?

IF 4.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Diversity and Distributions Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1111/ddi.13911
Andrew M. Liebhold, Rebecca M. Turner, Charles R. Bartlett, Cleo Bertelsmeier, Rachael E. Blake, Eckehard G. Brockerhoff, Charlotte E. Causton, Janis N. Matsunaga, Stuart H. McKamey, Helen F. Nahrung, Christopher L. Owen, Deepa S. Pureswaran, Alain Roques, Scott A. Schneider, Allen F. Sanborn, Takehiko Yamanaka
{"title":"Why so many Hemiptera invasions?","authors":"Andrew M. Liebhold,&nbsp;Rebecca M. Turner,&nbsp;Charles R. Bartlett,&nbsp;Cleo Bertelsmeier,&nbsp;Rachael E. Blake,&nbsp;Eckehard G. Brockerhoff,&nbsp;Charlotte E. Causton,&nbsp;Janis N. Matsunaga,&nbsp;Stuart H. McKamey,&nbsp;Helen F. Nahrung,&nbsp;Christopher L. Owen,&nbsp;Deepa S. Pureswaran,&nbsp;Alain Roques,&nbsp;Scott A. Schneider,&nbsp;Allen F. Sanborn,&nbsp;Takehiko Yamanaka","doi":"10.1111/ddi.13911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The Hemiptera is the fifth-largest insect order but among non-native insect species is approximately tied with the Coleoptera as the most species-rich insect order (Hemiptera comprise 20% more species than in world fauna). This over-representation may result from high propagule pressure or from high species invasiveness. Here, we assess the reasons for over-representation in this group by analysing geographical, temporal and taxonomic variation in numbers of historical invasions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We assembled lists of historical Hemiptera invasions in 12 world regions, countries or islands (Australia, Chile, Europe, New Zealand, North America, South Africa, South Korea, Japan and the Galapagos, Hawaiian, Okinawa and Ogasawara Islands) and border interception data from nine countries (Australia, Canada, European Union, United Kingdom, Hawaii, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, USA mainland and South Africa). Using these data, we identified hemipteran superfamilies that are historically over-represented among established non-native species, and superfamilies that are over-represented among arrivals (proxied by interceptions). We also compared temporal patterns of establishments among hemipteran suborders and among regions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across all regions, patterns of over- and under-representation were similar. The Aphidoidea, Coccoidea, Aleyrodoidea, Cimicoidea and Phylloxeroida were over-represented among non-native species. These same superfamilies were not consistently over-represented among intercepted species indicating that propagule pressure does not completely explain the tendency of some Hemiptera to be over-represented among invasions. Asexual reproduction is common in most over-represented superfamilies and this trait may be key to explaining high invasion success in these superfamilies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We conclude that both propagule pressure and species invasiveness are drivers of high invasion success in the Sternorrhyncha suborder (aphids, scales, whiteflies) and this group plays a major role in the exceptional invasion success of Hemiptera in general. The high historical rates of invasion by Sternorrhyncha species provide justification for biosecurity measure focusing on exclusion of this group.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"30 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.13911","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.13911","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The Hemiptera is the fifth-largest insect order but among non-native insect species is approximately tied with the Coleoptera as the most species-rich insect order (Hemiptera comprise 20% more species than in world fauna). This over-representation may result from high propagule pressure or from high species invasiveness. Here, we assess the reasons for over-representation in this group by analysing geographical, temporal and taxonomic variation in numbers of historical invasions.

Location

Global.

Method

We assembled lists of historical Hemiptera invasions in 12 world regions, countries or islands (Australia, Chile, Europe, New Zealand, North America, South Africa, South Korea, Japan and the Galapagos, Hawaiian, Okinawa and Ogasawara Islands) and border interception data from nine countries (Australia, Canada, European Union, United Kingdom, Hawaii, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, USA mainland and South Africa). Using these data, we identified hemipteran superfamilies that are historically over-represented among established non-native species, and superfamilies that are over-represented among arrivals (proxied by interceptions). We also compared temporal patterns of establishments among hemipteran suborders and among regions.

Results

Across all regions, patterns of over- and under-representation were similar. The Aphidoidea, Coccoidea, Aleyrodoidea, Cimicoidea and Phylloxeroida were over-represented among non-native species. These same superfamilies were not consistently over-represented among intercepted species indicating that propagule pressure does not completely explain the tendency of some Hemiptera to be over-represented among invasions. Asexual reproduction is common in most over-represented superfamilies and this trait may be key to explaining high invasion success in these superfamilies.

Conclusions

We conclude that both propagule pressure and species invasiveness are drivers of high invasion success in the Sternorrhyncha suborder (aphids, scales, whiteflies) and this group plays a major role in the exceptional invasion success of Hemiptera in general. The high historical rates of invasion by Sternorrhyncha species provide justification for biosecurity measure focusing on exclusion of this group.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么会有这么多半翅虫入侵?
目的半翅目是第五大昆虫纲,但在非本地昆虫物种中,半翅目与鞘翅目并列成为物种最丰富的昆虫纲(半翅目物种比世界动物区系多 20%)。物种过多的原因可能是繁殖压力大或物种入侵性强。在此,我们通过分析历史上入侵物种数量的地理、时间和分类差异,来评估该类物种数量过多的原因。方法我们收集了世界 12 个地区、国家或岛屿(澳大利亚、智利、欧洲、新西兰、北美、南非、韩国、日本和加拉帕戈斯群岛、夏威夷、冲绳和小笠原群岛)的历史半翅目入侵名单,以及 9 个国家(澳大利亚、加拿大、欧盟、英国、夏威夷、日本、新西兰、韩国、美国本土和南非)的边境拦截数据。利用这些数据,我们确定了历史上在已建立的非本地物种中所占比例较高的半翅目超科,以及在到达物种中所占比例较高的超科(以截获量表示)。我们还比较了半翅目各亚纲之间以及各地区之间建立物种的时间模式。在非本地物种中,蚜形目(Aphidoidea)、茧形目(Coccoidea)、蝶形目(Aleyrodoidea)、蜚蠊目(Cimicoidea)和蚜蝇目(Phylloxeroida)所占比例较高。在被截获的物种中,这些超科的比例并不总是过高,这表明繁殖压力并不能完全解释某些半翅目昆虫在入侵物种中比例过高的趋势。结论我们得出结论,传播压力和物种入侵性是鞘翅目亚目(蚜虫、鳞翅目、粉虱)高入侵成功率的驱动因素,该亚目在半翅目的总体高入侵成功率中扮演了重要角色。Sternorrhyncha 物种历史上的高入侵率为采取生物安全措施提供了理由,这些措施的重点是排除该物种群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diversity and Distributions
Diversity and Distributions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
195
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover page Contrasting Patterns of Population Genomic Structure Between Broadcast-Spawning and Brooding Corals in Southeast Asia Issue Information Non-Native, Non-Naturalised Plants Suffer Less Herbivory Than Native Plants Across European Botanical Gardens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1