Causal associations between frailty and low back pain: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1007/s40520-024-02843-2
Zuying Liu, Jiaming Fan, Huilian Bu, Lijun Fu, Cong Li, Letian Ma, Cunlong Kong, Zhongyuan Lu, Xinxin Li, Jian Wang, Qingying Liu, Jingjing Yuan, Xiaochong Fan
{"title":"Causal associations between frailty and low back pain: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study","authors":"Zuying Liu,&nbsp;Jiaming Fan,&nbsp;Huilian Bu,&nbsp;Lijun Fu,&nbsp;Cong Li,&nbsp;Letian Ma,&nbsp;Cunlong Kong,&nbsp;Zhongyuan Lu,&nbsp;Xinxin Li,&nbsp;Jian Wang,&nbsp;Qingying Liu,&nbsp;Jingjing Yuan,&nbsp;Xiaochong Fan","doi":"10.1007/s40520-024-02843-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Previous observational studies have revealed a potentially robust bidirectional relationship between frailty and low back pain (LBP). However, the precise causal relationship remains unclear.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>To examine the potential causal association between frailty and LBP, we conducted bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis (MR) study. Genetic data on frailty index (FI) and LBP were acquired from publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Various MR methodologies were utilized, such as inverse variance weighting (IVW), weighted median, and MR-Egger, to evaluate causality. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the findings.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Genetically predicted higher FI (IVW, odds ratio [OR] = 1.66, 95% CI 1.17–2.36, <i>p</i> = 4.92E-03) was associated with a higher risk of LBP. As for the reverse direction, genetic liability to LBP showed consistent associations with a higher FI (IVW, OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.07–1.19, <i>p</i> = 2.67E-05). The outcomes from various MR techniques and sensitivity analyses indicate the robustness of our findings.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our research findings provide additional evidence bolstering the bidirectional causal relationship between frailty and LBP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-024-02843-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-024-02843-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Previous observational studies have revealed a potentially robust bidirectional relationship between frailty and low back pain (LBP). However, the precise causal relationship remains unclear.

Methods

To examine the potential causal association between frailty and LBP, we conducted bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis (MR) study. Genetic data on frailty index (FI) and LBP were acquired from publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Various MR methodologies were utilized, such as inverse variance weighting (IVW), weighted median, and MR-Egger, to evaluate causality. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the findings.

Results

Genetically predicted higher FI (IVW, odds ratio [OR] = 1.66, 95% CI 1.17–2.36, p = 4.92E-03) was associated with a higher risk of LBP. As for the reverse direction, genetic liability to LBP showed consistent associations with a higher FI (IVW, OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.07–1.19, p = 2.67E-05). The outcomes from various MR techniques and sensitivity analyses indicate the robustness of our findings.

Conclusion

Our research findings provide additional evidence bolstering the bidirectional causal relationship between frailty and LBP.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚弱与腰背痛之间的因果关系:双向双样本泯灭随机研究
背景以往的观察性研究显示,虚弱与腰背痛之间存在潜在的密切双向关系。为了研究虚弱与腰背痛之间的潜在因果关系,我们进行了双向双样本孟德尔随机分析(MR)研究。有关虚弱指数(FI)和枸杞多糖的遗传数据来自公开的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)。研究采用了各种 MR 方法,如反方差加权(IVW)、加权中位数和 MR-Egger,以评估因果关系。结果遗传预测的较高 FI(IVW,比值比 [OR] = 1.66,95% CI 1.17-2.36,p = 4.92E-03)与较高的枸杞痛风险相关。至于反方向,枸杞痛的遗传易感性与较高的 FI 有一致的关联(IVW,OR = 1.13,95% CI 1.07-1.19,p = 2.67E-05)。各种磁共振技术和敏感性分析的结果表明了我们研究结果的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Association between frailty status and risk of chronic lung disease: an analysis based on two national prospective cohorts Use of the Brief-BESTest partially instrumented with accelerometry to detect balance deterioration in middle-age Disability trends among elderly Ukrainians in war conditions: a 10-year retrospective study Dynamic changes in hs-CRP and risk of all-cause mortality among middle-aged and elderly adults: findings from a nationwide prospective cohort and mendelian randomization Dynapenic abdominal obesity and activities of daily living disability among older adults residing in low- and middle-income countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1