Designing Curriculum for Student Feedback Literacy: Student Appreciation for and Engagement with Teacher Feedback

IF 3.6 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Relc Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1177/00336882241269632
Angela Frattarola, Alvin Ping Leong, Yi-Chin Hsieh
{"title":"Designing Curriculum for Student Feedback Literacy: Student Appreciation for and Engagement with Teacher Feedback","authors":"Angela Frattarola, Alvin Ping Leong, Yi-Chin Hsieh","doi":"10.1177/00336882241269632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research has argued for curriculum design that promotes student feedback literacy, taking focus away from the quality and timeliness of teacher comments and toward student engagement with feedback. There is little empirical research, however, on how specific curriculum designs impact student feedback literacy. Our study found that an assignment sequence that allowed students to receive feedback from teacher comments and a consultation during the drafting process helped students to appreciate and engage with feedback, cultivating a primary trait of feedback literacy. Focus group discussions with students revealed that feedback was appreciated when it was personalized and strategically timed. We also found that feedback during the drafting process fostered an understanding of writing as a process. As students grappled with how to evaluate and utilize teacher feedback, they practiced self-regulation and took ownership of their writing, a trait that we add to the current framework for student feedback literacy. Moreover, our findings indicate that teacher feedback literacy is of equal importance to student feedback literacy, as student appreciation for feedback declined when comments focused only on lower-order issues. As this study took place in a first-year academic writing course, we conclude that such courses have the potential to offer students a foundation in student feedback literacy that they can carry with them into their academic careers.","PeriodicalId":46946,"journal":{"name":"Relc Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Relc Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241269632","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research has argued for curriculum design that promotes student feedback literacy, taking focus away from the quality and timeliness of teacher comments and toward student engagement with feedback. There is little empirical research, however, on how specific curriculum designs impact student feedback literacy. Our study found that an assignment sequence that allowed students to receive feedback from teacher comments and a consultation during the drafting process helped students to appreciate and engage with feedback, cultivating a primary trait of feedback literacy. Focus group discussions with students revealed that feedback was appreciated when it was personalized and strategically timed. We also found that feedback during the drafting process fostered an understanding of writing as a process. As students grappled with how to evaluate and utilize teacher feedback, they practiced self-regulation and took ownership of their writing, a trait that we add to the current framework for student feedback literacy. Moreover, our findings indicate that teacher feedback literacy is of equal importance to student feedback literacy, as student appreciation for feedback declined when comments focused only on lower-order issues. As this study took place in a first-year academic writing course, we conclude that such courses have the potential to offer students a foundation in student feedback literacy that they can carry with them into their academic careers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计学生反馈素养课程:学生对教师反馈的欣赏和参与
最近的研究认为,课程设计应促进学生的反馈素养,将重点从教师评语的质量和及时性转移到学生对反馈的参与上。然而,关于具体课程设计如何影响学生反馈素养的实证研究却很少。我们的研究发现,允许学生在起草过程中从教师评语和咨询中获得反馈的作业序列,有助于学生欣赏和参与反馈,培养反馈素养的主要特征。与学生进行的焦点小组讨论显示,当反馈是个性化的、有策略地适时提供时,学生会对反馈表示赞赏。我们还发现,起草过程中的反馈促进了学生对写作过程的理解。在学生努力探索如何评价和利用教师反馈意见的过程中,他们进行了自我调节,并掌握了写作的主动权,我们将这一特征加入到当前的学生反馈素养框架中。此外,我们的研究结果表明,教师的反馈素养与学生的反馈素养同等重要,因为当教师的评语只关注低层次问题时,学生对反馈的评价就会下降。由于本研究是在一年级学术写作课程中进行的,因此我们得出结论,此类课程有可能为学生打下学生反馈素养的基础,使他们能够将其带入自己的学术生涯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Relc Journal
Relc Journal LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The RELC Journal is a fully peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on language education. The aim of this Journal is to present information and ideas on theories, research, methods and materials related to language learning and teaching. Within this framework the Journal welcomes contributions in such areas of current enquiry as first and second language learning and teaching, language and culture, discourse analysis, language planning, language testing, multilingual education, stylistics, translation and information technology. The RELC Journal, therefore, is concerned with linguistics applied to education and contributions that have in mind the common professional concerns of both the practitioner and the researcher.
期刊最新文献
Twee: Artificial Intelligence Assistant to Generate Versatile Materials for Language Education Post-elicitation Wait Time in the Japanese University English as a Foreign Language Classroom Emotion–Identity–Agency Triangle in Practicum Experience: A Pre-service Second Language Teachers Development of Critical Emotional Reflexivity Cultivating Teacher Identity in a Graduate Program: A Holistic Approach EFL Learner Perceptions and Engagement of a Customized AI-led Class
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1