MRI-based and metabolomics-based age scores act synergetically for mortality prediction shown by multi-cohort federated learning

Pedro MateusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Swier GarstSection of Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the NetherlandsDelft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, Jing YuBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Davy CatsSection of Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands, Alexander G. J. HarmsBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Mahlet BirhanuBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Marian BeekmanSection of Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands, P. Eline SlagboomSection of Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands, Marcel ReindersDelft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, Jeroen van der GrondDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands, Andre DekkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jacobus F. A. JansenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the NetherlandsMental Health & Neuroscience Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the NetherlandsDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, Magdalena BeranDepartment of Internal Medicine, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Miranda T. SchramDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Internal Medicine, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Pieter Jelle VisserAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Justine MoonenAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsAmsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Mohsen GhanbariDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Gennady RoshchupkinBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Dina VojinovicDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Inigo BermejoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hailiang MeiSection of Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands, Esther E. BronBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
{"title":"MRI-based and metabolomics-based age scores act synergetically for mortality prediction shown by multi-cohort federated learning","authors":"Pedro MateusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Swier GarstSection of Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the NetherlandsDelft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, Jing YuBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Davy CatsSection of Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands, Alexander G. J. HarmsBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Mahlet BirhanuBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Marian BeekmanSection of Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands, P. Eline SlagboomSection of Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands, Marcel ReindersDelft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, Jeroen van der GrondDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands, Andre DekkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jacobus F. A. JansenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the NetherlandsMental Health & Neuroscience Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the NetherlandsDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, Magdalena BeranDepartment of Internal Medicine, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Miranda T. SchramDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Internal Medicine, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Pieter Jelle VisserAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Justine MoonenAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsAmsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Mohsen GhanbariDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Gennady RoshchupkinBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Dina VojinovicDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Inigo BermejoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hailiang MeiSection of Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands, Esther E. BronBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands","doi":"arxiv-2409.01235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biological age scores are an emerging tool to characterize aging by\nestimating chronological age based on physiological biomarkers. Various scores\nhave shown associations with aging-related outcomes. This study assessed the\nrelation between an age score based on brain MRI images (BrainAge) and an age\nscore based on metabolomic biomarkers (MetaboAge). We trained a federated deep\nlearning model to estimate BrainAge in three cohorts. The federated BrainAge\nmodel yielded significantly lower error for age prediction across the cohorts\nthan locally trained models. Harmonizing the age interval between cohorts\nfurther improved BrainAge accuracy. Subsequently, we compared BrainAge with\nMetaboAge using federated association and survival analyses. The results showed\na small association between BrainAge and MetaboAge as well as a higher\npredictive value for the time to mortality of both scores combined than for the\nindividual scores. Hence, our study suggests that both aging scores capture\ndifferent aspects of the aging process.","PeriodicalId":501266,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.01235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological age scores are an emerging tool to characterize aging by estimating chronological age based on physiological biomarkers. Various scores have shown associations with aging-related outcomes. This study assessed the relation between an age score based on brain MRI images (BrainAge) and an age score based on metabolomic biomarkers (MetaboAge). We trained a federated deep learning model to estimate BrainAge in three cohorts. The federated BrainAge model yielded significantly lower error for age prediction across the cohorts than locally trained models. Harmonizing the age interval between cohorts further improved BrainAge accuracy. Subsequently, we compared BrainAge with MetaboAge using federated association and survival analyses. The results showed a small association between BrainAge and MetaboAge as well as a higher predictive value for the time to mortality of both scores combined than for the individual scores. Hence, our study suggests that both aging scores capture different aspects of the aging process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多队列联合学习显示,基于核磁共振成像和代谢组学的年龄评分可协同预测死亡率
生物年龄分值是一种新兴的工具,它根据生理生物标志物估算计时年龄,从而描述衰老的特征。各种评分都显示与衰老相关的结果有关联。本研究评估了基于脑磁共振成像图像的年龄评分(BrainAge)与基于代谢组生物标记物的年龄评分(MetaboAge)之间的关系。我们训练了一个联合深度学习模型来估计三个队列中的脑年龄。与本地训练的模型相比,联合的 BrainAgemodel 在各队列中的年龄预测误差明显更小。统一队列间的年龄间隔进一步提高了 BrainAge 的准确性。随后,我们使用联合关联分析和生存分析比较了 BrainAge 和 MetaboAge。结果表明,BrainAge 和 MetaboAge 之间的关联很小,而且两个评分相加对死亡时间的预测价值高于单个评分。因此,我们的研究表明,这两个衰老评分反映了衰老过程的不同方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to Build the Virtual Cell with Artificial Intelligence: Priorities and Opportunities Automating proton PBS treatment planning for head and neck cancers using policy gradient-based deep reinforcement learning A computational framework for optimal and Model Predictive Control of stochastic gene regulatory networks Active learning for energy-based antibody optimization and enhanced screening Comorbid anxiety symptoms predict lower odds of improvement in depression symptoms during smartphone-delivered psychotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1