Coalitions of AI-based Methods Predict 15-Year Risks of Breast Cancer Metastasis Using Real-World Clinical Data with AUC up to 0.9

Xia Jiang, Yijun Zhou, Alan Wells, Adam Brufsky
{"title":"Coalitions of AI-based Methods Predict 15-Year Risks of Breast Cancer Metastasis Using Real-World Clinical Data with AUC up to 0.9","authors":"Xia Jiang, Yijun Zhou, Alan Wells, Adam Brufsky","doi":"arxiv-2408.16256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breast cancer is one of the two cancers responsible for the most deaths in\nwomen, with about 42,000 deaths each year in the US. That there are over\n300,000 breast cancers newly diagnosed each year suggests that only a fraction\nof the cancers result in mortality. Thus, most of the women undergo seemingly\ncurative treatment for localized cancers, but a significant later succumb to\nmetastatic disease for which current treatments are only temporizing for the\nvast majority. The current prognostic metrics are of little actionable value\nfor 4 of the 5 women seemingly cured after local treatment, and many women are\nexposed to morbid and even mortal adjuvant therapies unnecessarily, with these\nadjuvant therapies reducing metastatic recurrence by only a third. Thus, there\nis a need for better prognostics to target aggressive treatment at those who\nare likely to relapse and spare those who were actually cured. While there is a\nplethora of molecular and tumor-marker assays in use and under-development to\ndetect recurrence early, these are time consuming, expensive and still often\nun-validated as to actionable prognostic utility. A different approach would\nuse large data techniques to determine clinical and histopathological\nparameters that would provide accurate prognostics using existing data. Herein,\nwe report on machine learning, together with grid search and Bayesian Networks\nto develop algorithms that present a AUC of up to 0.9 in ROC analyses, using\nonly extant data. Such algorithms could be rapidly translated to clinical\nmanagement as they do not require testing beyond routine tumor evaluations.","PeriodicalId":501266,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.16256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the two cancers responsible for the most deaths in women, with about 42,000 deaths each year in the US. That there are over 300,000 breast cancers newly diagnosed each year suggests that only a fraction of the cancers result in mortality. Thus, most of the women undergo seemingly curative treatment for localized cancers, but a significant later succumb to metastatic disease for which current treatments are only temporizing for the vast majority. The current prognostic metrics are of little actionable value for 4 of the 5 women seemingly cured after local treatment, and many women are exposed to morbid and even mortal adjuvant therapies unnecessarily, with these adjuvant therapies reducing metastatic recurrence by only a third. Thus, there is a need for better prognostics to target aggressive treatment at those who are likely to relapse and spare those who were actually cured. While there is a plethora of molecular and tumor-marker assays in use and under-development to detect recurrence early, these are time consuming, expensive and still often un-validated as to actionable prognostic utility. A different approach would use large data techniques to determine clinical and histopathological parameters that would provide accurate prognostics using existing data. Herein, we report on machine learning, together with grid search and Bayesian Networks to develop algorithms that present a AUC of up to 0.9 in ROC analyses, using only extant data. Such algorithms could be rapidly translated to clinical management as they do not require testing beyond routine tumor evaluations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人工智能的方法联盟利用真实世界的临床数据预测乳腺癌转移的 15 年风险,AUC 高达 0.9
乳腺癌是导致女性死亡人数最多的两种癌症之一,美国每年约有 42,000 人死于乳腺癌。每年新确诊的乳腺癌患者超过 30 万,这表明只有一小部分癌症会导致死亡。因此,大多数妇女接受了看似治愈的局部癌症治疗,但也有相当一部分人死于转移性疾病,而目前的治疗方法对绝大多数人来说只是暂时性的。目前的预后指标对于经过局部治疗看似痊愈的 5 名妇女中的 4 名来说几乎没有可操作的价值,许多妇女不必要地接受了病态甚至致命的辅助治疗,而这些辅助治疗仅能减少三分之一的转移性复发。因此,需要更好的预后分析,以便针对可能复发的患者进行积极治疗,而放过那些真正治愈的患者。虽然目前有大量分子和肿瘤标志物检测方法正在使用和开发中,以早期检测复发,但这些方法耗时长、费用高,而且往往仍未验证是否具有可操作的预后效用。一种不同的方法是利用大数据技术来确定临床和组织病理学参数,从而利用现有数据提供准确的预后。在本文中,我们报告了机器学习、网格搜索和贝叶斯网络开发出的算法,这些算法仅使用现有数据进行 ROC 分析,其 AUC 可高达 0.9。这种算法无需进行常规肿瘤评估以外的测试,因此可迅速应用于临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to Build the Virtual Cell with Artificial Intelligence: Priorities and Opportunities Automating proton PBS treatment planning for head and neck cancers using policy gradient-based deep reinforcement learning A computational framework for optimal and Model Predictive Control of stochastic gene regulatory networks Active learning for energy-based antibody optimization and enhanced screening Comorbid anxiety symptoms predict lower odds of improvement in depression symptoms during smartphone-delivered psychotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1