A novel method to separate circadian from non-circadian masking effects in order to enhance daily circadian timing and amplitude estimation from core body temperature

Phuc D Nguyen, Claire Dunbar, Hannah Scott, Bastien Lechat, Jack Manners, Gorica Micic, Nicole Lovato, Amy C Reynolds, Leon Lack, Robert Adams, Danny Eckert, Andrew Vakulin, Peter G Catcheside
{"title":"A novel method to separate circadian from non-circadian masking effects in order to enhance daily circadian timing and amplitude estimation from core body temperature","authors":"Phuc D Nguyen, Claire Dunbar, Hannah Scott, Bastien Lechat, Jack Manners, Gorica Micic, Nicole Lovato, Amy C Reynolds, Leon Lack, Robert Adams, Danny Eckert, Andrew Vakulin, Peter G Catcheside","doi":"arxiv-2408.15295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Circadian disruption contributes to adverse effects on sleep, performance,\nand health. One accepted method to track continuous daily changes in circadian\ntiming is to measure core body temperature (CBT), and establish daily,\ncircadian-related CBT minimum time (Tmin). This method typically applies\ncosine-model fits to measured CBT data, which may not adequately account for\nsubstantial wake metabolic activity and sleep effects on CBT that confound and\nmask circadian effects, and thus estimates of the circadian-related Tmin. This\nstudy introduced a novel physiology-grounded analytic approach to separate\ncircadian from non-circadian effects on CBT, which we compared against\ntraditional cosine-based methods. The dataset comprised 33 healthy participants\nattending a 39-hour in-laboratory study with an initial overnight sleep\nfollowed by an extended wake period. CBT data were collected at 30-second\nintervals via ingestible capsules. Our design captured CBT during both the\nbaseline sleep period and during extended wake period (without sleep) and\nallowed us to model the influence of circadian and non-circadian effects of\nsleep, wake, and activity on CBT using physiology-guided generalized additive\nmodels. Model fits and estimated Tmin inferred from extended wake without sleep\nwere compared with traditional cosine-based models fits. Compared to the\ntraditional cosine model, the new model exhibited superior fits to CBT (Pearson\nR 0.90 [95%CI; [0.83 - 0.96] versus 0.81 [0.55-0.93]). The difference between\nestimated vs measured circadian Tmin, derived from the day without sleep, was\nbetter fit with our method (0.2 [-0.5,0.3] hours) versus previous methods (1.4\n[1.1 to 1.7] hours). This new method provides superior demasking of\nnon-circadian influences compared to traditional cosine methods, including the\nremoval of a sleep-related bias towards an earlier estimate of circadian Tmin.","PeriodicalId":501266,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.15295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Circadian disruption contributes to adverse effects on sleep, performance, and health. One accepted method to track continuous daily changes in circadian timing is to measure core body temperature (CBT), and establish daily, circadian-related CBT minimum time (Tmin). This method typically applies cosine-model fits to measured CBT data, which may not adequately account for substantial wake metabolic activity and sleep effects on CBT that confound and mask circadian effects, and thus estimates of the circadian-related Tmin. This study introduced a novel physiology-grounded analytic approach to separate circadian from non-circadian effects on CBT, which we compared against traditional cosine-based methods. The dataset comprised 33 healthy participants attending a 39-hour in-laboratory study with an initial overnight sleep followed by an extended wake period. CBT data were collected at 30-second intervals via ingestible capsules. Our design captured CBT during both the baseline sleep period and during extended wake period (without sleep) and allowed us to model the influence of circadian and non-circadian effects of sleep, wake, and activity on CBT using physiology-guided generalized additive models. Model fits and estimated Tmin inferred from extended wake without sleep were compared with traditional cosine-based models fits. Compared to the traditional cosine model, the new model exhibited superior fits to CBT (Pearson R 0.90 [95%CI; [0.83 - 0.96] versus 0.81 [0.55-0.93]). The difference between estimated vs measured circadian Tmin, derived from the day without sleep, was better fit with our method (0.2 [-0.5,0.3] hours) versus previous methods (1.4 [1.1 to 1.7] hours). This new method provides superior demasking of non-circadian influences compared to traditional cosine methods, including the removal of a sleep-related bias towards an earlier estimate of circadian Tmin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种分离昼夜节律与非昼夜节律掩蔽效应的新方法,以加强从核心体温估计每日昼夜节律的时间和振幅
昼夜节律紊乱会对睡眠、工作表现和健康产生不利影响。追踪昼夜节律的每日连续变化的一种公认方法是测量核心体温(CBT),并确定每日与昼夜节律相关的 CBT 最低时间(Tmin)。这种方法通常采用余弦模型拟合测量的 CBT 数据,但余弦模型可能无法充分考虑到大量的清醒代谢活动和睡眠对 CBT 的影响,这些活动和影响会混淆和掩盖昼夜节律效应,从而影响与昼夜节律相关的 Tmin 的估计值。这项研究引入了一种新颖的生理学分析方法,用于区分昼夜节律效应和非昼夜节律效应对 CBT 的影响,我们将其与传统的余弦分析方法进行了比较。数据集由 33 名健康参与者组成,他们参加了 39 小时的实验室研究,其中包括最初的一夜睡眠和随后的长时间清醒。CBT数据是通过可食用胶囊以30秒为间隔收集的。我们的设计同时捕捉了基准睡眠期和延长唤醒期(无睡眠)的 CBT,并允许我们使用生理学指导的广义加法模型来模拟睡眠、唤醒和活动的昼夜节律和非昼夜节律效应对 CBT 的影响。我们将模型拟合结果和通过延长唤醒而不睡眠推断出的估计 Tmin 与传统的余弦模型拟合结果进行了比较。与传统余弦模型相比,新模型的 CBT 拟合效果更好(PearsonR 0.90 [95%CI; [0.83 - 0.96] 对 0.81 [0.55-0.93])。我们的方法(0.2 [-0.5,0.3] 小时)比以前的方法(1.4[1.1-1.7] 小时)更好地拟合了从不眠日得出的估计昼夜节律 Tmin 与测量昼夜节律 Tmin 之间的差异。与传统余弦法相比,这种新方法能更好地消除非昼夜节律的影响,包括消除与睡眠有关的偏差,更早地估计昼夜节律Tmin。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to Build the Virtual Cell with Artificial Intelligence: Priorities and Opportunities Automating proton PBS treatment planning for head and neck cancers using policy gradient-based deep reinforcement learning A computational framework for optimal and Model Predictive Control of stochastic gene regulatory networks Active learning for energy-based antibody optimization and enhanced screening Comorbid anxiety symptoms predict lower odds of improvement in depression symptoms during smartphone-delivered psychotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1