“White Cord Syndrome” as clinical manifestation of the spinal cord reperfusion syndrome: a systematic review of risk factors, treatments, and outcome

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08461-w
Sadegh Bagherzadeh, Mohsen Rostami, Mohammad Jafari, Faramarz Roohollahi
{"title":"“White Cord Syndrome” as clinical manifestation of the spinal cord reperfusion syndrome: a systematic review of risk factors, treatments, and outcome","authors":"Sadegh Bagherzadeh, Mohsen Rostami, Mohammad Jafari, Faramarz Roohollahi","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08461-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>Paralysis subsequent to spinal cord decompression in the cervical or thoracic region is infrequent, with White Cord Syndrome (WCS) being among its several causes. Due to WCS’s infrequency, there exists a paucity of high-level evidence concerning its manifestations. Our primary objective is to systematically collate all documented WCS cases, discern prevalent risk and prognostic factors, appraise available treatment modalities, and evaluate patient outcomes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The search included PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria required studies to be written in English, be case reports, and contain data on clinical features, management, and treatment outcomes. Exclusion criteria excluded meta-analyses, reviews, editorials, letters, books, studies with insufficient clinical data, and studies not in English or with unavailable full texts. Grey literature was not actively pursued due to identification challenges, potentially introducing selection bias. Two authors independently evaluated papers based on criteria. Disagreements were resolved with a third author. Additionally, the included articles’ references were screened for additional relevant articles.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We found a total of 580 articles through our electronic search. After removing duplicates, 399 articles were screened. Out of the remaining 51 studies, 27 were included in the final quantitative analysis. The average age was 54 (3–79 years) with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1, 33% had OPLL, and Common medical histories were hypertension (30%), diabetes mellitus (20%), and previous ACDF surgery (8%). Of all Surgeries, 70% were done with a posterior approach and 30% with the anterior approach. 48% of cases used Intraoperative NeuroMonitoring(IONM), and Loss of Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) occurred in 37% of cases. Patients received high-dose intravenous steroids. In 26% of cases, additional posterior cervical decompression was performed, and efforts were made to maintain mean arterial pressure above 85 mmHg in 37% of cases. Other medications were administered in 30% of cases. Over an average 26-week follow-up, 37% of patients had good recovery, 40% had partial recovery, and 23% showed no recovery. The average final Nurick grade was 3.2.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>WCS is a rare cause of postoperative neurological deficit following spinal cord decompression surgery. Risk factors for WCS include advanced age, extensive surgery, posterior approach for decompression, and the presence of OPLL. Treatment includes high-dose steroids, posterior cervical decompression, maintaining MAP over 85mmHg, rehabilitation, and sometimes neurotrophic drugs. Most patients can walk with or without assistance during follow-up, but around a quarter never regain neurological function. The only preoperative factor impacting outcomes is the preoperative neurological status (Nurick Grade).</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08461-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Paralysis subsequent to spinal cord decompression in the cervical or thoracic region is infrequent, with White Cord Syndrome (WCS) being among its several causes. Due to WCS’s infrequency, there exists a paucity of high-level evidence concerning its manifestations. Our primary objective is to systematically collate all documented WCS cases, discern prevalent risk and prognostic factors, appraise available treatment modalities, and evaluate patient outcomes.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The search included PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria required studies to be written in English, be case reports, and contain data on clinical features, management, and treatment outcomes. Exclusion criteria excluded meta-analyses, reviews, editorials, letters, books, studies with insufficient clinical data, and studies not in English or with unavailable full texts. Grey literature was not actively pursued due to identification challenges, potentially introducing selection bias. Two authors independently evaluated papers based on criteria. Disagreements were resolved with a third author. Additionally, the included articles’ references were screened for additional relevant articles.

Results

We found a total of 580 articles through our electronic search. After removing duplicates, 399 articles were screened. Out of the remaining 51 studies, 27 were included in the final quantitative analysis. The average age was 54 (3–79 years) with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1, 33% had OPLL, and Common medical histories were hypertension (30%), diabetes mellitus (20%), and previous ACDF surgery (8%). Of all Surgeries, 70% were done with a posterior approach and 30% with the anterior approach. 48% of cases used Intraoperative NeuroMonitoring(IONM), and Loss of Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) occurred in 37% of cases. Patients received high-dose intravenous steroids. In 26% of cases, additional posterior cervical decompression was performed, and efforts were made to maintain mean arterial pressure above 85 mmHg in 37% of cases. Other medications were administered in 30% of cases. Over an average 26-week follow-up, 37% of patients had good recovery, 40% had partial recovery, and 23% showed no recovery. The average final Nurick grade was 3.2.

Conclusions

WCS is a rare cause of postoperative neurological deficit following spinal cord decompression surgery. Risk factors for WCS include advanced age, extensive surgery, posterior approach for decompression, and the presence of OPLL. Treatment includes high-dose steroids, posterior cervical decompression, maintaining MAP over 85mmHg, rehabilitation, and sometimes neurotrophic drugs. Most patients can walk with or without assistance during follow-up, but around a quarter never regain neurological function. The only preoperative factor impacting outcomes is the preoperative neurological status (Nurick Grade).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为脊髓再灌注综合征临床表现的 "白脊髓综合征":对风险因素、治疗方法和结果的系统回顾
目的 颈椎或胸椎区域脊髓减压术后发生瘫痪的情况并不常见,白脊髓综合征(WCS)是其多种病因之一。由于白脊髓综合征并不常见,因此有关其表现形式的高级别证据非常少。我们的主要目的是系统整理所有有文献记载的 WCS 病例,找出普遍存在的风险和预后因素,评估现有的治疗方法,并评价患者的预后。检索包括 PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 Web of Science 数据库。纳入标准要求研究以英语撰写,为病例报告,并包含临床特征、管理和治疗结果方面的数据。排除标准不包括荟萃分析、综述、社论、信件、书籍、临床数据不充分的研究,以及非英语或无法获得全文的研究。由于识别困难,灰色文献没有被积极采用,这可能会造成选择偏差。两位作者根据标准对论文进行独立评估。如有分歧,则由第三位作者解决。此外,我们还对收录文章的参考文献进行了筛选,以寻找更多相关文章。去除重复文章后,筛选出 399 篇文章。在剩余的 51 篇研究中,有 27 篇被纳入最终的定量分析。平均年龄为 54 岁(3-79 岁),男女比例为 2:1,33% 的患者患有 OPLL,常见病史为高血压(30%)、糖尿病(20%)和既往 ACDF 手术(8%)。在所有手术中,70%采用后路手术,30%采用前路手术。48%的病例使用了术中神经监测(IONM),37%的病例出现了运动诱发电位(MEP)丢失。患者接受了大剂量静脉类固醇治疗。26%的病例进行了额外的颈椎后路减压,37%的病例努力将平均动脉压维持在85毫米汞柱以上。30%的患者接受了其他药物治疗。在平均26周的随访中,37%的患者恢复良好,40%的患者部分恢复,23%的患者没有恢复。结论WCS是脊髓减压术后神经功能缺损的罕见原因。WCS的风险因素包括高龄、大范围手术、后路减压以及存在OPLL。治疗包括大剂量类固醇、颈椎后路减压、维持血压在 85mmHg 以上、康复治疗,有时还需要神经营养药物。大多数患者在随访期间可以在有人或无人协助的情况下行走,但约有四分之一的患者再也无法恢复神经功能。影响疗效的唯一术前因素是术前的神经状态(Nurick 分级)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Impact of landmark crater creation on improving accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in robot-assisted scoliosis surgery. MRI-based endplate bone quality score independently predicts cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy fusion. Letter to the editor Regarding 'Causal relationship between basal metabolic rate and intervertebral disc degeneration: a Mendelian randomization study' by Liu Z, et al. (Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun 24. Doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08367-7). Announcements. Answer to the letter to the editor of Z. Feng, et al. concerning "Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of postoperative outcomes" by Levy HA, et al. (Eur Spine J [2024]: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08412-5).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1