The Power of Laughter: Emotional and Ideological Gratification in Media

IF 1.7 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Societies Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.3390/soc14090164
Abilio Almeida, Helena Sousa
{"title":"The Power of Laughter: Emotional and Ideological Gratification in Media","authors":"Abilio Almeida, Helena Sousa","doi":"10.3390/soc14090164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the role of laughter in media content, focusing on traditional non-humorous entertainment talk shows with hosts, guests and a studio audience. The analysis, which documents over 20,000 instances of laughter in just 60 episodes (one laugh every 20 s), highlights the central role of laughter in this reality. The study concludes that: (1) hosts laughed more than guests and studio audiences; (2) in the programmes analysed, female hosts generated almost twice as much laughter as male hosts; (3) laughter followed a recognisable ‘U-shaped’ pattern, peaking at the beginning and end of the programme; (4) jokes with sexual connotations elicited the highest levels of laughter; (5) public service episodes had fewer instances of laughter; and (6) the programme with the host who laughed the most had the largest audience. In conclusion, laughter provides not only emotional, but also ideological gratification, based on the (post)modern concept of happiness.","PeriodicalId":21795,"journal":{"name":"Societies","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14090164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the role of laughter in media content, focusing on traditional non-humorous entertainment talk shows with hosts, guests and a studio audience. The analysis, which documents over 20,000 instances of laughter in just 60 episodes (one laugh every 20 s), highlights the central role of laughter in this reality. The study concludes that: (1) hosts laughed more than guests and studio audiences; (2) in the programmes analysed, female hosts generated almost twice as much laughter as male hosts; (3) laughter followed a recognisable ‘U-shaped’ pattern, peaking at the beginning and end of the programme; (4) jokes with sexual connotations elicited the highest levels of laughter; (5) public service episodes had fewer instances of laughter; and (6) the programme with the host who laughed the most had the largest audience. In conclusion, laughter provides not only emotional, but also ideological gratification, based on the (post)modern concept of happiness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
笑的力量媒体中的情感和意识形态满足
本研究以有主持人、嘉宾和演播室观众的传统非幽默娱乐脱口秀节目为重点,探讨了笑声在媒体内容中的作用。分析记录了短短 60 集节目中的 20,000 多次笑声(每 20 秒一次笑声),凸显了笑声在这一现实中的核心作用。研究得出以下结论(1)主持人比嘉宾和演播室观众笑得更多;(2)在分析的节目中,女主持人产生的笑声几乎是男主持人的两倍;(3)笑声呈明显的 "U "型,在节目开始和结束时达到顶峰;(4)带有性意味的笑话引起的笑声最多;(5)公共服务类节目的笑声较少;(6)主持人笑得最多的节目拥有最多的观众。总之,根据(后)现代幸福观,笑声不仅能带来情感上的满足,还能带来意识形态上的满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Societies
Societies SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial Resistance: The Impact from and on Society According to One Health Approach Translating Values into Quality: How We Can Use Max Weber’s Ethic of Responsibility to Rethink Professional Ethics Everyday Life Infrastructure Impact on Subjective Well-Being in the European Union: A Gender Perspective Cross-Disciplinary Rapid Scoping Review of Structural Racial and Caste Discrimination Associated with Population Health Disparities in the 21st Century Syndemic Connections: Overdose Death Crisis, Gender-Based Violence and COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1