Visualizing Neighborhood COVID-19 Levels, Trends, and Inequities in Wastewater: An Equity-Centered Approach and Comparison to CDC Methods.

Tori L Cowger,Nicholas B Link,Justin D Hart,Madeline T Sharp,Shoba Nair,Ruchita Balasubramanian,Soroush Moallef,Jarvis Chen,William P Hanage,Loni Philip Tabb,Kathryn T Hall,Bisola O Ojikutu,Nancy Krieger,Mary T Bassett
{"title":"Visualizing Neighborhood COVID-19 Levels, Trends, and Inequities in Wastewater: An Equity-Centered Approach and Comparison to CDC Methods.","authors":"Tori L Cowger,Nicholas B Link,Justin D Hart,Madeline T Sharp,Shoba Nair,Ruchita Balasubramanian,Soroush Moallef,Jarvis Chen,William P Hanage,Loni Philip Tabb,Kathryn T Hall,Bisola O Ojikutu,Nancy Krieger,Mary T Bassett","doi":"10.1097/phh.0000000000002049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nMonitoring neighborhood-level SARS-CoV-2 wastewater concentrations can help guide public health interventions and provide early warning ahead of lagging COVID-19 clinical indicators. To date, however, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Wastewater Surveillance System (NWSS) has provided methodology solely for communicating national and state-level \"wastewater viral activity levels.\"\r\n\r\nPROGRAM\r\nIn October 2022, the Boston Public Health Commission (BPHC) began routinely sampling wastewater at 11 neighborhood sites to better understand COVID-19 epidemiology and inequities across neighborhoods, which vary widely in sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics. We developed equity-centered methods to routinely report interpretable and actionable descriptions of COVID-19 wastewater levels, trends, and neighborhood-level inequities.\r\n\r\nAPPROACH AND IMPLEMENTATION\r\nTo produce these data visualizations, spanning October 2022 to December 2023, we followed four general steps: (1) smoothing raw values; (2) classifying current COVID-19 wastewater levels; (3) classifying current trends; and (4) reporting and visualizing results.\r\n\r\nEVALUATION\r\nCOVID-19 wastewater levels corresponded well with lagged COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths over time, with \"Very High\" wastewater levels coinciding with winter surges. When citywide COVID-19 levels were at the highest and lowest points, levels and trends tended to be consistent across sites. In contrast, when citywide levels were moderate, neighborhood levels and trends were more variable, revealing inequities across neighborhoods, emphasizing the importance of neighborhood-level results. Applying CDC/NWSS state-level methodology to neighborhood sites resulted in vastly different neighborhood-specific wastewater cut points for \"High\" or \"Low,\" obscured inequities between neighborhoods, and systematically underestimated COVID-19 levels during surge periods in neighborhoods with the highest COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.\r\n\r\nDISCUSSION\r\nOur methods offer an approach that other local jurisdictions can use for routinely monitoring, comparing, and communicating neighborhood-level wastewater levels, trends, and inequities. Applying CDC/NWSS methodology at the neighborhood-level can obscure and perpetuate COVID-19 inequities. We recommend jurisdictions adopt equity-focused approaches in neighborhood-level wastewater surveillance for valid community comparisons.","PeriodicalId":520109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management & Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000002049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT Monitoring neighborhood-level SARS-CoV-2 wastewater concentrations can help guide public health interventions and provide early warning ahead of lagging COVID-19 clinical indicators. To date, however, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Wastewater Surveillance System (NWSS) has provided methodology solely for communicating national and state-level "wastewater viral activity levels." PROGRAM In October 2022, the Boston Public Health Commission (BPHC) began routinely sampling wastewater at 11 neighborhood sites to better understand COVID-19 epidemiology and inequities across neighborhoods, which vary widely in sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics. We developed equity-centered methods to routinely report interpretable and actionable descriptions of COVID-19 wastewater levels, trends, and neighborhood-level inequities. APPROACH AND IMPLEMENTATION To produce these data visualizations, spanning October 2022 to December 2023, we followed four general steps: (1) smoothing raw values; (2) classifying current COVID-19 wastewater levels; (3) classifying current trends; and (4) reporting and visualizing results. EVALUATION COVID-19 wastewater levels corresponded well with lagged COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths over time, with "Very High" wastewater levels coinciding with winter surges. When citywide COVID-19 levels were at the highest and lowest points, levels and trends tended to be consistent across sites. In contrast, when citywide levels were moderate, neighborhood levels and trends were more variable, revealing inequities across neighborhoods, emphasizing the importance of neighborhood-level results. Applying CDC/NWSS state-level methodology to neighborhood sites resulted in vastly different neighborhood-specific wastewater cut points for "High" or "Low," obscured inequities between neighborhoods, and systematically underestimated COVID-19 levels during surge periods in neighborhoods with the highest COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. DISCUSSION Our methods offer an approach that other local jurisdictions can use for routinely monitoring, comparing, and communicating neighborhood-level wastewater levels, trends, and inequities. Applying CDC/NWSS methodology at the neighborhood-level can obscure and perpetuate COVID-19 inequities. We recommend jurisdictions adopt equity-focused approaches in neighborhood-level wastewater surveillance for valid community comparisons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可视化邻里 COVID-19 水平、趋势和废水中的不平等现象:以公平为中心的方法以及与 CDC 方法的比较。
CONTEXTM 监测邻里一级的 SARS-CoV-2 废水浓度有助于指导公共卫生干预措施,并在 COVID-19 临床指标滞后之前提供预警。然而,迄今为止,美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)的国家废水监测系统(NWSS)仅提供了通报国家和州一级 "废水病毒活动水平 "的方法。PROGRAM 2022 年 10 月,波士顿公共卫生委员会(BPHC)开始对 11 个社区的废水进行例行采样,以更好地了解 COVID-19 的流行病学以及各社区之间的不公平现象,这些社区的社会人口和社会经济特征差异很大。我们开发了以公平为中心的方法,以定期报告 COVID-19 废水水平、趋势和邻里间不公平现象的可解释性和可操作性描述。为了制作这些数据可视化(时间跨度为 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 12 月),我们遵循了四个一般步骤:(评估COVID-19废水水平与滞后的COVID-19住院人数和死亡人数在时间上非常吻合,"极高 "废水水平与冬季浪潮相吻合。当全市 COVID-19 水平处于最高点和最低点时,各站点的水平和趋势趋于一致。相比之下,当全市水平处于中等水平时,邻近地区的水平和趋势则变化较大,揭示了各邻近地区之间的不平等,强调了邻近地区水平结果的重要性。将 CDC/NWSS 州级方法应用于邻里站点会导致 "高 "或 "低 "的邻里特定废水切点大相径庭,掩盖了邻里之间的不平等,并系统性地低估了 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率最高的邻里在激增期间的 COVID-19 水平。在社区层面应用疾病预防控制中心/国家污水排放计划的方法可能会掩盖并延续 COVID-19 的不公平现象。我们建议各辖区在邻里级废水监测中采用注重公平的方法,以进行有效的社区比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Methods for Teaching Health Equity and Diversity, Equity Inclusion, and Accessibility to Public Health Practitioners: A Semisystematic Review of the Literature. Examining the Relationship Between Local Governmental Expenditures on the Social Determinants of Health and County-Level Overdose Deaths, 2017-2020. Impact of a University-Led COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Program. Epidemiology of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, Alameda County, California, 2017-2021. The Maternal and Child Health Workforce: A Snapshot of Current and Future Needs From Public Health WINS 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1