Small parks in residential neighborhoods as habitats for ground-dwelling beetles, spiders, and ants

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Urban Ecosystems Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1007/s11252-024-01605-2
Shinsaku Koji, Shun Furukawa, Natsuki Ichijo, Yuki Yamaguchi, Akio Tanikawa, Kazuyuki Kudô
{"title":"Small parks in residential neighborhoods as habitats for ground-dwelling beetles, spiders, and ants","authors":"Shinsaku Koji, Shun Furukawa, Natsuki Ichijo, Yuki Yamaguchi, Akio Tanikawa, Kazuyuki Kudô","doi":"10.1007/s11252-024-01605-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In residential landscapes, small neighborhood parks account for a considerable share of urban greenspaces. However, information on their significance for biodiversity conservation is limited. To determine the role of small neighborhood parks as habitat for ground-dwelling arthropods, we evaluated the effects of local and landscape factors on the diversity and traits of carabid beetles, spiders, and ants in small neighborhood parks in Niigata, Japan. Urbanization decreased carabid species richness and abundance, and it altered the species composition of carabids and spiders. The arthropods in urbanized sites were characterized by small-bodied, web-building, highly dispersive spiders, and possibly non-predatory carabids. In contrast, urbanization did not influence any diversity metrics of ants. At the local scale, ground cover, soil moisture, and park border permeability were the major drivers of arthropod diversity. Ground coverage with leaf litter was positively associated with ant occurrence. Soil moisture negatively affected carabid species richness and abundance, whereas it positively affected spider richness. Parks with humid soil conditions favored hunting, low-dispersive spiders. The low permeability of park borders decreased spider richness and altered community structure, which was characterized by highly dispersive, ballooning species. We conclude that small neighborhood parks support numerous species of habitat-generalist arthropods that are adapted to dry and open environments. These parks thus represent an important component of habitat networks in residential landscapes. Managing open environments, protecting litter layers, reducing artificial borders, and retaining other open greenspaces in the surrounding matrix can promote diverse arthropod communities. Such strategies are worth considering during urban planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":48869,"journal":{"name":"Urban Ecosystems","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01605-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In residential landscapes, small neighborhood parks account for a considerable share of urban greenspaces. However, information on their significance for biodiversity conservation is limited. To determine the role of small neighborhood parks as habitat for ground-dwelling arthropods, we evaluated the effects of local and landscape factors on the diversity and traits of carabid beetles, spiders, and ants in small neighborhood parks in Niigata, Japan. Urbanization decreased carabid species richness and abundance, and it altered the species composition of carabids and spiders. The arthropods in urbanized sites were characterized by small-bodied, web-building, highly dispersive spiders, and possibly non-predatory carabids. In contrast, urbanization did not influence any diversity metrics of ants. At the local scale, ground cover, soil moisture, and park border permeability were the major drivers of arthropod diversity. Ground coverage with leaf litter was positively associated with ant occurrence. Soil moisture negatively affected carabid species richness and abundance, whereas it positively affected spider richness. Parks with humid soil conditions favored hunting, low-dispersive spiders. The low permeability of park borders decreased spider richness and altered community structure, which was characterized by highly dispersive, ballooning species. We conclude that small neighborhood parks support numerous species of habitat-generalist arthropods that are adapted to dry and open environments. These parks thus represent an important component of habitat networks in residential landscapes. Managing open environments, protecting litter layers, reducing artificial borders, and retaining other open greenspaces in the surrounding matrix can promote diverse arthropod communities. Such strategies are worth considering during urban planning.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住宅区内的小公园是地栖甲虫、蜘蛛和蚂蚁的栖息地
在居住区景观中,小型街区公园在城市绿地中占有相当大的比例。然而,有关它们对生物多样性保护意义的信息却很有限。为了确定小型街心公园作为地栖节肢动物栖息地的作用,我们评估了当地和景观因素对日本新泻市小型街心公园中角甲虫、蜘蛛和蚂蚁的多样性和性状的影响。城市化降低了食肉目甲虫的物种丰富度和丰度,也改变了食肉目甲虫和蜘蛛的物种组成。城市化地区的节肢动物的特点是体型小、结网、高度分散的蜘蛛,以及可能是非捕食性的食蚁兽。相比之下,城市化并没有影响蚂蚁的任何多样性指标。在局部范围内,地面覆盖、土壤湿度和公园边界渗透性是节肢动物多样性的主要驱动因素。地面落叶覆盖率与蚂蚁出现率呈正相关。土壤湿度对食肉动物的物种丰富度和丰度有负面影响,而对蜘蛛的丰富度则有正面影响。土壤潮湿的公园有利于蜘蛛的狩猎和低分散性。公园边界的低渗透性降低了蜘蛛的丰富度并改变了群落结构,其特点是高分散性、气球式物种。我们的结论是,小型街区公园中栖息着大量适应干燥和开放环境的通用型节肢动物。因此,这些公园是居民区景观中栖息地网络的重要组成部分。管理开放环境、保护垃圾层、减少人工边界以及在周围基质中保留其他开放绿地,可以促进节肢动物群落的多样性。这些策略值得在城市规划中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Ecosystems
Urban Ecosystems BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Urban Ecosystems is an international journal devoted to scientific investigations of urban environments and the relationships between socioeconomic and ecological structures and processes in urban environments. The scope of the journal is broad, including interactions between urban ecosystems and associated suburban and rural environments. Contributions may span a range of specific subject areas as they may apply to urban environments: biodiversity, biogeochemistry, conservation biology, wildlife and fisheries management, ecosystem ecology, ecosystem services, environmental chemistry, hydrology, landscape architecture, meteorology and climate, policy, population biology, social and human ecology, soil science, and urban planning.
期刊最新文献
Bee community response to multiple stressors along a tropical urban-peri urban gradient Urban scavenging: vertebrates display greater sensitivity to land-cover and garden vegetation cover than invertebrates Soil unsealing in Mediterranean schoolyards: what factors drive ant communities? Wildlife resilience in an urban landscape: understanding land-use impacts in Cape Town The urban in ecology: a quantitative textual analysis of the scientific literature over a century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1