Socio-environmental drivers of human-nature interactions in urban green spaces

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Urban Ecosystems Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1007/s11252-024-01593-3
Hogyeum Evan Joo, Jeffrey A. G. Clark, Peleg Kremer, Myla F. J. Aronson
{"title":"Socio-environmental drivers of human-nature interactions in urban green spaces","authors":"Hogyeum Evan Joo, Jeffrey A. G. Clark, Peleg Kremer, Myla F. J. Aronson","doi":"10.1007/s11252-024-01593-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Online platforms have broadened the opportunities of people to interact with nature through community/citizen science, especially in urban areas. However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of the social and environmental factors that influence nature interactions in cities. Here, we aim to identify the social and environmental predictors that impact nature interactions, by combining citizen science data with environmental and demographic data in New York City. We applied generalized linear models to identify which of 12 social and environmental factors influence nature interactions in public parks (<i>n</i> = 355) in the Borough of Queens, New York, New York (USA) in two scenarios, small-medium sized parks only (<i>n</i> = 355) and all parks (<i>n</i> = 359). We used iNaturalist records, including the number of users (Observers), Observations, Observed Biodiversity, and a calculated interaction effect (number of users × observations, Interaction), as metrics of nature interactions. For small-medium parks, all nature interactions were significantly influenced by park area, canopy cover, percent population with blood pressure and asthma conditions, noise, and summer mean temperature. Observers and Interaction were positively associated with median income. Observers, Observations, and Interaction were predicted by percent water cover, impervious cover, distance to public transportation, and ethnic diversity. In the analysis that included all parks, the results were similar with minor differences. This study demonstrates a holistic approach to a very specific type of human-nature interaction newly made available with technological advances, seen through an interdisciplinary lens and will help inform planners, residents, and city government on creating more interactive and socio-environmentally beneficial urban green spaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":48869,"journal":{"name":"Urban Ecosystems","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01593-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online platforms have broadened the opportunities of people to interact with nature through community/citizen science, especially in urban areas. However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of the social and environmental factors that influence nature interactions in cities. Here, we aim to identify the social and environmental predictors that impact nature interactions, by combining citizen science data with environmental and demographic data in New York City. We applied generalized linear models to identify which of 12 social and environmental factors influence nature interactions in public parks (n = 355) in the Borough of Queens, New York, New York (USA) in two scenarios, small-medium sized parks only (n = 355) and all parks (n = 359). We used iNaturalist records, including the number of users (Observers), Observations, Observed Biodiversity, and a calculated interaction effect (number of users × observations, Interaction), as metrics of nature interactions. For small-medium parks, all nature interactions were significantly influenced by park area, canopy cover, percent population with blood pressure and asthma conditions, noise, and summer mean temperature. Observers and Interaction were positively associated with median income. Observers, Observations, and Interaction were predicted by percent water cover, impervious cover, distance to public transportation, and ethnic diversity. In the analysis that included all parks, the results were similar with minor differences. This study demonstrates a holistic approach to a very specific type of human-nature interaction newly made available with technological advances, seen through an interdisciplinary lens and will help inform planners, residents, and city government on creating more interactive and socio-environmentally beneficial urban green spaces.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市绿地中人与自然互动的社会环境驱动因素
在线平台扩大了人们通过社区/公民科学与自然互动的机会,尤其是在城市地区。然而,人们对影响城市中自然互动的社会和环境因素缺乏全面了解。在此,我们旨在通过将公民科学数据与纽约市的环境和人口数据相结合,找出影响自然互动的社会和环境预测因素。我们运用广义线性模型,在仅中小型公园(n = 355)和所有公园(n = 359)两种情况下,确定了影响美国纽约皇后区公共公园(n = 355)中自然互动的 12 个社会和环境因素。我们使用 iNaturalist 记录,包括用户数量(观察者)、观察次数、观察到的生物多样性以及计算出的交互效应(用户数量 × 观察次数,交互),作为自然交互的度量标准。对于中小型公园而言,公园面积、树冠覆盖率、患有血压和哮喘病的人口比例、噪音和夏季平均气温对所有自然交互作用都有显著影响。观察者和互动与收入中位数呈正相关。水覆盖率、不透水覆盖率、与公共交通的距离和种族多样性对观察者、观察和互动都有预测作用。在包括所有公园的分析中,结果相似,但略有不同。这项研究通过跨学科的视角,展示了随着技术进步而出现的一种非常特殊的人与自然互动的整体方法,并将有助于为规划者、居民和市政府提供信息,帮助他们创建互动性更强、对社会环境更有益的城市绿地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Ecosystems
Urban Ecosystems BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Urban Ecosystems is an international journal devoted to scientific investigations of urban environments and the relationships between socioeconomic and ecological structures and processes in urban environments. The scope of the journal is broad, including interactions between urban ecosystems and associated suburban and rural environments. Contributions may span a range of specific subject areas as they may apply to urban environments: biodiversity, biogeochemistry, conservation biology, wildlife and fisheries management, ecosystem ecology, ecosystem services, environmental chemistry, hydrology, landscape architecture, meteorology and climate, policy, population biology, social and human ecology, soil science, and urban planning.
期刊最新文献
Bee community response to multiple stressors along a tropical urban-peri urban gradient Urban scavenging: vertebrates display greater sensitivity to land-cover and garden vegetation cover than invertebrates Soil unsealing in Mediterranean schoolyards: what factors drive ant communities? Wildlife resilience in an urban landscape: understanding land-use impacts in Cape Town The urban in ecology: a quantitative textual analysis of the scientific literature over a century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1