The ancient Maya and the modern forest

IF 1.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Biotropica Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1111/btp.13370
Nicholas Brokaw, Sheila E. Ward, Timothy Beach, Sheryl Luzzadder‐Beach, Stanley Walling, Marisol Cortes‐Rincon, Fred Valdez
{"title":"The ancient Maya and the modern forest","authors":"Nicholas Brokaw, Sheila E. Ward, Timothy Beach, Sheryl Luzzadder‐Beach, Stanley Walling, Marisol Cortes‐Rincon, Fred Valdez","doi":"10.1111/btp.13370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The land use of the ancient Maya strongly affected the environment of the previously forested Maya Lowlands. A forest grew back after the Maya “collapse”, some 1100 years ago. Two activities of the ancient Maya could have had widespread effects on the tree species composition of the regrown, modern forest. First, in areas with topographic relief Maya agriculture caused substantial soil erosion and accumulation, changing soil depth and character. Soil character is associated with differential distributions and abundances of many tree species in the Maya Lowlands. To the extent that soil character on the modern landscape differs from that on the pre‐Maya landscape, regrown forests on the modern landscape would differ from pre‐Maya forests. Second, the ancient Maya cleared much forest but likely also cultivated or favored certain tree species in home gardens, regenerating farm plots, and patches of older growth. A rigorous study suggests that descendants of favored tree species persist in elevated abundance in some areas of the modern forest but not in other areas. After c. 1100 years of regrowth in some places, the legacy of the ancient Maya in the modern forest likely ranges from strong to absent across the varied landscape of the Lowlands. An ancient mosaic of forest patches would have provided a species‐rich, multiple‐point source for forest regrowth. Such a mosaic is lacking in modern deforested tropical landscapes, likely inhibiting recovery of a species‐rich forest.","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropica","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.13370","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The land use of the ancient Maya strongly affected the environment of the previously forested Maya Lowlands. A forest grew back after the Maya “collapse”, some 1100 years ago. Two activities of the ancient Maya could have had widespread effects on the tree species composition of the regrown, modern forest. First, in areas with topographic relief Maya agriculture caused substantial soil erosion and accumulation, changing soil depth and character. Soil character is associated with differential distributions and abundances of many tree species in the Maya Lowlands. To the extent that soil character on the modern landscape differs from that on the pre‐Maya landscape, regrown forests on the modern landscape would differ from pre‐Maya forests. Second, the ancient Maya cleared much forest but likely also cultivated or favored certain tree species in home gardens, regenerating farm plots, and patches of older growth. A rigorous study suggests that descendants of favored tree species persist in elevated abundance in some areas of the modern forest but not in other areas. After c. 1100 years of regrowth in some places, the legacy of the ancient Maya in the modern forest likely ranges from strong to absent across the varied landscape of the Lowlands. An ancient mosaic of forest patches would have provided a species‐rich, multiple‐point source for forest regrowth. Such a mosaic is lacking in modern deforested tropical landscapes, likely inhibiting recovery of a species‐rich forest.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古玛雅与现代森林
古玛雅人对土地的利用严重影响了玛雅低地原本森林覆盖的环境。在大约 1100 年前玛雅人 "崩溃 "之后,森林又重新生长起来。古玛雅人的两种活动可能对重新生长的现代森林的树种构成产生了广泛的影响。首先,在地形起伏较大的地区,玛雅农业造成了大量的土壤侵蚀和堆积,改变了土壤的深度和性质。土壤特性与玛雅低地许多树种的不同分布和丰度有关。如果现代地貌的土壤特性与玛雅以前的地貌不同,那么现代地貌上重新生长的森林也会与玛雅以前的森林不同。其次,古玛雅人砍伐了大量森林,但也可能在家庭菜园、再生农田和成片的老树丛中栽培或偏爱某些树种。一项严谨的研究表明,在现代森林的某些区域,受偏爱树种的后代一直保持着较高的丰度,但在其他区域则不然。经过约 1100 年在某些地方的重新生长,古玛雅在现代森林中留下的痕迹在低地的不同地貌中可能从强烈到消失不等。古代森林斑块的镶嵌为森林重新生长提供了物种丰富的多点来源。而在现代被砍伐的热带地貌中却缺乏这样的镶嵌,这很可能会阻碍物种丰富的森林的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biotropica
Biotropica 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Ranked by the ISI index, Biotropica is a highly regarded source of original research on the ecology, conservation and management of all tropical ecosystems, and on the evolution, behavior, and population biology of tropical organisms. Published on behalf of the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation, the journal''s Special Issues and Special Sections quickly become indispensable references for researchers in the field. Biotropica publishes timely Papers, Reviews, Commentaries, and Insights. Commentaries generate thought-provoking ideas that frequently initiate fruitful debate and discussion, while Reviews provide authoritative and analytical overviews of topics of current conservation or ecological importance. The newly instituted category Insights replaces Short Communications.
期刊最新文献
Taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of anuran assemblages across habitats and seasons in a Neotropical savanna Seeking a multi-dimensional approach to understand agricultural commodity expansion in Asian tropics Domestic dogs and vultures feed on the same carcasses in Wayanad Wildlife Sanctuary, Kerala, India Issue Information Seed dispersal of Madagascar's iconic baobab species, Adansonia grandidieri
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1