Organic rearing of non-castrated male pigs: welfare indicators, carcass traits, pork quality and boar taint in Duroc and Pietrain crossbreds

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animal Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.animal.2024.101316
B. Lebret , S. Ferchaud , A. Poissonnet , A. Prunier
{"title":"Organic rearing of non-castrated male pigs: welfare indicators, carcass traits, pork quality and boar taint in Duroc and Pietrain crossbreds","authors":"B. Lebret ,&nbsp;S. Ferchaud ,&nbsp;A. Poissonnet ,&nbsp;A. Prunier","doi":"10.1016/j.animal.2024.101316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main principles of organic farming as presented by the European organisation for organic food and farming are health, ecology, fairness and care, but the intrinsic quality of products is also important for consumers. Pig genotype was tested as a lever to improve animal welfare and pork quality (meat tenderness, processing ability) of organic, non-castrated males while controlling the risk for boar taint. Non-castrated Large White × Duroc (<strong>D</strong>, n = 47) or Large White × Pietrain NN (<strong>P</strong>, n = 34) males were involved in two batches, each including one group of pigs per genotype. Each group was reared in a pen from the same building on deep straw bedding (1.3 m<sup>2</sup>/pig), with a feeding zone (0.2 m<sup>2</sup>/pig) and an outdoor area (1.0 m<sup>2</sup>/pig), from 28 kg BW until slaughter at ca. 125 kg BW. All pigs received <em>ad libitum</em> the same growing and finishing diets, and hay. Overall, health and welfare indicators showed few problems, but the proportions of pigs with skin scratches, and tail lesions at the end of the finishing period, were lower in D than in P pigs (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Growth rate and final BW did not differ between genotypes. The D pigs had lower carcass lean meat content (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and relative proportions of ham and loin (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.01), and higher proportions of belly and backfat (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.001) than P pigs. Compared to P, loin (<em>Longissimus</em> muscle) of D pigs was less light and exudative and had higher chroma (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), but pH 24 h and glycolytic potential did not differ. Loin meat of D pigs had higher intramuscular fat content (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and tended to have a lower shear force (<em>P</em> = 0.09), but cooking loss did not differ. In the ham muscles, D pigs had higher chroma than P pigs in the <em>Gluteus medius</em>, whereas pH 24 h did not differ in the <em>Gluteus medius</em> and <em>Semimembranosus</em>. D pigs had higher backfat concentrations of androstenone (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and skatole and indole (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) than P pigs, suggesting a higher risk of rejection by consumers due to boar taint. However, only one D carcass was detected as tainted by human nose test. Altogether, organic farming of non-castrated Duroc crossbred males appears to be favourable for animal welfare, technological and several sensory pork properties provided that the risk of undesirable odours is limited through management practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50789,"journal":{"name":"Animal","volume":"18 10","pages":"Article 101316"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731124002532/pdfft?md5=6ec70bc96304e1c6dc5dce145d87ff5c&pid=1-s2.0-S1751731124002532-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731124002532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main principles of organic farming as presented by the European organisation for organic food and farming are health, ecology, fairness and care, but the intrinsic quality of products is also important for consumers. Pig genotype was tested as a lever to improve animal welfare and pork quality (meat tenderness, processing ability) of organic, non-castrated males while controlling the risk for boar taint. Non-castrated Large White × Duroc (D, n = 47) or Large White × Pietrain NN (P, n = 34) males were involved in two batches, each including one group of pigs per genotype. Each group was reared in a pen from the same building on deep straw bedding (1.3 m2/pig), with a feeding zone (0.2 m2/pig) and an outdoor area (1.0 m2/pig), from 28 kg BW until slaughter at ca. 125 kg BW. All pigs received ad libitum the same growing and finishing diets, and hay. Overall, health and welfare indicators showed few problems, but the proportions of pigs with skin scratches, and tail lesions at the end of the finishing period, were lower in D than in P pigs (P < 0.05). Growth rate and final BW did not differ between genotypes. The D pigs had lower carcass lean meat content (P < 0.001) and relative proportions of ham and loin (P ≤ 0.01), and higher proportions of belly and backfat (P ≤ 0.001) than P pigs. Compared to P, loin (Longissimus muscle) of D pigs was less light and exudative and had higher chroma (P < 0.05), but pH 24 h and glycolytic potential did not differ. Loin meat of D pigs had higher intramuscular fat content (P < 0.001) and tended to have a lower shear force (P = 0.09), but cooking loss did not differ. In the ham muscles, D pigs had higher chroma than P pigs in the Gluteus medius, whereas pH 24 h did not differ in the Gluteus medius and Semimembranosus. D pigs had higher backfat concentrations of androstenone (P < 0.001), and skatole and indole (P < 0.05) than P pigs, suggesting a higher risk of rejection by consumers due to boar taint. However, only one D carcass was detected as tainted by human nose test. Altogether, organic farming of non-castrated Duroc crossbred males appears to be favourable for animal welfare, technological and several sensory pork properties provided that the risk of undesirable odours is limited through management practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非阉公猪的有机饲养:杜洛克和皮特兰杂交猪的福利指标、胴体性状、猪肉质量和公猪污点
欧洲有机食品和农业组织提出的有机农业的主要原则是健康、生态、公平和关爱,但产品的内在质量对消费者来说也很重要。对猪的基因型进行了测试,以改善有机非阉公猪的动物福利和猪肉质量(肉质细嫩、加工能力),同时控制公猪疫病的风险。非阉割的大白×杜洛克(n = 47)或大白×皮特兰NN(n = 34)公猪分两批饲养,每批包括每种基因型的一组猪。每组猪在同一栋楼的圈舍中饲养,铺设深稻草垫料(1.3 米/头),设有饲喂区(0.2 米/头)和室外区(1.0 米/头),从体重 28 千克开始饲养,直到体重约 125 千克时屠宰。体重 125 千克。所有猪的生长和育成日粮以及干草均相同。总体而言,健康和福利指标显示问题很少,但在育成期结束时,D 型猪皮肤划伤和尾部损伤的比例低于 P 型猪(< 0.05)。不同基因型的生长速度和最终体重没有差异。与 P 型猪相比,D 型猪的胴体瘦肉含量 ( < 0.001) 及火腿和里脊肉的相对比例 ( ≤ 0.01) 均较低,而腹部和背部脂肪的比例 ( ≤ 0.001) 则较高。与 P 型猪相比,D 型猪的腰肉(肌肉)的光照和渗出较少,色度较高(< 0.05),但 24 h pH 值和糖酵解潜能没有差异。D 型猪的里脊肉肌肉内脂肪含量较高 ( < 0.001),剪切力较低 ( = 0.09),但烹饪损失没有差异。在火腿肌肉中,D 型猪的色度高于 P 型猪,而 24 h pH 值在 D 型猪和 P 型猪中没有差异。与 P 型猪相比,D 型猪背膘中的雄烯酮(< 0.001)、鼬烯和吲哚(< 0.05)浓度更高,这表明因野猪疫病而被消费者拒绝的风险更高。不过,经人鼻测试,只有一头 D 型猪的胴体被检测出受污染。总之,如果能通过管理措施限制产生不良气味的风险,那么有机养殖非阉割杜洛克杂交公猪似乎对动物福利、技术和猪肉的多种感官特性都很有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal
Animal 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
246
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Editorial board animal attracts the best research in animal biology and animal systems from across the spectrum of the agricultural, biomedical, and environmental sciences. It is the central element in an exciting collaboration between the British Society of Animal Science (BSAS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP) and represents a merging of three scientific journals: Animal Science; Animal Research; Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. animal publishes original cutting-edge research, ''hot'' topics and horizon-scanning reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences at the molecular, cellular, organ, whole animal and production system levels. The main subject areas include: breeding and genetics; nutrition; physiology and functional biology of systems; behaviour, health and welfare; farming systems, environmental impact and climate change; product quality, human health and well-being. Animal models and papers dealing with the integration of research between these topics and their impact on the environment and people are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Amylase activity across black soldier fly larvae development and feeding substrates: insights on starch digestibility and external digestion Comparison of predictive ability of single-trait and multitrait genomic selection models for body growth traits in Maiwa yaks Effects of oxygen levels and temperature on growth and physiology of pikeperch juveniles cultured in a recirculating aquaculture system Resolving and functional analysis of RNA editing sites in sheep ovaries and associations with litter size
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1