Effects of Statin Therapy in Patients Treated with Drug-Eluting and Drug-Coated Stents for Femoropopliteal Lesions: STAR-FP Study Outcomes

Tatsuro Takei, Takahiro Tokuda, Naoki Yoshioka, Kenji Ogata, Akiko Tanaka, Shunsuke Kojima, Kohei Yamaguchi, Takashi Yanagiuchi, Tatsuya Nakama
{"title":"Effects of Statin Therapy in Patients Treated with Drug-Eluting and Drug-Coated Stents for Femoropopliteal Lesions: STAR-FP Study Outcomes","authors":"Tatsuro Takei, Takahiro Tokuda, Naoki Yoshioka, Kenji Ogata, Akiko Tanaka, Shunsuke Kojima, Kohei Yamaguchi, Takashi Yanagiuchi, Tatsuya Nakama","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.06.24313216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThe effects of statins on drug-eluting stents (DESs) and drug-coated stents (DCSs) for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions are not well known. Therefore, this multicenter retrospective evaluated the impact of statins on DES and DCS patency.\nMethods\nBetween January 2018 and December 2021, 449 patients were treated with DES and DCS at eight cardiovascular centers in Japan (LEADers FP registry). These lesions were divided into statin-treated and non-statin-treated arms. After propensity score matching, the effects of statins on DES and DCS were evaluated. The 2-year primary outcome measure was stent patency. The secondary outcomes included secondary patency, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), limb salvage, major adverse limb events (MALE, CD-TLR+ major amputation), and a composite of overall survival and MALE or all-cause death at 2 years.\nResults\nAfter propensity score matching, the baseline and procedural characteristics did not differ significantly between the 135 patient pairs in the statin and non-statin groups. The primary patency at two years was significantly better in the statin group than in the non-statin group (86.9% vs. 75.1%, p=0.041). Regarding the secondary endpoints, the statin group demonstrated significantly superior secondary patency and freedom from MALE or all-cause mortality (95.5% vs. 87.0%, p=0.023 and 73.7% vs. 60.0%, p=0.012, respectively).\nConclusions\nThe results of this retrospective multicenter study demonstrated the superior primary patency in the statin group compared with the non-statin group at two years. These findings suggest that statins improve patency in patients undergoing DES and DCS.","PeriodicalId":501297,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.06.24313216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The effects of statins on drug-eluting stents (DESs) and drug-coated stents (DCSs) for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions are not well known. Therefore, this multicenter retrospective evaluated the impact of statins on DES and DCS patency. Methods Between January 2018 and December 2021, 449 patients were treated with DES and DCS at eight cardiovascular centers in Japan (LEADers FP registry). These lesions were divided into statin-treated and non-statin-treated arms. After propensity score matching, the effects of statins on DES and DCS were evaluated. The 2-year primary outcome measure was stent patency. The secondary outcomes included secondary patency, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), limb salvage, major adverse limb events (MALE, CD-TLR+ major amputation), and a composite of overall survival and MALE or all-cause death at 2 years. Results After propensity score matching, the baseline and procedural characteristics did not differ significantly between the 135 patient pairs in the statin and non-statin groups. The primary patency at two years was significantly better in the statin group than in the non-statin group (86.9% vs. 75.1%, p=0.041). Regarding the secondary endpoints, the statin group demonstrated significantly superior secondary patency and freedom from MALE or all-cause mortality (95.5% vs. 87.0%, p=0.023 and 73.7% vs. 60.0%, p=0.012, respectively). Conclusions The results of this retrospective multicenter study demonstrated the superior primary patency in the statin group compared with the non-statin group at two years. These findings suggest that statins improve patency in patients undergoing DES and DCS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
他汀类药物疗法对使用药物洗脱和药物涂层支架治疗股腘动脉病变患者的影响:STAR-FP 研究结果
背景他汀类药物对股骨头(FP)病变的药物洗脱支架(DES)和药物涂层支架(DCS)的影响尚不十分清楚。因此,这项多中心回顾性研究评估了他汀类药物对DES和DCS通畅性的影响。方法在2018年1月至2021年12月期间,日本8个心血管中心(LEADers FP登记处)对449名患者进行了DES和DCS治疗。这些病变被分为他汀治疗组和非他汀治疗组。经过倾向评分匹配后,评估了他汀类药物对 DES 和 DCS 的影响。2年的主要结果是支架通畅率。次要结局包括次要通畅率、临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(CD-TLR)、肢体挽救、主要肢体不良事件(MALE、CD-TLR+ 主要截肢),以及2年总生存率和MALE或全因死亡的复合结果。他汀类药物组两年后的主要通畅率明显优于非他汀类药物组(86.9% 对 75.1%,P=0.041)。在次要终点方面,他汀类药物组的次要通畅率和无MALE或全因死亡率明显优于非他汀类药物组(分别为95.5% vs. 87.0%,p=0.023和73.7% vs. 60.0%,p=0.012)。这些研究结果表明,他汀类药物可改善接受 DES 和 DCS 患者的通畅率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Where Adults with Heart Failure Die: Insights from the CDC-WONDER Database A longitudinal study of depressive symptom trajectories and risk factors in congestive heart failure Right Ventricular Work and Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Association Between Life's Essential 8 and Atherogenic Index of Plasma in Adults: Insights from NHANES 2007-2018 Efficacy and Safety of Nicorandil for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1