Evaluation of EUROSCORE II to determine the prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis: a long-term retrospective study

Jilin Li
{"title":"Evaluation of EUROSCORE II to determine the prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis: a long-term retrospective study","authors":"Jilin Li","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.23.24312516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims\nAortic stenosis (AS) was a prevalent heart valve disease whose morbidity and mortality can be reduced by aortic valve replacement (AVR) . EUROSCORE II assesses the perioperative mortality of severe AS patients undergoing AVR. This study explored EUROSCORE II's prognostic value for long-term all-cause mortality of Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe AS and determined whether AVR affects this.\nMethods\nAllocated to four groups following the EUROSCORE II (cut-off value of 4% ) and whether performed AVR, 544 patients with moderate-to-severe AS were enrolled. Baseline data, Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and subgroup analysis were used to analyse the relationship between EUROSCORE II and participants' all-cause mortality. Furthermore, ROC analysis determining the optimal cut-off value of EUROSCORE II was utilized.\nResults\nDuring a median follow-up of 41.4 months, 177 (21.5%) participants reached the endpoint, with higher risks (EUROSCORE II ≥4%) and no AVR exhibited significantly increased all-cause mortality rates compared to other groups (55.4% vs. 6.5%, 13.4%, and 32.7%; P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed these findings (log-rank test P<0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed a 6.891-fold higher risk (HR, 6.891; 95% CI, 3.083-15.401; P<0.001) in patients without AVR with higher EUROSCORE II. The adjusted model (P<0.01) and subgroup analyses (without AVR P=0.001; with AVR P=0.029) supported EUROSCORE II's prognostic value for all-cause mortality. The optimal EUROSCORE II cut-off for predicting all-cause mortality in patients without AVR was 2.23% (AUC 0.675).\nConclusions\nEUROSCORE II (cut-off value 4%) and AVR independently impact the long-term prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe AS.","PeriodicalId":501297,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.24312516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims Aortic stenosis (AS) was a prevalent heart valve disease whose morbidity and mortality can be reduced by aortic valve replacement (AVR) . EUROSCORE II assesses the perioperative mortality of severe AS patients undergoing AVR. This study explored EUROSCORE II's prognostic value for long-term all-cause mortality of Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe AS and determined whether AVR affects this. Methods Allocated to four groups following the EUROSCORE II (cut-off value of 4% ) and whether performed AVR, 544 patients with moderate-to-severe AS were enrolled. Baseline data, Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and subgroup analysis were used to analyse the relationship between EUROSCORE II and participants' all-cause mortality. Furthermore, ROC analysis determining the optimal cut-off value of EUROSCORE II was utilized. Results During a median follow-up of 41.4 months, 177 (21.5%) participants reached the endpoint, with higher risks (EUROSCORE II ≥4%) and no AVR exhibited significantly increased all-cause mortality rates compared to other groups (55.4% vs. 6.5%, 13.4%, and 32.7%; P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed these findings (log-rank test P<0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed a 6.891-fold higher risk (HR, 6.891; 95% CI, 3.083-15.401; P<0.001) in patients without AVR with higher EUROSCORE II. The adjusted model (P<0.01) and subgroup analyses (without AVR P=0.001; with AVR P=0.029) supported EUROSCORE II's prognostic value for all-cause mortality. The optimal EUROSCORE II cut-off for predicting all-cause mortality in patients without AVR was 2.23% (AUC 0.675). Conclusions EUROSCORE II (cut-off value 4%) and AVR independently impact the long-term prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe AS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用 EUROSCORE II 评估中重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后:一项长期回顾性研究
背景和目的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)是一种常见的心脏瓣膜疾病,主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)可降低其发病率和死亡率。EUROSCORE II 评估了接受主动脉瓣置换术的严重 AS 患者的围手术期死亡率。本研究探讨了 EUROSCORE II 对中国中重度 AS 患者长期全因死亡率的预后价值,并确定 AVR 是否会对此产生影响。采用基线数据、Kaplan-Meier、Cox回归和亚组分析来分析EUROSCORE II与参与者全因死亡率之间的关系。结果在中位 41.4 个月的随访期间,177 名(21.5%)参与者达到终点,与其他组别相比,风险较高(EUROSCORE II ≥4%)和未进行 AVR 的参与者的全因死亡率显著增加(55.4% vs. 6.5%、13.4% 和 32.7%;P<0.001)。卡普兰-梅耶曲线证实了这些发现(对数秩检验 P<0.001)。Cox 回归分析显示,EUROSCORE II 较高的未行 AVR 患者的风险高出 6.891 倍(HR,6.891;95% CI,3.083-15.401;P<0.001)。调整模型(P<0.01)和亚组分析(无 AVR P=0.001;有 AVR P=0.029)支持 EUROSCORE II 对全因死亡率的预后价值。预测无 AVR 患者全因死亡率的最佳 EUROSCORE II 临界值为 2.23%(AUC 0.675)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Where Adults with Heart Failure Die: Insights from the CDC-WONDER Database A longitudinal study of depressive symptom trajectories and risk factors in congestive heart failure Right Ventricular Work and Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Association Between Life's Essential 8 and Atherogenic Index of Plasma in Adults: Insights from NHANES 2007-2018 Efficacy and Safety of Nicorandil for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1