Explainable AI and tree-based ensemble models: a comparative study in predicting chemical pulmonary toxicity

Keerthana Jaganathan, P. R. Geethika, Shanmugam Ramakrishnan, Dhanasekar Sundaram
{"title":"Explainable AI and tree-based ensemble models: a comparative study in predicting chemical pulmonary toxicity","authors":"Keerthana Jaganathan, P. R. Geethika, Shanmugam Ramakrishnan, Dhanasekar Sundaram","doi":"10.1140/epjs/s11734-024-01291-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chemical-induced pulmonary toxicity, characterized by adverse respiratory effects from various drugs or chemicals, is increasingly becoming a point of concern for the pharmaceutical and chemical sectors, as well as public health. Traditional toxicity prediction methods are not only expensive but also demand significant time and effort. In response to these challenges, we focus on computational models to identify potential pulmonary toxicants early in the drug development process. Early identification of toxicity not only enhances the safety and efficiency of drugs and chemicals but also helps prevent late-stage drug withdrawals. In this study, we compared various sets of molecular descriptors and fingerprints using Mordred and RDKit software. We systematically employed feature selection techniques to identify the key molecular and structural features that significantly affect the model’s performance. We then applied a variety of tree-based ensemble machine-learning algorithms to build the proposed model, using a tenfold cross-validation methodology to enhance the model’s ability to predict pulmonary toxicity. We subsequently evaluated the proposed model’s performance using both a test set and a separate external validation set to assess reliability. The proposed optimal tree-ensemble model achieved an accuracy of 85.07% during tenfold cross-validation and 86.88% on the test set. Additionally, we applied the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach to gain deeper insights into the crucial molecular features influencing pulmonary toxicity predictions. Thus, the proposed model emerged as a promising tool for the early screening of potential pulmonary toxic compounds, enhancing chemical safety and providing interpretability for the predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":501403,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal Special Topics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal Special Topics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-024-01291-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemical-induced pulmonary toxicity, characterized by adverse respiratory effects from various drugs or chemicals, is increasingly becoming a point of concern for the pharmaceutical and chemical sectors, as well as public health. Traditional toxicity prediction methods are not only expensive but also demand significant time and effort. In response to these challenges, we focus on computational models to identify potential pulmonary toxicants early in the drug development process. Early identification of toxicity not only enhances the safety and efficiency of drugs and chemicals but also helps prevent late-stage drug withdrawals. In this study, we compared various sets of molecular descriptors and fingerprints using Mordred and RDKit software. We systematically employed feature selection techniques to identify the key molecular and structural features that significantly affect the model’s performance. We then applied a variety of tree-based ensemble machine-learning algorithms to build the proposed model, using a tenfold cross-validation methodology to enhance the model’s ability to predict pulmonary toxicity. We subsequently evaluated the proposed model’s performance using both a test set and a separate external validation set to assess reliability. The proposed optimal tree-ensemble model achieved an accuracy of 85.07% during tenfold cross-validation and 86.88% on the test set. Additionally, we applied the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach to gain deeper insights into the crucial molecular features influencing pulmonary toxicity predictions. Thus, the proposed model emerged as a promising tool for the early screening of potential pulmonary toxic compounds, enhancing chemical safety and providing interpretability for the predictions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可解释人工智能和基于树的集合模型:预测化学物质肺毒性的比较研究
化学物质引起的肺毒性是指各种药物或化学物质对呼吸系统造成的不良影响,它正日益成为制药和化工行业以及公共卫生领域关注的焦点。传统的毒性预测方法不仅成本高昂,而且需要花费大量的时间和精力。为了应对这些挑战,我们将重点放在计算模型上,以便在药物开发过程的早期识别潜在的肺毒性物质。早期识别毒性不仅能提高药物和化学品的安全性和效率,还有助于防止后期药物撤回。在这项研究中,我们使用 Mordred 和 RDKit 软件比较了各种分子描述符和指纹集。我们系统地采用了特征选择技术,以确定对模型性能有重大影响的关键分子和结构特征。然后,我们应用了多种基于树的集合机器学习算法来构建所提出的模型,并使用十倍交叉验证方法来提高模型预测肺毒性的能力。随后,我们使用测试集和单独的外部验证集评估了拟议模型的性能,以评估其可靠性。在十倍交叉验证过程中,所提出的最优树状组合模型的准确率达到了 85.07%,在测试集上的准确率达到了 86.88%。此外,我们还应用了 SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)方法,以深入了解影响肺毒性预测的关键分子特征。因此,所提出的模型有望成为早期筛选潜在肺毒性化合物的工具,从而提高化学安全性并为预测提供可解释性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classification of sprott chaotic systems via projection of the attractors using deep learning methods Master–slave synchronization of electrocardiogram chaotic networks dealing with stochastic perturbance Approximate controllability results of $$\psi$$ -Hilfer fractional neutral hemivariational inequalities with infinite delay via almost sectorial operators Characterization of magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic particle spectroscopy-based sensitive cell quantification Jet substructure probe to freeze-in dark matter in alternative cosmological background
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1