Performance of recycled concrete aggregates developed through integrated thermomechanical treatment process

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Materials and Structures Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1617/s11527-024-02431-w
Bhartesh, Gyani Jail Singh
{"title":"Performance of recycled concrete aggregates developed through integrated thermomechanical treatment process","authors":"Bhartesh,&nbsp;Gyani Jail Singh","doi":"10.1617/s11527-024-02431-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study determines how untreated recycled concrete aggregates (URA), thermally treated recycled concrete aggregates (TRA), and recycled concrete aggregates developed through an integrated thermomechanical treatment process (T<sub>m</sub>RA) perform in concrete relative to each other. A concrete composed of 100% recycled aggregates (RCA) with Portland pozzolana cement has been successfully developed in the present study. The compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, fracture energy, and modulus of elasticity of T<sub>m</sub>RC is observed higher than URC by 18.62%, 8.20%, 40.72%, 24.18%, and 54.99%, and those TRC by 7.54%, 28.57%, 29.78%, 24.12%, and 34.35%, respectively. The split tensile strength, flexural strength, fracture energy, and modulus of elasticity of these concretes are strongly correlated with their compressive strength. T<sub>m</sub>RC material properties match NAC, standard requirements, and reported values closely. URC and TRC chloride-ion penetrations are around 3.51- and 2.42-times greater than T<sub>m</sub>RC. Among these concretes, only T<sub>m</sub>RC meets corrosion protection requirements like NAC. The abrasion resistance of T<sub>m</sub>RC is observed 52.03% greater than URC and 43.07% greater than that of TRC. T<sub>m</sub>RC has substantially lower sorptivity compared to URC and TRC and is close to NAC. T<sub>m</sub>RC has around 32.65% and 16.67% less weight loss in drying than URC and TRC, respectively. URC and TRC have around 1.99- and 1.82-times less abrasion resistance than T<sub>m</sub>RC. An optimal reduced adhered-mortar volume, the minimized porosity and microcracks, dense and uniform surface texture, strengthened interfacial transition zones leads the performance of T<sub>m</sub>RA superior to URA and TRA, and close to or superior to parent aggregates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-024-02431-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study determines how untreated recycled concrete aggregates (URA), thermally treated recycled concrete aggregates (TRA), and recycled concrete aggregates developed through an integrated thermomechanical treatment process (TmRA) perform in concrete relative to each other. A concrete composed of 100% recycled aggregates (RCA) with Portland pozzolana cement has been successfully developed in the present study. The compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, fracture energy, and modulus of elasticity of TmRC is observed higher than URC by 18.62%, 8.20%, 40.72%, 24.18%, and 54.99%, and those TRC by 7.54%, 28.57%, 29.78%, 24.12%, and 34.35%, respectively. The split tensile strength, flexural strength, fracture energy, and modulus of elasticity of these concretes are strongly correlated with their compressive strength. TmRC material properties match NAC, standard requirements, and reported values closely. URC and TRC chloride-ion penetrations are around 3.51- and 2.42-times greater than TmRC. Among these concretes, only TmRC meets corrosion protection requirements like NAC. The abrasion resistance of TmRC is observed 52.03% greater than URC and 43.07% greater than that of TRC. TmRC has substantially lower sorptivity compared to URC and TRC and is close to NAC. TmRC has around 32.65% and 16.67% less weight loss in drying than URC and TRC, respectively. URC and TRC have around 1.99- and 1.82-times less abrasion resistance than TmRC. An optimal reduced adhered-mortar volume, the minimized porosity and microcracks, dense and uniform surface texture, strengthened interfacial transition zones leads the performance of TmRA superior to URA and TRA, and close to or superior to parent aggregates.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过综合热机械处理工艺开发的再生混凝土骨料的性能
本研究确定了未经处理的再生混凝土集料(URA)、热处理再生混凝土集料(TRA)和通过综合热机械处理工艺(TmRA)开发的再生混凝土集料在混凝土中的相对性能。本研究成功开发了一种由 100% 再生骨料(RCA)和波特兰毛细管水泥组成的混凝土。据观察,TmRC 的抗压强度、劈裂拉伸强度、抗折强度、断裂能和弹性模量分别比 URC 高 18.62%、8.20%、40.72%、24.18% 和 54.99%,比 TRC 高 7.54%、28.57%、29.78%、24.12% 和 34.35%。这些混凝土的劈裂拉伸强度、抗弯强度、断裂能和弹性模量与其抗压强度密切相关。TmRC 材料特性与 NAC、标准要求和报告值非常吻合。URC 和 TRC 的氯离子渗透率分别是 TmRC 的 3.51 倍和 2.42 倍。在这些混凝土中,只有 TmRC 符合 NAC 的防腐蚀要求。据观察,TmRC 的耐磨性比 URC 高 52.03%,比 TRC 高 43.07%。与 URC 和 TRC 相比,TmRC 的吸水率大大降低,接近 NAC。与 URC 和 TRC 相比,TmRC 在干燥过程中的重量损失分别减少了约 32.65% 和 16.67%。URC 和 TRC 的耐磨性分别是 TmRC 的 1.99 倍和 1.82 倍。由于最佳地减少了附着砂浆量、最大限度地减少了孔隙率和微裂缝、致密均匀的表面纹理、强化了界面过渡区,因此 TmRA 的性能优于 URA 和 TRA,接近或优于母体集料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
期刊最新文献
Effect of activator dosage and mass ratio of GGBFS to FA on 3D printing performance of kenaf geopolymer Investigation into the flexural performance of novel precast sandwich wall panels Inorganic–organic hybrid geopolymers: evolution of molecular and pore structure, and its effect on mechanical and fire-retardant properties Assessment of waste eggshell powder as a limestone alternative in portland cement Autogenous shrinkage and cracking of ultra-high-performance concrete with soda residue as an internal curing agent
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1