Exploring intrinsic and extrinsic sources of academic well-being among university teachers through Q methodology research

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1108/jarhe-04-2024-0190
Youmen Chaaban, Saba Qadhi, Xiangyun Du
{"title":"Exploring intrinsic and extrinsic sources of academic well-being among university teachers through Q methodology research","authors":"Youmen Chaaban, Saba Qadhi, Xiangyun Du","doi":"10.1108/jarhe-04-2024-0190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper investigated the intrinsic and extrinsic sources of academic well-being among university teachers at one university in Qatar, to understand how different factors influence their well-being within academia.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Drawing on systems theory, this study employs Q methodology research. Data were collected and analyzed using 35 statements (Q-items) related to academic well-being. Twenty-one university teachers participated in the study, providing a range of perspectives on the factors that influenced their academic well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The analysis revealed two distinct perspectives among the participants concerning the sources of academic well-being. Factor 1 (F-1) emphasized workplace conditions as the primary source of well-being, whereas Factor 2 (F-2) highlighted individual conditions. Additionally, a significant portion of participants did not align strongly with either factor, indicating diverse and individualized sources of well-being that suggest a complex interplay of various elements affecting academic well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The study’s sample size is limited to twenty-one university teachers at a single institution, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. Future research should consider a larger, more diverse sample to explore the universality of the findings across different academic contexts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The implications for university teachers, researchers, leaders and policymakers include a better understanding of the sources that contribute to academic well-being and the need for adopting systems thinking in addressing these sources.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study employs a unique application of Q methodology within a systems theory framework to explore the sources of academic well-being among university teachers. Unlike previous research that has primarily focused on anxiety, stress and burnout, this study provides a holistic perspective by capturing the complex interplay between organizational structures and individual identities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45508,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-04-2024-0190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper investigated the intrinsic and extrinsic sources of academic well-being among university teachers at one university in Qatar, to understand how different factors influence their well-being within academia.

Design/methodology/approach

Drawing on systems theory, this study employs Q methodology research. Data were collected and analyzed using 35 statements (Q-items) related to academic well-being. Twenty-one university teachers participated in the study, providing a range of perspectives on the factors that influenced their academic well-being.

Findings

The analysis revealed two distinct perspectives among the participants concerning the sources of academic well-being. Factor 1 (F-1) emphasized workplace conditions as the primary source of well-being, whereas Factor 2 (F-2) highlighted individual conditions. Additionally, a significant portion of participants did not align strongly with either factor, indicating diverse and individualized sources of well-being that suggest a complex interplay of various elements affecting academic well-being.

Research limitations/implications

The study’s sample size is limited to twenty-one university teachers at a single institution, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. Future research should consider a larger, more diverse sample to explore the universality of the findings across different academic contexts.

Practical implications

The implications for university teachers, researchers, leaders and policymakers include a better understanding of the sources that contribute to academic well-being and the need for adopting systems thinking in addressing these sources.

Originality/value

This study employs a unique application of Q methodology within a systems theory framework to explore the sources of academic well-being among university teachers. Unlike previous research that has primarily focused on anxiety, stress and burnout, this study provides a holistic perspective by capturing the complex interplay between organizational structures and individual identities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过 Q 方法研究探索大学教师学术幸福感的内在和外在来源
目的 本文调查了卡塔尔一所大学教师学术幸福感的内在和外在来源,以了解不同因素如何影响他们在学术界的幸福感。使用与学术幸福感相关的 35 个陈述(Q 项)收集和分析数据。21 名大学教师参与了研究,他们从不同角度阐述了影响其学术幸福感的因素。研究结果分析表明,参与者对学术幸福感的来源有两种不同的观点。因素 1(F-1)强调工作场所条件是幸福感的主要来源,而因素 2(F-2)则强调个人条件。此外,相当一部分参与者并不十分认同其中任何一个因子,这表明幸福感的来源是多样化和个性化的,表明影响学术幸福感的各种因素之间存在着复杂的相互作用。对大学教师、研究人员、领导者和政策制定者的启示包括:更好地理解学术幸福感的来源,以及在解决这些来源时采用系统思维的必要性。与以往主要关注焦虑、压力和职业倦怠的研究不同,本研究通过捕捉组织结构和个人身份之间复杂的相互作用,提供了一个整体视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Higher education around the world has become a major topic of discussion, debate, and controversy, as a range of political, economic, social, and technological pressures result in a myriad of changes at all levels. But the quality and quantity of critical dialogue and research and their relationship with practice remains limited. This internationally peer-reviewed journal addresses this shortfall by focusing on the scholarship and practice of teaching and learning and higher education and covers: - Higher education teaching, learning, curriculum, assessment, policy, management, leadership, and related areas - Digitization, internationalization, and democratization of higher education, and related areas such as lifelong and lifewide learning - Innovation, change, and reflections on current practices
期刊最新文献
Improving students’ academic integrity through academic integrity training (AIT) program in higher education Adapting accounting education to evolving business paradigm-an Indian perspective Second language writing anxiety and ChatGPT adoption as an automated writing evaluation tool Remote learning and exploring the factors affecting students' adoption of behavioral intentions toward conference applications Locus of control, academic procrastination and academic performance amongst university students: moderating role of parental involvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1