Editorial Commentary: Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Shows Positive Midterm Outcomes When Properly Indicated

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.006
Jon Karlsson M.D., Ph.D. , Thorkell Snaebjörnsson M.D., Ph.D.
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Shows Positive Midterm Outcomes When Properly Indicated","authors":"Jon Karlsson M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Thorkell Snaebjörnsson M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the gold standard treatment for ACL injury and has been shown to restore the 3-dimensional joint laxity. Recently, however, there is renewed interest in primary repair of the injured ACL in selected cases. Research shows that, in some cases, short- and midterm outcomes of ACL repair are favorable, albeit with greater failure rates than ACL reconstruction. No long-term outcomes are yet available, which could address whether repair reduces risk of osteoarthritis relative to reconstruction with a graft. Historically, primary repair showed poor outcomes, but for proximal and acute injuries with good vascularity, innovations such as suture anchors, dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, and suture tape augmentation show promise, particularly in paediatric patients. The old orthopaedic dogma that “ACL cannot heal” is not entirely correct.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"40 12","pages":"Pages 2872-2874"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806324006662","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the gold standard treatment for ACL injury and has been shown to restore the 3-dimensional joint laxity. Recently, however, there is renewed interest in primary repair of the injured ACL in selected cases. Research shows that, in some cases, short- and midterm outcomes of ACL repair are favorable, albeit with greater failure rates than ACL reconstruction. No long-term outcomes are yet available, which could address whether repair reduces risk of osteoarthritis relative to reconstruction with a graft. Historically, primary repair showed poor outcomes, but for proximal and acute injuries with good vascularity, innovations such as suture anchors, dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, and suture tape augmentation show promise, particularly in paediatric patients. The old orthopaedic dogma that “ACL cannot heal” is not entirely correct.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前交叉韧带的初次修复在适当的情况下可取得积极的中期疗效。
解剖性前交叉韧带(ACL)重建是治疗前交叉韧带损伤的金标准,已被证明能恢复三维关节松弛。但最近,人们对在特定病例中对受伤的前十字韧带进行初次修复再次产生了兴趣。研究表明,在某些情况下,前交叉韧带修复术的短期和中期疗效良好,尽管失败率高于前交叉韧带重建术。目前还没有长期的研究结果,因此无法确定修复术是否比移植重建术降低了骨关节炎的风险。从历史上看,初次修复的效果不佳,但对于血管良好的近端和急性损伤,缝合锚、韧带内动态稳定和缝合带增强等创新技术显示了前景,尤其是在儿童患者中。前交叉韧带无法愈合 "这一古老的骨科教条并不完全正确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Hip Arthroscopy Yields Favorable Outcome, Return-to-Sport Rate, and 5-Year Survivorship in Athletic Population With Generalized Ligamentous Laxity in the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Tears. Tranexamic Acid Use in Hip Arthroscopy Reduces Bleeding Without Increased Risk of Major Complications: A Systematic Review. Instructions for Authors Announcements Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1