A Comparative Study Recognizing the Expression of Information Between Elderly Individuals and Young Individuals

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychology Research and Behavior Management Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.2147/prbm.s471196
Jialin Ma, Xiaojing Liu, Yongxin Li
{"title":"A Comparative Study Recognizing the Expression of Information Between Elderly Individuals and Young Individuals","authors":"Jialin Ma, Xiaojing Liu, Yongxin Li","doi":"10.2147/prbm.s471196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> Studies have shown that elderly individuals have significantly worse facial expression recognition scores than young adults. Some have suggested that this difference is due to perceptual degradation, while others suggest it is due to decreased attention of elderly individuals to the most informative regions of the face.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> To resolve this controversy, this study recruited 85 participants and used a behavioral task and eye-tracking techniques (EyeLink 1000 Plus eye tracker). It adopted the “study-recognition” paradigm, and a mixed experimental design of 3 (facial expressions: positive, neutral, negative) × 2 (subjects’ age: young, old) × 3 (facial areas of interest: eyes, nose, and mouth) was used to explore whether there was perceptual degradation in older people’s attention to facial expressions and investigate the differences in diagnostic areas between young and older people.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> The behavioral results revealed that young participants had significantly higher facial expression recognition scores than older participants did; moreover, the eye-tracking results revealed that younger people generally fixated on faces significantly more than elderly people, demonstrating the perceptual degradation in elderly people. Young people primarily look at the eyes, followed by the nose and, finally, the mouth when examining facial expressions. The elderly participants primarily focus on the eyes, followed by the mouth and then the nose.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The findings confirmed that young participants have better facial expression recognition performance than elderly participants, which may be related more to perceptual degradation than to decreased attention to informative areas of the face. For elderly people, the duration of gaze toward the facial diagnosis area (such as the eyes) should be increased when recognizing faces to compensate for the disadvantage of decreased facial recognition performance caused by perceptual aging.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s471196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown that elderly individuals have significantly worse facial expression recognition scores than young adults. Some have suggested that this difference is due to perceptual degradation, while others suggest it is due to decreased attention of elderly individuals to the most informative regions of the face.
Methods: To resolve this controversy, this study recruited 85 participants and used a behavioral task and eye-tracking techniques (EyeLink 1000 Plus eye tracker). It adopted the “study-recognition” paradigm, and a mixed experimental design of 3 (facial expressions: positive, neutral, negative) × 2 (subjects’ age: young, old) × 3 (facial areas of interest: eyes, nose, and mouth) was used to explore whether there was perceptual degradation in older people’s attention to facial expressions and investigate the differences in diagnostic areas between young and older people.
Results: The behavioral results revealed that young participants had significantly higher facial expression recognition scores than older participants did; moreover, the eye-tracking results revealed that younger people generally fixated on faces significantly more than elderly people, demonstrating the perceptual degradation in elderly people. Young people primarily look at the eyes, followed by the nose and, finally, the mouth when examining facial expressions. The elderly participants primarily focus on the eyes, followed by the mouth and then the nose.
Conclusion: The findings confirmed that young participants have better facial expression recognition performance than elderly participants, which may be related more to perceptual degradation than to decreased attention to informative areas of the face. For elderly people, the duration of gaze toward the facial diagnosis area (such as the eyes) should be increased when recognizing faces to compensate for the disadvantage of decreased facial recognition performance caused by perceptual aging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认识老年人与年轻人信息表达方式的比较研究
研究背景研究表明,老年人的面部表情识别得分明显低于年轻人。一些人认为这种差异是由于知觉退化造成的,而另一些人则认为这是由于老年人对面部信息量最大区域的注意力下降造成的:为了解决这一争议,本研究招募了 85 名参与者,并使用了行为任务和眼动追踪技术(EyeLink 1000 Plus 眼动追踪器)。研究采用 "学习-识别 "范式,以 3(面部表情:正面、中性、负面)×2(受试者年龄:年轻、年长)×3(面部感兴趣区域:眼睛、鼻子、嘴巴)的混合实验设计,探讨老年人对面部表情的注意是否存在知觉退化,并研究年轻人和老年人在诊断区域上的差异:行为学结果显示,年轻人的面部表情识别得分明显高于老年人;此外,眼动追踪结果显示,年轻人对人脸的注视明显多于老年人,这表明老年人的知觉退化。年轻人在观察面部表情时主要看眼睛,其次是鼻子,最后是嘴巴。老年人则主要关注眼睛,其次是嘴巴,最后是鼻子:研究结果证实,与老年人相比,年轻人的面部表情识别能力更强,这可能与知觉退化有关,而不是与对面部信息区域的注意力下降有关。对于老年人来说,在识别人脸时应增加对面部诊断区域(如眼睛)的注视时间,以弥补知觉老化导致的面部识别能力下降的劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
期刊最新文献
Structural Equation Modeling of Childhood Trauma and Self-Stigma in Adult Inpatients with Borderline Personality Disorder. The ERP Components of Reward Processing Modulated by Status-Related Social Comparison. The Symptom Structure and Causal Relationships of Comorbid Anxiety and Depression Among Chinese Primary and Middle School Teachers: A Network Analysis. The Role of Self-Esteem and Depression in the Relationship Between Physical Activity and Academic Procrastination Among Chinese Undergraduate Students: A Serial Mediation Model. Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Perceived Empathic and Social Self-Efficacy Scale in Chinese Adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1