Development and Validation of a Contrast-Enhanced US VI-RADS for Evaluating Muscle Invasion in Bladder Cancer.

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.232815
Jing Han,Min Lin,Qingguang Lin,Ruohan Guo,Ying Liao,Zhiming Wu,Yunlin Ye,Zhixing Guo,Kai Yao,Lingling Li,Jianhua Zhou
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Contrast-Enhanced US VI-RADS for Evaluating Muscle Invasion in Bladder Cancer.","authors":"Jing Han,Min Lin,Qingguang Lin,Ruohan Guo,Ying Liao,Zhiming Wu,Yunlin Ye,Zhixing Guo,Kai Yao,Lingling Li,Jianhua Zhou","doi":"10.1148/radiol.232815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) can be used preoperatively for evaluating muscle invasion in bladder cancer, which is important for determining appropriate treatment. However, diagnostic criteria for assessing this at CEUS have not been standardized. Purpose To develop and validate a CEUS Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) for evaluating muscle invasion in bladder cancer. Materials and Methods This single-center prospective study consecutively enrolled patients with suspected bladder cancer. Participants underwent transabdominal or intracavity CEUS between July 2021 and May 2023. Participants were divided into a training set and a validation set at a 2:1 ratio based on the chronologic order of enrollment. The training set was used to identify major imaging features to include in CEUS VI-RADS, and the likelihood of muscle invasion per category was determined using a pathologic reference standard. The optimal VI-RADS category cutoff for muscle invasion was determined with use of the maximum Youden index. The validation set was assessed by novice and expert readers and used to validate the diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of the developed system. Results Overall, 126 participants (median age, 64 years [IQR, 57-71 years]; 107 male) and 67 participants (median age, 64 years [IQR, 56-69 years]; 49 male) were included in the training and validation set, respectively. In the training set, the optimal CEUS VI-RADS category cutoff for muscle invasion was VI-RADS 4 or higher (Youden index, 0.77). In the validation set, CEUS VI-RADS achieved good performance for both novice and expert readers (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.80 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.90] vs 0.88 [95% CI: 0.80, 0.97]; P = .09). The interreader agreement regarding the evaluation of CEUS VI-RADS category was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.85) for novice readers, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.92) for expert readers, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.84) for all readers. Conclusion The developed CEUS VI-RADS showed good performance and interreader agreement for the assessment of muscle invasion in bladder cancer. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry no. ChiCTR2100049435 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Morrell in this issue.","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.232815","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) can be used preoperatively for evaluating muscle invasion in bladder cancer, which is important for determining appropriate treatment. However, diagnostic criteria for assessing this at CEUS have not been standardized. Purpose To develop and validate a CEUS Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) for evaluating muscle invasion in bladder cancer. Materials and Methods This single-center prospective study consecutively enrolled patients with suspected bladder cancer. Participants underwent transabdominal or intracavity CEUS between July 2021 and May 2023. Participants were divided into a training set and a validation set at a 2:1 ratio based on the chronologic order of enrollment. The training set was used to identify major imaging features to include in CEUS VI-RADS, and the likelihood of muscle invasion per category was determined using a pathologic reference standard. The optimal VI-RADS category cutoff for muscle invasion was determined with use of the maximum Youden index. The validation set was assessed by novice and expert readers and used to validate the diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of the developed system. Results Overall, 126 participants (median age, 64 years [IQR, 57-71 years]; 107 male) and 67 participants (median age, 64 years [IQR, 56-69 years]; 49 male) were included in the training and validation set, respectively. In the training set, the optimal CEUS VI-RADS category cutoff for muscle invasion was VI-RADS 4 or higher (Youden index, 0.77). In the validation set, CEUS VI-RADS achieved good performance for both novice and expert readers (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.80 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.90] vs 0.88 [95% CI: 0.80, 0.97]; P = .09). The interreader agreement regarding the evaluation of CEUS VI-RADS category was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.85) for novice readers, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.92) for expert readers, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.84) for all readers. Conclusion The developed CEUS VI-RADS showed good performance and interreader agreement for the assessment of muscle invasion in bladder cancer. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry no. ChiCTR2100049435 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Morrell in this issue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于评估膀胱癌肌肉侵犯的对比增强 US VI-RADS 的开发与验证
背景 对比增强 US(CEUS)可用于术前评估膀胱癌的肌肉侵犯情况,这对确定适当的治疗非常重要。然而,CEUS 评估肌肉侵犯的诊断标准尚未标准化。目的 开发并验证用于评估膀胱癌肌肉侵犯的 CEUS 膀胱成像报告和数据系统 (VI-RADS)。材料和方法 这项单中心前瞻性研究连续招募疑似膀胱癌患者。参与者在 2021 年 7 月至 2023 年 5 月期间接受了经腹或腔内 CEUS 检查。根据入组的时间顺序,以 2:1 的比例将参与者分为训练集和验证集。训练集用于确定CEUS VI-RADS中应包含的主要成像特征,并使用病理学参考标准确定每个类别中肌肉受侵的可能性。使用最大尤登指数确定肌肉侵犯的最佳VI-RADS类别截止值。验证集由新手和专家阅读者进行评估,用于验证所开发系统的诊断性能和阅读者之间的一致性。结果 共有 126 名参与者(中位年龄 64 岁 [IQR,57-71 岁];107 名男性)和 67 名参与者(中位年龄 64 岁 [IQR,56-69 岁];49 名男性)分别被纳入训练集和验证集。在训练集中,肌肉侵犯的最佳 CEUS VI-RADS 类别临界值为 VI-RADS 4 或更高(尤登指数,0.77)。在验证集中,CEUS VI-RADS 对新手和专家读者都有良好的表现(接收者操作特征曲线下面积,0.80 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.90] vs 0.88 [95% CI: 0.80, 0.97]; P = .09)。对于 CEUS VI-RADS 类别的评估,新手读者的读数一致性为 0.77(95% CI:0.65,0.85),专家读者为 0.87(95% CI:0.79,0.92),所有读者均为 0.78(95% CI:0.70,0.84)。结论 所开发的 CEUS VI-RADS 在评估膀胱癌肌肉侵犯方面表现出良好的性能和读片者之间的一致性。中国临床试验注册中心编号ChiCTR2100049435 © RSNA, 2024 本文有补充材料。另请参阅本期莫雷尔的社论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
期刊最新文献
Amplifying Research in Radiology: The Podcast Effect. Amplifying Research: The Potential for Podcasts to Boost Radiology Journal Article Exposure. Automated Interstitial Lung Abnormality Probability Prediction at CT: A Stepwise Machine Learning Approach in the Boston Lung Cancer Study. Biomarkers for Personalized Neoadjuvant Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Moving Forward. Calcified Osteosarcoma Lung Metastases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1