Resorbable Microspheres versus Trisacryl Gelatin Microspheres for Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kichang Han,So Yeon Kim,Man-Deuk Kim,Joon Ho Kwon,Gyoung Min Kim,Sungmo Moon,Juil Park,Hyung Cheol Kim,Jong Yun Won,Turki Mohammed A Dhahi,Jinyoung Choi,Dong Kyu Kim,Jinho Yang,Hye Jung Shin
求助PDF
{"title":"Resorbable Microspheres versus Trisacryl Gelatin Microspheres for Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Kichang Han,So Yeon Kim,Man-Deuk Kim,Joon Ho Kwon,Gyoung Min Kim,Sungmo Moon,Juil Park,Hyung Cheol Kim,Jong Yun Won,Turki Mohammed A Dhahi,Jinyoung Choi,Dong Kyu Kim,Jinho Yang,Hye Jung Shin","doi":"10.1148/radiol.231525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background There are insufficient data comparing resorbable microspheres (RMs) with permanent trisacryl gelatin microspheres (TAGMs) for uterine artery embolization (UAE). Purpose To compare therapeutic efficacy and clinical outcomes in participants with symptomatic fibroids after UAE with RMs or TAGMs. Materials and Methods This randomized controlled trial included participants undergoing UAE for symptomatic fibroids at a single institution (from May 2021 to May 2023). Participants were randomized one-to-one to undergo UAE with either RMs or TAGMs. Numeric rating scale pain scores and cumulative fentanyl consumption were assessed for 24 hours after undergoing UAE. Anti-Mullerian hormone was measured to assess effects of UAE on ovarian function. MRI was performed before and 3 months after UAE to evaluate fibroid necrosis and uterine artery recanalization. Repeated variables such as pain were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test with post hoc Bonferroni correction. Results Sixty female participants (mean age, 45.7 years ± 3.6 [SD]) completed the study, with 30 in each group. No evidence of a difference in pain scores was observed between groups (P > .99). Moreover, there was no evidence of a difference in the total fentanyl consumption at 24 hours after UAE between groups (median: RMs, 423 [IQR, 330-530] vs TAGMs, 562 [IQR, 437-780]; P = .15). Serum anti-Mullerian hormone 3 months after UAE showed no evidence of a difference between groups (RMs vs TAGMs, 0.71 ng/mL ± 0.73 vs 0.49 ng/mL ± 0.45, respectively; P = .09). No evidence of a difference in the rate of complete necrosis of the dominant fibroid was observed between groups (97% [29 of 30] for both groups; P > .99). The rate of uterine artery recanalization was higher in RM versus TAGM groups (70% [21 of 30] vs 17% [five of 30], respectively; P < .001). Conclusion UAE with RMs, compared with UAE with TAGMs, showed no evidence of a difference in terms of therapeutic effectiveness or postprocedural pain scores in participants with symptomatic fibroids. Clinical trial registration no. NCT05086770 © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Spies in this issue.","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.231525","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
用于子宫动脉栓塞的可吸收微球与三聚丙烯明胶微球:随机对照试验。
背景 目前尚无足够数据比较可吸收微球(RMs)与永久性三丙烯明胶微球(TAGMs)在子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)中的应用。目的 比较使用 RMs 或 TAGMs 进行 UAE 后有症状子宫肌瘤患者的疗效和临床结局。材料和方法 该随机对照试验包括在一家机构接受超导电子显微镜治疗症状性子宫肌瘤的参与者(2021 年 5 月至 2023 年 5 月)。参试者被一对一随机分配到使用RMs或TAGMs进行UAE治疗。对接受 UAE 治疗后 24 小时内的数字评分表疼痛评分和芬太尼累积用量进行评估。对抗穆勒氏管激素进行了测量,以评估UAE对卵巢功能的影响。在做超导可视化手术前和手术后3个月进行核磁共振成像,以评估子宫肌瘤坏死和子宫动脉再通畅情况。疼痛等重复变量采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和事后 Bonferroni 校正进行分析。结果 60 名女性参与者(平均年龄 45.7 岁 ± 3.6 [SD])完成了研究,每组 30 人。没有证据表明组间疼痛评分存在差异(P > .99)。此外,也没有证据表明各组在 UAE 后 24 小时的芬太尼总用量存在差异(中位数:RMs,423 [IQR, 330-530] vs TAGMs,562 [IQR, 437-780]; P = .15)。UAE 3 个月后的血清抗苗勒氏管激素显示,组间无差别(RMs vs TAGMs,分别为 0.71 ng/mL ± 0.73 vs 0.49 ng/mL ± 0.45;P = .09)。没有证据表明组间优势肌瘤完全坏死率存在差异(两组均为 97% [30个中的29个];P > .99)。RM组的子宫动脉再通率高于TAGM组(分别为70% [30例中的21例] vs 17% [30例中的5例];P < .001)。结论 在有症状的子宫肌瘤患者中,与使用 TAGM 的 UAE 相比,使用 RM 的 UAE 在治疗效果或术后疼痛评分方面没有证据表明存在差异。临床试验注册号NCT05086770 © RSNA, 2024 另请参阅 Spies 在本期发表的社论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。