Shakthivelu Janardhanan;Maria Samonaki;Poul Einar Heegaard;Wolfgang Kellerer;Carmen Mas-Machuca
{"title":"Network Sovereignty: A Novel Metric and Its Application on Network Design","authors":"Shakthivelu Janardhanan;Maria Samonaki;Poul Einar Heegaard;Wolfgang Kellerer;Carmen Mas-Machuca","doi":"10.1109/TR.2024.3434560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most network planning problems in the literature consider metrics, such as cost, availability, and other technology-aware attributes. However, network operators now face new challenges in designing their networks to minimize their dependencies on manufacturers. A low dependency is associated with higher network robustness in case one or more manufacturers fail due to erroneous component design, geopolitical banning of manufacturers, or other reasons discussed in this work. Our work discusses network sovereignty, i.e., the ability to operate a network while minimizing the dependencies on a particular manufacturer to minimize the impact of simultaneous manufacturer failure(s). Network sovereignty is considered by solving the manufacturer assignment problem in the network such that robustness is maximized. The following three main contributions of this work are, first, the discussion of network sovereignty as a special attribute of dependability, second, the introduction of a novel metric—the path set diversity (PSD) score to measure a network's sovereignty based on the manufacturers used in the network, and, third, the introduction of Naga, an integer linear program formulation to maximize network sovereignty using the PSD score. We compare the Naga’s performance with centrality metrics-based heuristics and an availability-based optimization. Our work aims to be the foundation to guide network operators in increasing their network sovereignty.","PeriodicalId":56305,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Reliability","volume":"74 2","pages":"2927-2941"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10634534","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10634534/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most network planning problems in the literature consider metrics, such as cost, availability, and other technology-aware attributes. However, network operators now face new challenges in designing their networks to minimize their dependencies on manufacturers. A low dependency is associated with higher network robustness in case one or more manufacturers fail due to erroneous component design, geopolitical banning of manufacturers, or other reasons discussed in this work. Our work discusses network sovereignty, i.e., the ability to operate a network while minimizing the dependencies on a particular manufacturer to minimize the impact of simultaneous manufacturer failure(s). Network sovereignty is considered by solving the manufacturer assignment problem in the network such that robustness is maximized. The following three main contributions of this work are, first, the discussion of network sovereignty as a special attribute of dependability, second, the introduction of a novel metric—the path set diversity (PSD) score to measure a network's sovereignty based on the manufacturers used in the network, and, third, the introduction of Naga, an integer linear program formulation to maximize network sovereignty using the PSD score. We compare the Naga’s performance with centrality metrics-based heuristics and an availability-based optimization. Our work aims to be the foundation to guide network operators in increasing their network sovereignty.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Reliability is a refereed journal for the reliability and allied disciplines including, but not limited to, maintainability, physics of failure, life testing, prognostics, design and manufacture for reliability, reliability for systems of systems, network availability, mission success, warranty, safety, and various measures of effectiveness. Topics eligible for publication range from hardware to software, from materials to systems, from consumer and industrial devices to manufacturing plants, from individual items to networks, from techniques for making things better to ways of predicting and measuring behavior in the field. As an engineering subject that supports new and existing technologies, we constantly expand into new areas of the assurance sciences.