Choosing the Right Communication Protocol for your Web Application

Mohamed Hassan
{"title":"Choosing the Right Communication Protocol for your Web Application","authors":"Mohamed Hassan","doi":"arxiv-2409.07360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selecting the appropriate communication protocol is crucial for optimizing\nthe performance, scalability, and user experience of web applications. In the\ndiverse ecosystem of web technologies, various protocols like RESTful APIs,\ngRPC, WebSockets, and others serve distinct purposes. RESTful APIs are widely\nfavored for their simplicity and stateless nature, making them ideal for\nstandard CRUD operations. They offer a straightforward approach to interacting\nwith resources over HTTP/1.1, providing broad compatibility and ease of\nintegration across different platforms. However, in scenarios where\napplications require high efficiency and real-time communication, gRPC and\nWebSockets emerge as powerful alternatives. Each protocol comes with its\nstrengths and limitations, influencing factors such as ease of implementation,\nperformance under load, and support for complex data structures. RESTful APIs,\nwhile easy to use and widely supported, may introduce overhead due to their\nstateless nature and reliance on multiple HTTP/1.1 requests. In contrast, gRPC\nadvanced features, while powerful, require a steeper learning curve and more\nsophisticated infrastructure. Similarly, WebSockets, while excellent for\nreal-time applications, require careful management of persistent connections\nand security considerations. This paper explores the key considerations in\nchoosing the right communication protocol, emphasizing the need to align\ntechnical choices with application requirements and user expectations. By\nunderstanding the unique attributes of each protocol, developers can make\ninformed decisions that enhance the responsiveness and reliability of their web\napplications. The choice of protocol can significantly impact the user\nexperience, scalability, and maintainability of the application, making it a\ncritical decision in the web development process.","PeriodicalId":501278,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selecting the appropriate communication protocol is crucial for optimizing the performance, scalability, and user experience of web applications. In the diverse ecosystem of web technologies, various protocols like RESTful APIs, gRPC, WebSockets, and others serve distinct purposes. RESTful APIs are widely favored for their simplicity and stateless nature, making them ideal for standard CRUD operations. They offer a straightforward approach to interacting with resources over HTTP/1.1, providing broad compatibility and ease of integration across different platforms. However, in scenarios where applications require high efficiency and real-time communication, gRPC and WebSockets emerge as powerful alternatives. Each protocol comes with its strengths and limitations, influencing factors such as ease of implementation, performance under load, and support for complex data structures. RESTful APIs, while easy to use and widely supported, may introduce overhead due to their stateless nature and reliance on multiple HTTP/1.1 requests. In contrast, gRPC advanced features, while powerful, require a steeper learning curve and more sophisticated infrastructure. Similarly, WebSockets, while excellent for real-time applications, require careful management of persistent connections and security considerations. This paper explores the key considerations in choosing the right communication protocol, emphasizing the need to align technical choices with application requirements and user expectations. By understanding the unique attributes of each protocol, developers can make informed decisions that enhance the responsiveness and reliability of their web applications. The choice of protocol can significantly impact the user experience, scalability, and maintainability of the application, making it a critical decision in the web development process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为网络应用程序选择正确的通信协议
选择合适的通信协议对于优化网络应用程序的性能、可扩展性和用户体验至关重要。在多样化的网络技术生态系统中,RESTful API、gRPC、WebSockets 等各种协议都有各自不同的用途。RESTful API 因其简单性和无状态性而广受青睐,是标准 CRUD 操作的理想选择。它们提供了通过 HTTP/1.1 与资源交互的直接方法,具有广泛的兼容性,易于在不同平台间集成。然而,在应用程序需要高效率和实时通信的场景中,gRPC 和 WebSockets 成为了强大的替代方案。每种协议都有其优势和局限性,影响因素包括实施的难易程度、负载下的性能以及对复杂数据结构的支持。RESTful 应用程序接口虽然易于使用并得到广泛支持,但由于其无状态特性和对多个 HTTP/1.1 请求的依赖,可能会带来开销。相比之下,gRPC 高级功能虽然强大,但需要更陡峭的学习曲线和更复杂的基础设施。同样,WebSockets 虽然非常适合实时应用,但需要对持久连接进行仔细管理并考虑安全因素。本文探讨了选择正确通信协议的关键因素,强调了根据应用需求和用户期望进行技术选择的必要性。通过了解每种协议的独特属性,开发人员可以做出明智的决定,从而提高网络应用程序的响应速度和可靠性。协议的选择会对应用程序的使用体验、可扩展性和可维护性产生重大影响,因此是网络开发过程中的关键决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promise and Peril of Collaborative Code Generation Models: Balancing Effectiveness and Memorization Shannon Entropy is better Feature than Category and Sentiment in User Feedback Processing Motivations, Challenges, Best Practices, and Benefits for Bots and Conversational Agents in Software Engineering: A Multivocal Literature Review A Taxonomy of Self-Admitted Technical Debt in Deep Learning Systems Investigating team maturity in an agile automotive reorganization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1