Haowei Cheng, Jati H. Husen, Sien Reeve Peralta, Bowen Jiang, Nobukazu Yoshioka, Naoyasu Ubayashi, Hironori Washizaki
{"title":"Generative AI for Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Haowei Cheng, Jati H. Husen, Sien Reeve Peralta, Bowen Jiang, Nobukazu Yoshioka, Naoyasu Ubayashi, Hironori Washizaki","doi":"arxiv-2409.06741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Generative AI (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative tool in\nsoftware engineering, with requirements engineering (RE) actively exploring its\npotential to revolutionize processes and outcomes. The integration of GenAI\ninto RE presents both promising opportunities and significant challenges that\nnecessitate systematic analysis and evaluation. Objective: This paper presents\na comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) analyzing state-of-the-art\napplications and innovative proposals leveraging GenAI in RE. It surveys\nstudies focusing on the utilization of GenAI to enhance RE processes while\nidentifying key challenges and opportunities in this rapidly evolving field.\nMethod: A rigorous SLR methodology was used to analyze 27 carefully selected\nprimary studies in-depth. The review examined research questions pertaining to\nthe application of GenAI across various RE phases, the models and techniques\nused, and the challenges encountered in implementation and adoption. Results:\nThe most salient findings include i) a predominant focus on the early stages of\nRE, particularly the elicitation and analysis of requirements, indicating\npotential for expansion into later phases; ii) the dominance of large language\nmodels, especially the GPT series, highlighting the need for diverse AI\napproaches; and iii) persistent challenges in domain-specific applications and\nthe interpretability of AI-generated outputs, underscoring areas requiring\nfurther research and development. Conclusions: The results highlight the\ncritical need for comprehensive evaluation frameworks, improved human-AI\ncollaboration models, and thorough consideration of ethical implications in\nGenAI-assisted RE. Future research should prioritize extending GenAI\napplications across the entire RE lifecycle, enhancing domain-specific\ncapabilities, and developing strategies for responsible AI integration in RE\npractices.","PeriodicalId":501278,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","volume":"214 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Generative AI (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative tool in
software engineering, with requirements engineering (RE) actively exploring its
potential to revolutionize processes and outcomes. The integration of GenAI
into RE presents both promising opportunities and significant challenges that
necessitate systematic analysis and evaluation. Objective: This paper presents
a comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) analyzing state-of-the-art
applications and innovative proposals leveraging GenAI in RE. It surveys
studies focusing on the utilization of GenAI to enhance RE processes while
identifying key challenges and opportunities in this rapidly evolving field.
Method: A rigorous SLR methodology was used to analyze 27 carefully selected
primary studies in-depth. The review examined research questions pertaining to
the application of GenAI across various RE phases, the models and techniques
used, and the challenges encountered in implementation and adoption. Results:
The most salient findings include i) a predominant focus on the early stages of
RE, particularly the elicitation and analysis of requirements, indicating
potential for expansion into later phases; ii) the dominance of large language
models, especially the GPT series, highlighting the need for diverse AI
approaches; and iii) persistent challenges in domain-specific applications and
the interpretability of AI-generated outputs, underscoring areas requiring
further research and development. Conclusions: The results highlight the
critical need for comprehensive evaluation frameworks, improved human-AI
collaboration models, and thorough consideration of ethical implications in
GenAI-assisted RE. Future research should prioritize extending GenAI
applications across the entire RE lifecycle, enhancing domain-specific
capabilities, and developing strategies for responsible AI integration in RE
practices.