Optimal spur dike orientation for scour mitigation under downward seepage conditions

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 WATER RESOURCES Journal Of Hydrology And Hydromechanics Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.2478/johh-2024-0019
Harish K. Patel, Bimlesh Kumar
{"title":"Optimal spur dike orientation for scour mitigation under downward seepage conditions","authors":"Harish K. Patel, Bimlesh Kumar","doi":"10.2478/johh-2024-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"River bank protection is vital in hydraulic river engineering to preserve natural rivers, lands, and critical constructions such as bridges. Spur dikes are erosion-protective structures that protrude outward from the river bank in different orientations to deflect the flow away from the riverbank. The present experimental study provides insight into the temporal variation in bed morphology and scours around rectangular-shaped spur dikes with different orientations, such as 60º, 90º, and 120º. Also, maximum scour depth (MSD) is developed compared to the condition when downward seepage is applied. The experiments examined the suitability of various spur dike orientation configurations and the scour development over time, specifically at intervals of 2, 12, and 24 hours, and compared with 24 hours (Seepage). Results showed that the orientation angle of 90º generated the highest scour depth, while the least scour depth was found with an orientation angle of 120º. The downward seepage intensifies the motion of sediment particles and leads to an escalated particle detachment, resulting in deeper scour depressions. The development of scour depth is initiated from the spur dike tip and reaches its maximum there. The deposition of sand particles shifted downstream, and a dune-like structure formed near the second spur dike.","PeriodicalId":50183,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Hydrology And Hydromechanics","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Hydrology And Hydromechanics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2024-0019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

River bank protection is vital in hydraulic river engineering to preserve natural rivers, lands, and critical constructions such as bridges. Spur dikes are erosion-protective structures that protrude outward from the river bank in different orientations to deflect the flow away from the riverbank. The present experimental study provides insight into the temporal variation in bed morphology and scours around rectangular-shaped spur dikes with different orientations, such as 60º, 90º, and 120º. Also, maximum scour depth (MSD) is developed compared to the condition when downward seepage is applied. The experiments examined the suitability of various spur dike orientation configurations and the scour development over time, specifically at intervals of 2, 12, and 24 hours, and compared with 24 hours (Seepage). Results showed that the orientation angle of 90º generated the highest scour depth, while the least scour depth was found with an orientation angle of 120º. The downward seepage intensifies the motion of sediment particles and leads to an escalated particle detachment, resulting in deeper scour depressions. The development of scour depth is initiated from the spur dike tip and reaches its maximum there. The deposition of sand particles shifted downstream, and a dune-like structure formed near the second spur dike.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在下渗条件下减轻冲刷的最佳支堤方向
河岸保护在水利河道工程中至关重要,可保护自然河流、土地和桥梁等重要建筑。突堤是一种侵蚀防护结构,以不同的方向从河岸向外突出,使水流偏离河岸。本实验研究深入探讨了不同方向(如 60º、90º 和 120º)的矩形支墩周围河床形态和冲刷的时间变化。此外,与向下渗流时的情况相比,还得出了最大冲刷深度(MSD)。实验考察了不同支堤方向配置的适用性以及随时间变化的冲刷发展情况,特别是每隔 2、12 和 24 小时的冲刷发展情况,并与 24 小时(渗流)进行了比较。结果表明,90º 方向角产生的冲刷深度最大,而 120º 方向角产生的冲刷深度最小。向下的渗流加剧了沉积物颗粒的运动,导致颗粒脱落加剧,形成更深的冲刷洼地。冲刷深度从支堤顶端开始发展,并在该处达到最大值。沙粒的沉积向下游转移,在第二个支堤附近形成了沙丘状结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY AND HYDROMECHANICS is an international open access journal for the basic disciplines of water sciences. The scope of hydrology is limited to biohydrology, catchment hydrology and vadose zone hydrology, primarily of temperate zone. The hydromechanics covers theoretical, experimental and computational hydraulics and fluid mechanics in various fields, two- and multiphase flows, including non-Newtonian flow, and new frontiers in hydraulics. The journal is published quarterly in English. The types of contribution include: research and review articles, short communications and technical notes. The articles have been thoroughly peer reviewed by international specialists and promoted to researchers working in the same field.
期刊最新文献
Long-term field pH manipulation influence on microbial activity, water repellency and physical properties of soil Experimental and numerical investigation of water freezing and thawing in fully saturated sand Development of forest ecosystems on biota monitoring plots in the area of influence of Gabčíkovo Waterwork Optimal spur dike orientation for scour mitigation under downward seepage conditions Analysis of the unsaturated hydraulic properties of rocks using multiple laboratory methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1